Little Ahmed’s Time-Bomb Clock HOAX

September 19, 2015

Apart from his dad being a muslim activist who ran for President of Sudan, “Little Ahmed” Mohamed himself is a liar.

(What’s that, you say? A muslim liar!? Say it isn’t so)!


From here:

Reverse Engineering Ahmed Mohamed’s Clock… and Ourselves.


I have something in common with Ahmed Mohamed: as a youngster, I was also an electronics enthusiast. At his age and even earlier, I frequently took apart electronic devices – anything from my own toys, to broken things around the house, and even that dirty garbage-picked black and white TV my parents dragged home that they knew I’d have a blast playing with (I did.) I’d try and troubleshoot, repair, or sometimes just disassemble things and salvage components for future projects. I’d try and imagine how all those bits and pieces, lengths of wires, mazes of conductive circuit board traces all came together to produce an image, or a sound, or some other useful function. I wanted to know how it all worked.

Without dating myself – fast forward a bunch of years, and I’m the same way. I’ve even picked up an engineering degree over the course of those years. I don’t have to only imagine how things work anymore, I have a pretty good understanding now. When shopping for electronic devices, my first instinct is to see if there’s a way to build one myself (and, I frequently do!) When something of mine breaks, I don’t send it back, I take it as a personal challenge to get it working again. If I fail, I still salvage useful parts – they might come in handy to fix something else later. This aspect of myself – being both methodical, and curious – hasn’t changed a bit over the years.

High resolution police photo of Ahmed's clock. Click to enlarge.

So, this story about a 14 year old boy in Texas that was arrested on suspicion of creating a bomb hoax (who, apparently just wanted to show off his latest electronics project to his teachers) that has blown up (no pun intended) all over the news and social media, caught my attention immediately. Not because of his race, or his religion, the seeming absurdity of the situation, the emotionally charged photo of a young boy in a NASA t-shirt being led off in hand cuffs, the hash tags, the presidential response… no, none of that. I’m an electronics geek. I was interested in the clock! I wanted to figure out what he had come up with.

I found the highest resolution photograph of the clock I could. Instantly, I was disappointed. Somewhere in all of this – there has indeed been a hoax. Ahmed Mohamed didn’t invent his own alarm clock. He didn’t even build a clock. Now, before I go on and get accused of attacking a 14 year old kid who’s already been through enough, let me explain my purpose. I don’t want to just dissect the clock. I want to dissect our reaction as a society to the situation. Part of that is the knee-jerk responses we’re all so quick to make without facts. So, before you scroll down and leave me angry comments, please continue to the end (or not – prove my point, and miss the point, entirely!)

For starters, one glance at the printed circuit board in the photo, and I knew we were looking at mid-to-late 1970s vintage electronics. Surely you’ve seen a modern circuit board, with metallic traces leading all over to the various components like an electronic spider’s web. You’ll notice right away the highly accurate spacing, straightness of the lines, consistency of the patterns. That’s because we design things on computers nowadays, and computers assist in routing these lines. Take a look at the board in Ahmed’s clock. It almost looks hand-drawn, right? That’s because it probably was. Computer aided design was in its infancy in the 70s. This is how simple, low cost items (like an alarm clock) were designed. Today, even a budding beginner is going to get some computer aided assistance – in fact they’ll probably start there, learning by simulating designs before building them. You can even simulate or lay out a board with free apps on your phone or tablet. A modern hobbyist usually wouldn’t be bothered with the outdated design techniques. There’s also silk screening on the board. An “M” logo, “C-94” (probably, a part number – C might even stand for “clock”), and what looks like an American flag. More about that in a minute. Point for now being, a hobbyist wouldn’t silk screen logos and part numbers on their home made creation. It’s pretty safe to say already we’re looking at ’70s tech, mass produced in a factory.

So I turned to eBay, searching for vintage alarm clocks. It only took a minute to locate Ahmed’s clock. See this eBay listing, up at the time of this writing. Amhed’s clock was invented, and built, by Micronta, a Radio Shack subsidary. Catalog number 63 756.

Image property of eBay seller curiosities_curios

The shape and design is a dead give away. The large screen. The buttons on the front laid out horizontally would have been on a separate board – a large snooze button, four control buttons, and two switches to turn the alarm on and off, and choose two brightness levels. A second board inside would have contained the actual “brains” of the unit. The clock features a 9v battery back-up, and a switch on the rear allows the owner to choose between 12 and 24 hour time. (Features like a battery back-up, and a 24 hour time selection seems awful superfluous for a hobby project, don’t you think?) Oh, and about that “M” logo on the circuit board mentioned above? Micronta.


clock6For one last bit of confirmation, I located the pencil box Ahmed used for his project. During this video interview he again claims it was his “invention” and that he “made” the device – but the important thing at the moment, at 1:13, we see him showing the pencil box on his computer screen. Here it is on Amazon, where it’s clearly labeled as being 8.25 inches wide. Our eBay seller also conveniently took a photo of the clock next to a ruler to show it’s scale – about 8 inches wide. The dimensions all line up perfectly.

So there you have it folks, Ahmed Mohamad did not invent, nor build a clock. He took apart an existing clock, and transplanted the guts into a pencil box, and claimed it was his own creation. It all seems really fishy to me.

If we accept the story about “inventing” an alarm clock is made up, as I think I’ve made a pretty good case for, it’s fair to wonder what other parts of the story might be made up, not reported factually by the media, or at least, exaggerated.

I refer back again to this YouTube video interview with Ahmed. He explains that he closed up the box with a piece of cord because he didn’t want it to look suspicious. I’m curious, why would “looking suspicious” have even crossed his mind before this whole event unfolded, if he was truly showing off a hobby project, something so innocuous as an alarm clock. Why did he choose a pencil box, one that looks like a miniature briefcase no less, as an enclosure for a clock? It’s awful hard to see the clock with the case closed. On the other hand, with the case open, it’s awful dangerous to have an exposed power transformer sitting near the snooze button (unless, perhaps his invention was to stop serial-snooze-button pressers by giving them a dangerous electrical shock!)

So again, I’m pointing all this out – about the specifics of the clock – not to pick on the poor kid. I’m picking on us, our culture, and our media. I don’t even care about the clock itself at this point.

If we stop and think – was it really such a ridiculous reaction from the teacher and the police in the first place? How many school shootings and incidents of violence have we had, where we hear afterwards “this could have been prevented, if only we paid more attention to the signs!” Teachers are taught to be suspicious and vigilant. Ahmed wasn’t accused of making a bomb – he was accused of making a look-alike, a hoax. And be honest with yourself, a big red digital display with a bunch of loose wires in a brief-case looking box is awful like a Hollywood-style representation of a bomb. Everyone jumped to play the race and religion cards and try and paint the teachers and police as idiots and bigots, but in my mind, they were probably acting responsibly and erring on the side of caution to protect the rest of their students, just in case. “This wouldn’t have happened if Ahmed were white,” they say. We’re supposed to be sensitive to school violence, but apparently religious and racial sensitivity trumps that. At least we have another clue about how the sensitivity and moral outrage pecking order lies.

Because, is it possible, that maybe, just maybe, this was actually a hoax bomb? A silly prank that was taken the wrong way? That the media then ran with, and everyone else got carried away? Maybe there wasn’t even any racial or religious bias on the parts of the teachers and police.

I don’t know any of these things. But I’m intellectually mature enough to admit I don’t know, and to also be OK with that. I don’t feel a need to take the first exist to conclusionville. But I do like to find facts where I can, and prefer to let them lead me to conclusions, rather than a knee jerk judgement based on a headline or sound bite.

I think the whole event – and our collective response, with everybody up to the President chiming in, says a whole lot about us. We don’t care that none of us were there and knows what happened, we jump to conclusions and assume we’re experts. We care about the story, but we don’t care about the actual facts. Headlines and click-bait are far more interesting than thinking for ourselves. We like to point out other any bit of perceived injustice or discrimination we can find – it’s practically a new national past-time. We like playing victim, and we like talking about victims – so much so we sometimes find victims where none really existed. We also like to find somebody to blame, even when there’s nobody at fault. We like to play social justice warrior on our Facebooks and Twitters, posting memes and headlines without digging in behind the sensationalism, winning bonus sensitivity points in the forms of likes and re-tweets. Once group-think kicks in, we rally around hash tags and start shouting moral outrage in a deafeningly loud national chorus. The media plays us like a fiddle, and we don’t even notice we’ve all been had.

As for me, I’m glad to apply the lessons I’ve learned as an electronics enthusiast to other aspects of life. There’s no emotion in troubleshooting a circuit, electricity doesn’t have morals. There’s just physics, and logic, and methodology. I think we could all benefit from applying a little more of that sort of thinking to these situations.

* Correction: A reader and commenter, Joe Donaldson, tracked down the clock in a Radio Shack catalog dated 1986. It’s likely that my guess of mid-to-late 70s was off by a bit, and it’s now obvious it was a model that was for sale in the mid 80s. Though it doesn’t really change the point, I want to post this correction here for accuracy sake and thank Joe for the heads up. (See the comment here, with link to the catalog page.)



Alcoholic Unjustly Fired For Drinking on Job – Rights Commission

September 17, 2015

Excessive drinking not a firing offence for an alcoholic, Manitoba human rights board rules


From HERE:

Linda Horrocks was suspended from work in June 2011 at a personal care home in Flin Flon run by the Northern Regional Health Authority after a co-worker complained that she was drunk.

Aaron C – Theoffice89 / Wikimedia Commons
Linda Horrocks was suspended from work in June 2011 at a personal care home in Flin Flon run by the Northern Regional Health Authority after a co-worker complained that she was drunk.

WINNIPEG — A health-care aide’s alcohol addiction qualifies as a disability, and her employer was wrong to fire her for drinking off the job, a Manitoba human rights adjudicator has ruled.

Linda Horrocks is entitled to be reinstated, get three years back pay and an additional $10,000 for injury to her dignity, independent adjudicator Sherri Walsh said in a report released Tuesday.

“The issue for determination in this matter is not whether the complainant was drinking on a given day but rather whether (the employer) made reasonable efforts to accommodate the complainant as soon as it was aware that she had a disability and special needs associated with that disability,” Walsh wrote.

Horrocks was suspended from work in June 2011 at a personal care home in Flin Flon run by the Northern Regional Health Authority after a co-worker complained that she was drunk, according to evidence presented at the human rights board hearing.

She signed an agreement that allowed her to return to work under several conditions, including that she abstain from alcohol both on and off the job and seek counselling.

Horrocks was fired a year later when her employer received two reports that she had been drinking outside of work — once in a grocery store and once during a phone call with a manager.

Horrocks denied consuming alcohol and said she had been undergoing addiction counselling. She eventually filed a complaint with the Manitoba Human Rights Commission, which appointed Walsh to hear the matter.

The regional health authority told the hearing it had tried to accommodate Horrocks but also needed to protect the safety of people in the health-care system.

Walsh ruled that alcohol addiction amounts to a disability under the human rights code, citing a 2013 ruling in a similar case.

Each individual is entitled to an accommodation which is based on an individualized assessment of his or her specific needs

She ruled that the health authority failed to accommodate Horrocks’ disability because it did not seek advice from experts in drawing up conditions for her return to work in 2011.

“Instead, I find that members of the (health authority’s) staff relied on their experiences with other staff who had required accommodation relating to addiction and on their own personal experiences,” Walsh wrote.

“Information of that sort is precisely the type of information that cannot be relied on as the basis for accommodating an employee. Each individual is entitled to an accommodation which is based on an individualized assessment of his or her specific needs.”

A spokeswoman for the health authority said the agency respects the human rights commission but would not rule out an appeal.

“We’re reviewing the decision to assess its impact and we will take steps to ensure patient safety is not compromised, as that remains a top priority for us,” Twyla Storey said.

The Bear Steps In: Russia’s Expanding Military Presence in Syria

September 14, 2015

From the MEForum and JPost:

Compendium of Quotes about Islam

September 3, 2015


A very good start! Here’s the whole list (so far)! This is a collected series of quotes from Counterjihadists, Muslims and historical figures which demonstrate the dangers of the theopolitical ideology known as Islam. This was put together by pseudonymous Civilization Jihad Awareness and posted on the Google+ Group Americans Against Jihad as well as the anonymous person’s Google+ page. JRH 9/2/15 Please Support NCCR *********************** Compendium of Quotes about Islam Gathered by Civilization Jihad Awareness August 31, 2015 6:17 AM and 6:07 AM Found on Google + Group – Americans against Jihad Quotes about Islam My Fellow Kafirs This is a massive compendium of quotes I’ve been able to gather about Islam. (Be advised, it is a lengthy read.) I have gathered quotes from Muslims, ex-Muslims, Presidents, Prime Ministers, politicians, historians, scholars, authors, writers, journalists, activists, and all manner of famous public figures. I think this is enough to convince even the most closed minded and brainwashed Islamopologist to change their mind and see Islam for what it really is. Feel free to share it or save it to a word document. If you find the time to read it, I hope you enjoy it. “Muhammad is a narcissist, a pedophile, a mass murderer, a terrorist, a misogynist, a lecher, a cult leader, a madman, a rapist, a torturer, an assassin and a looter.” – Ali Sina Iranian ex-Muslim, founder of Faith-Freedom International, a grass-roots movement of ex-Muslims. (In 2001, he offered a reward of $50,000 to anyone who could disprove his claim using the Islamic texts. The reward remains unclaimed.) “I came to the absolute conviction that it is impossible… impossible …for any human being to read the biography of Mohammed and believe in it, and then emerge a psychologically and mentally healthy person.” – Dr. Wafa Sultan Syrian born ex-Muslim, psychiatrist and author. “O Muslims, Islam was never for a day the religion of peace! Islam is the religion of war… Mohammed was ordered to wage war until Allah is worshipped alone… He himself left to fight and took part in dozens of battles. He never for a day grew tired of war. “ – Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi Leader of Islamic State, holds a BA, MA, and PhD in Islamic studies from the Islamic University of Baghdad. “Muslims, whether they live in Pakistan or India, Nigeria or Syria, whether they are poor or rich, illiterate or educated, their only goal is to destroy the whole nation by terrorism, bomb blasts, population explosion, riots and jihad in the name of Islam.” – Sir Salman Rushdie Indian-British ex-Muslim, novelist and essayist, author of “The Satanic Verses.” The target of a notorious fatwa issued by Ayatollah Khomeini, his bounty has since increased to $3,300,000. “Every Continental under the age of 40 – make that 60, if not 75 – is all but guaranteed to end his days living in an Islamified Europe. Native populations on the continent are aging and fading and being supplanted remorselessly by a young Muslim demographic.” “Why did Bosnia collapse into the worst slaughter in Europe since the second World War? In the thirty years before the meltdown, Bosnian Serbs had declined from 43 percent to 31 percent of the population, while Bosnian Muslims had increased from 26 percent to 44 percent. In a democratic age, you can’t buck demography—except through civil war. The Serbs figured that out, as other Continentals will in the years ahead: if you cannot outbreed the enemy, cull ’em. The problem that Europe faces is that Bosnia’s demographic profile is now the model for the entire continent.” “Multiculturalism means that the worst attributes of Muslim culture – the subjugation of women – combine with the worst attributes of Western culture – license and self-gratification. I am not a racist, only a culturist. I believe Western culture – rule of law, universal suffrage – is preferable to Arab culture.” – Mark Steyn Canadian writer, author, conservative political commentator. “There is a demographic catastrophe happening in Europe that nobody wants to talk about, that we daren’t bring up because we are so cagey about not offending people racially. And rightly we should be. But there is a cultural thing as well. By 2020, 50 per cent of the children in Holland under the age of 18 will be of Muslim descent. I think that Tolkien says that some generations will be challenged. And if they do not rise to meet that challenge, they will lose their civilisation. That does have a real resonance with me.” – John Rhys-Davies Welsh Hollywood movie actor. “The fall in the (German) population can no longer be stopped. Its downward spiral is no longer reversible… It will be a Muslim state by the year 2050.” – Walter Rademacher Director General of Eurostat, speaking with the Federal Statistics Office of Germany, in 2006. “There are signs that Allah will grant victory to Islam in Europe, without swords, without guns, without conquest. We don’t need terrorists. We don’t need homicide bombers. The 50 million Muslims in Europe will turn it into an Islamic continent, within a few decades.” – Muammar al-Gaddafi (speech on 10th April 2006) Leader of Libya from 1969-2011 “I have tried my best with this religion, which is as foreign to me, as to the many millions who will always doubt, that god entrusted a nonreader, through an intermediary, with the demanding call to read. Islam in its origins is just as shady and approximate as those from which it took its borrowings. It makes immense claims for itself, invokes prostrate submission or ‘surrender’ as a maxim to its adherents, and demands deference and respect from non-believers into the bargain. There is nothing, absolutely nothing in its teachings that can even begin to justify such arrogance and presumption.” “Don’t waste my time with Islam – it’s bullshit.” “All the time, all the time, we have to hear propaganda pumped out of radio stations all over the Muslim world, telling children to kill Jews, telling children to kill Hindus, telling children to kill Christians, telling them that their sisters, and mothers, and aunts are inferior, telling them that homosexuals should be stoned. We have to read, and claim not to be offended, by the stoning of ten people in the Islamic republic of Iran… for crimes they did not commit, that would not be crimes, except under the mad religious laws that Islam proposes.” “Ladies and gentlemen, I beseech you. Resist it while you still can, and before the right to complain is taken away from you, which will be the next thing… you will be told: You can’t complain, because you’re “Islamophobic”. The term is already being introduced into the culture, as if it was an accusation of race hatred, for example, or bigotry, whereas it’s only the objection to the preachings of a very extreme and absolutist religion.” – Christopher Hitchens English-American author, atheist, journalist, columnist and literary critic. (13 April 1949 – 15 December 2011). “Islam is not a religion, it’s an ideology, the ideology of a retarded culture. I have a problem with Islamic tradition, culture, ideology. Not with Muslim people. I don’t hate Muslims. I hate Islam.” “The Qur’an is an inspiration for intolerance, murder, and terror… a fascist book that incites violence. That is why this book, just like (Adolf Hitler’s) Mein Kampf, must be banned.” “Take a walk down the street and see where this is going. You no longer feel like you are living in your own country. There is a battle going on and we have to defend ourselves.” – Geert Wilders Dutch lawmaker, politician, leader of the Dutch Freedom Party, director of Fitna. “Islam is not a race, ethnicity, or nationality: It’s a set of ideas. Criticism of these ideas should never be confused with an animus toward people. And yet it is. I’m convinced that this is often done consciously, strategically, and quite cynically as a means of shutting down conversation [on] important topics.” “We have to be able to criticize bad ideas. And Islam is the mother lode of bad ideas.” “To speak specifically of our problem with the Muslim world, we are meandering into a genuine clash of civilizations, and we’re deluding ourselves with euphemisms. We’re talking about Islam being a “religion of peace” that’s been “hijacked” by extremists. If ever there was a religion that’s not a religion of peace, it is Islam.” “Extremism is not a problem if your core beliefs are truly non-violent. The problem isn’t fundamentalism. We often hear this said; these are euphemisms… The only problem with Islamic fundamentalism, are the fundamentals of Islam.” “It is time we admitted that we are not at war with “terrorism”. We are at war with Islam.” – Sam Harris American author, neuroscientist, atheist, philosopher, writer. “Child marriage in Islam is permissible. In the Koran there is no specific age of marriage… [If the government imposed new laws against child marriage] There will be violent conflict from the Muslims, saying that ‘no, we will not accept this, we’d rather die than accept something which is not a law from Allah.” “Nigeria has many uncountable problems and none of them is early marriage. As a matter of fact early marriage (is) the solution to about half of our problems. For those who wonder if I can give my daughter(s) out in marriage at the age of 9 or 13, I tell you most honestly, I can give her out at the age of 6 if I want to and it’s not your business. This is because I am a Muslim and I follow the example of the best of mankind – Muhammad.” – Ahmed Sani Yerima Former governor and current senator of Zamfara State, Nigeria. “Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage of the holy prophet of Islam, who also married minor Ayesha, when she was just eight years old. The new law [seeking to ban child marriages] initiated by the current government [of Bangladesh] will put the moral character of the prophet into controversy and challenge. Islam permits child marriage and it will not be tolerated if any ruler will ever try to touch this issue in the name of giving more rights to women.” – Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini Islamic Scholar and politician from Bangladesh, an MP on the Parliament of Bangladesh from 2002 to 2007. He was an expert in the fields of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh), hadith and tasawwuf. (1943–2012). “Because this happened to the Prophet, we cannot tell people that it is prohibited to marry at an early age.” – Sheikh Hamoud Hashim al-Tharihi General Secretary of the Vice and Virtue Committee and member of the Islah Party in Yemen. “A nine-year-old girl has the same sexual capacities like a woman of twenty and over. The marriage of nine-year-old girls is not forbidden because according to the Hadith (the Prophet Mohammed’s sayings), Mohammed married Aisha when she was only seven-years-old and he consummated his union when she was nine.” – Sheikh Mohamed Ben Abderrahman Al-Maghraoui Moroccan preacher of Islam. “It is incorrect to say that it’s not permitted to marry off girls who are 15 and younger. A girl aged 10 or 12 can be married. Those who think she’s too young are wrong and they are being unfair to her.” – Sheikh Abdul Aziz Al-Sheikh Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia. “You can have a marriage contract even with a 1-year-old girl, not to mention a girl of 9, 7 or 8. But is the girl ready for sex or not? What is the appropriate age for sex for the first time? This varies according to environment and tradition.” – Dr. Ahmad al-Mu’bi Saudi marriage officiant. “Localized grooming… that refers primarily to groups of Muslim men, who will seek out, find, and then sexually exploit, rape and pimp out young girls, very young girls, between the ages of about eleven and twelve and fifteen, and then use them for sex and for money. The only reliable statistics come through the courts, and that’s the history of convictions, and what they show is that about ninety percent, in fact ninety one percent, of the men convicted are Muslim. Now if you then consider that Muslims officially account for roughly four percent of the British population, if you do the statistics on that, that seems to suggest… that a Muslim man is about two hundred times more likely than a non-Muslim man to commit this crime. The ratio is as steep as that. It is very serious, and it is very difficult to get Muslim organisations to condemn this formally… seventy five percent of those mosques refused to do so…” – Gavin Boby UK lawyer and town planning specialist, director of the British Law and Freedom Centre. “This is a vile culture and if you think for a second that it’s willing to just live in the sands of God’s armpit… you’ve got another thing coming. They want to come and live right where you live, and they think that you’re evil. Extremism believes that it’s okay to strap bombs onto your children and send them to paradise, and whatever else, and to behead people… Your dog, however, can walk side by side, your dog is allowed to have its own dog house… You can send your dog to school to learn tricks, sit, beg, do all that stuff – none of the women have that advantage.” – Gene Simmons Israeli-American rock bass guitarist, singer-songwriter, record producer, entrepreneur, actor, and television personality. “If slaves are treated justly, with full rights, and no oppression whatsoever…why would anyone object?” – Mohammed “Mo” Ansar “Community activist” and a regular guest on the BBC who presents himself as the face of moderate Islam, yet Ansar supports slavery and has promoted extremist organisations such as Hizb ut-Tahrir on social media. “Islam is a serious threat to everyone’s freedom, especially if they’re female, or Jewish, or gay, and it has brought absolutely nothing of value to Western society, all it has done is take, and complain, and cause trouble, and it has made us less tolerant, less civilized, less safe, and less free. If our society is to survive with its core values intact – freedom of speech, freedom of identity, and lots of other essential, healthy, civilized freedoms – then Islam needs to be vigorously and specifically legislated out of all public influence, in all Western countries, permanently.” – Pat Condell Irish writer, standup comedian, and internet atheist personality. “Asked whether suicide bombing can be justified as a measure to defend Islam, 26 percent of American Muslims age eighteen to twenty-nine said yes. That is one quarter of the adult American Muslims under the age of thirty, and no matter how you count the number of Muslims in America (estimates vary from 2 million to 8 million), that is a lot of people.” “To be blunt, their [Western] efforts to assist Muslims and other minorities are futile because, by postponing or at best prolonging the process of their transition to modernity — by creating the illusion that one can hold on to tribal norms and at the same time become a successful citizen — the proponents of multiculturalism lock subsequent generations born in the West into a no-man’s-land of moral values. What comes packaged in a compassionate language of acceptance is really a cruel form of racism. And it is all the more cruel because it is expressed in sugary words of virtue.” “There are many good men and women in the West who try to resettle refugees, scold their fellow citizens for not doing more, donate money to philanthropic organizations, and strive to eliminate discrimination. They lobby governments to exempt minorities from the standards of behaviour of Western societies; they fight to help minorities preserve their cultures, and they excuse their religion from critical scrutiny. These people mean well, I have no doubt. But I believe that their well-intentioned activism is now a part of the very problem they seek to solve.” – Ayaan Hirsi Ali Somali-born ex-Muslim, American (formerly Dutch) activist, writer, and politician. “There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam – and that’s it.” “The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers.” – Recep Tayyip Erdogan Current President of Turkey. “As a universal religion, Islam envisages a global political order in which all humankind will live under Muslim rule as either believers or subject communities. In order to achieve this goal it is incumbent on all free, male, adult Muslims to carry out an uncompromising struggle ‘in the path of Allah,’ or jihad. This in turn makes those parts of the world that have not yet been conquered by the House of Islam an abode of permanent conflict (Dar al-Harb, the house of War) which will only end with Islam’s eventual triumph.” – Efraim Karsh Israeli historian, founding director and emeritus professor of Middle East and Mediterranean Studies at King’s College London. “Allah is our objective. The prophet is our leader. The Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Death in the way of Allah is our highest hope.” – Creed of The Muslim Brotherhood (Jamiat al-Ikhwān al-Muslimūn) International Islamist and terrorist organisation now operating overtly and covertly in over 100 countries around the world, including the United States. The Brotherhood is a global umbrella organisation and has lead to the creation of Al Qaeda, Hamas, the Council on American Islamic Relations, the Muslim American Society, the Muslim Students Association, the Holy Land Foundation, the Islamic Society of North America, the Muslim Society of Britain, as well as countless other front groups. Many of these front groups were listed as un-indicted co-conspirators during the Holy Land Foundation Terror Funding Trial in 2008, and designated as terrorist organisations, yet continue to operate freely today. “It is the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its law (shari’ah) on all nations, and to extend its power to the entire planet.” “If the Jewish state becomes a fact, the Arabs will drive the Jews who live in their midst into the sea.” – Hassan Al-Banna Founder and first General Leader of the Muslim Brotherhood. (14 October 1906 – 12 February 1949). “The process of settlement is a Civilization-Jihadist Process with all the word means. The Brotherhood must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within, sabotaging its miserable house by their own hands, and the hands of the believers, so that it is eliminated – and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” – Mission statement of the Muslim Brotherhood in America Taken from “The Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goals of the Group,” dated May 22nd 1991, this plan was written by one of the top Muslim Brothers in the United States, Mohammed Akram, in reference to the 29 like-minded “organizations of our friends” (Muslim Brotherhood front groups) that shared the common goal of dismantling American institutions and transforming the United States into a Muslim nation. “Those who believe that Islam can flourish and be victorious without Jihad, fighting, and blood are deluded and have no understanding of the nature of this religion.” “This vanguard constitutes the solid base [qaeda in Arabic] for the hoped-for society… We shall continue the jihad no matter how long the way, until the last breath and the last beat of the pulse – or until we see the Islamic state established.” Abdullah Yusuf Azam Founding member of al-Qaeda, member of the Muslim Brotherhood. Palestinian Sunni Islamic scholar and theologian, known as the “Godfather of Global Jihad.” (1941 – 24 November 1989). “There are only three choices in Islam: Either submit, or live under the suzerainty of Islam, or die.” – Osama bin Laden Founding member of al-Qaeda, former Muslim Brotherhood. (March 10, 1957 – May 2, 2011). “If bin Laden is fighting enemies of Islam, I am for him… If he is terrorizing America – the terrorist, biggest terrorist – I am with him. Every Muslim should be a terrorist.” – Zakir Naik Indian Islamic preacher and televangelist, influential Salafi ideologue and founder of the Islamic Research Foundation. A board member of the London based “Islamic Education and Research Academy.” “If terrorism is to throw terror into the heart of your enemy and the enemy of Allah, then we thank Him, the Most Merciful, the Most Compassionate, for enabling us to be terrorists.” – Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Member of al-Qaeda and the principle architect of the 9/11 attacks. Detained at Guantanamo Bay. Joined the Muslim Brotherhood aged 16. “You must also appreciate, as you take over the presidency of America… that you are neither facing individuals nor organisations, but are facing a Jihadi awakening and renaissance which is shaking the pillars of the entire Muslim world; and this is the fact which you, and your government, and your country refuse to recognise and pretend not to see.” – Ayman al-Zawahiri Al-Qaeda second in command, message to Barrack Obama, 19 November 2008. Member of the Muslim Brotherhood and Egyptian Islamic Jihad. (Current leader of Al-Qaeda 2011 – present.) “Throughout history, Allah has imposed upon the Jews people who would punish them for their corruption. The last punishment was carried out by Hitler, by means of all the things he did to them – even though they exaggerated this issue – he managed to put them in their place. This was divine punishment for them. Allah willing, the next time will be at the hands of the believers.” – Imam Yusuf Al-Qaradawi Spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood. “You see, it’s been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. The Mohammedan religion [Islam] too would have been more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness? Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers – already, you see, the world had already fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing Christianity – then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so.” “The only religion I respect is Islam. The only prophet I admire is the Prophet Mohammed.” – Adolf Hitler Austrian-born German politician, leader of the National Socialist German Workers Party, “Führer” (leader) of Nazi Germany from 1934 to 1945. Author of “Mein Kampf” – the number 2 best-seller in many Arab nations, second only to the Qur’an. “Arabs, rise as one man and fight for your sacred rights. Kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases God, history, and religion. This saves your honor. God is with you.” – Hajj Amin al Husseini, speaking on German Nazi radio. The effective world leader of Sunni Islam during WWII and Grand Mufti of Jerusalem – a close personal friend and guest of Hitler and Himmler – he personally raised two Muslim Divisions of Waffen-SS. The Holocaust was also his original idea and he visited Auschwitz on a number of occasions to check on the progress of his plan, which he persuaded onto the Nazis. Husseini was the core initiator of the Palestine-Israel conflict and the uncle of Yasser Arafat. “Israel will exist, and continue to exist, until Islam will obliterate it – just as it has obliterated others before it.” – Hamas charter Ḥarakat al-Muqāwamah al-ʾIslāmiyyah – Islamic Resistance Movement. A Palestinian militant Islamic movement, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood and widely recognized as a terrorist organisation. “Islam is the most anti-Semitic, genocidal ideology in the world. Terrorists don’t spring from ‘perversions of Islam’ but from the religion itself. I do not believe in the idea of a moderate Islam… there is no moderate Islam; there is no extreme Islam; Islam is Islam.” “Telling the truth is the new hate-speech.” – Pamela Geller American political activist, commentator, author and blogger, creator of Atlas Shrugs and Gates of Vienna. Banned from entering the United Kingdom. “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.” – Omar M. Ahmad Founder of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR.) CAIR has numerous, demonstrable, proven ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and was listed as a co-conspirator during the Holy Land Foundation Terror Funding Trial 2008 – helping to fund terrorist groups such as Hamas. Designated as a terrorist organisation by the United Arab Emirates, along with several other Muslim Brotherhood front groups. “I want to see the U.S become an Islamic nation.” – Ibrahim Hooper CAIR national communications director and spokesperson. “Greater integration between Islam and the West depends on incorporation of Sharia law into the legal systems of Europe and the U.S.” – Faisal Abdul Rauf New York Imam, author, and activist. “I am a traitor to America because my religion requires me to be. We pledge to wage jihad for the rest of our lives until either we implant Islam all over the world or meet our Lord as bearers of Islam.” – Samir Khan Pakistani American editor and publisher of Inspire magazine, an English-language online magazine reported to be published by al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). “The Muslim Brotherhood fifth column must be routed out of our government. This is madness! We’ve let them penetrate every national security and intelligence agency… It’s the same as the communists in the thirties, forties and fifties – that’s where we are today.” “Until you recognize that Islam is a political movement, masquerading as a religion, you’re never gonna come to grips with it. The Obama administration has a strategy, it’s very simple, any thinking American should be able to grasp it: It’s anti-American, anti-Western, it’s pro-Islamic, pro-Iranian, and pro-Muslim brotherhood.” – Admiral James “Ace” Lyons Retired Admiral in the United States Navy who served as Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet from 1985-87. “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” – Barack Hussein Obama 44th and current President of the United States of America. “…It [Islam] is a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers for the purpose of establishing a societal model that is absolutely incompatible with Western society… because of media and general government unwillingness to face the sources of Islamic terrorism these things remain largely unknown.” “Our whole political discourse about these issues is deformed by this denial and wilful ignorance, and so it must end. I ask you whatever your situation, whatever your activities, whatever you are doing in life, however politically involved you are, that you do not allow the political candidates you support, of either party, to continue with this suicidal denial and wilful ignorance, and that we together begin to demand of those who represent us that they speak realistically about this threat, and deal with it realistically, and formulate honest and effective ways to contain it,because it can be done. It is not as if we have to sit back and watch them grow. But, this unreality is going to be the death of us, if we do not dispel it. And right now, that is absolutely our responsibility – nobody else is going to do it for us. It is up to us in whatever our situation, to tell our friends, tell our neighbors – inform everyone around us of what is really going on, and work to dispel this folly.” – Robert Spencer American author, critic of Islam and creator of Jihad Watch. Banned from entering the United Kingdom. “America also failed to recognize this hatred throughout all the attacks launched against it, beginning with the marine barracks bombing in Beirut in 1983 all the way up to September 11, 2001. It was that horrible day that made Americans finally ask,What is jihad? And why do they hate us? I have a very simple answer for them: Because you are infidels.” “We, as infidels in the eyes of our enemy, need to understand the danger we face: A totalitarian ideology – whether its origin is mainstream or marginal – threatens to enslave, dominate, and murder us in order to realize its vision for global conquest.” “It is time to throw political correctness in the garbage where it belongs.” – Brigitte Gabriel Lebanese American journalist, author, social commentator, and activist. Survivor of the Lebanon Civil War. “We have an enemy that is not at the gates, we have an enemy that is in the gates. And we must stand strong and resolute to defeat this enemy. This is an enemy that has been fighting against Western civilization for almost fourteen hundred years. Trace it back… dig up Charles Martel, who defeated them at the Battle of Tours, in 732. Talk to the Venetian sailors, at the Battle of Lepanto 1571. Talk to the Germanic and the Polish knights at the Gates of Vienna, 1683. This is just a new chapter in an ongoing battle for freedom and liberty, against one of the most vicious, vile and violent ideologies that the world has ever known. And if we don’t have men and women on Capitol Hill and in the White House, that will clearly identify this enemy, then we’re not going to be successful.” – Lt. Col (ret) Allen West Retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel, former member of the United States House of Representatives, member of the Republican Party. “These future United States presidents questioned the ambassador as to why his (Islamic) government was so hostile to the new American republic even though America had done nothing to provoke any such animosity. Ambassador Adja answered them, as they reported to the Continental Congress, ‘that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise.” – Thomas Jefferson U.S. president addressing the Continental Congress about the brutal pirate attacks of the Muslim Ottoman Barbary (1801–1805 and 1815). “During the thousand years that included the careers of the Frankish soldier and the Polish king, the Christians of Asia and Africa proved unable to wage successful war with the Moslem conquerors; and in consequence Christianity practically vanished from the two continents; and today nobody can find in them any “social values” whatever, in the sense in which we use the words, so far as the sphere of Mohammedan influence. There are such “social values” today in Europe, America, and Australia only because during those thousand years the Christians of Europe possessed the warlike power to do what the Christians of Asia and Africa had failed to do – that is, to beat back the Moslem invader.” – Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt 26th President of the United States “The command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective… by fraud, or by force. In the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar, the Egyptian, combining the powers of transcendent genius, with the preternatural energy of a fanatic, and the fraudulent spirit of an impostor, proclaimed himself as a messenger from Heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. Adopting from the sublime conception of the Mosaic Law, the doctrine of one omnipotent God; he connected indissolubly with it, the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle. He (Muhammad) poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. The essence of his doctrine was violence and lust: to exalt the brutal over the spiritual part of human nature.” – John Quincy Adams American statesman who served as the sixth President of the United States from 1825 to 1829. “Nor can the Plundering of Infidels be in that sacred Book [the Qur’an] forbidden, since it is well known from it, that God has given the World, and all that it contains, to his faithful Mussulmen, who are to enjoy it of Right as fast as they conquer it.” – Benjamin Franklin American revolutionary, diplomat, inventor and one of the Founding Fathers of the United States (January 17, 1706 – April 17, 1790). “How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog,there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities – but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.” – Sir Winston Churchill, 1899. British Conservative politician and statesman, Prime Minister of Great Britain during the Second World War. “The Quran… an accursed book. So long as there is this book, there will be no peace in the world.” – William Ewart Gladstone Prime Minister of the United Kingdom four times between 1868 and 1894 (1809–1898). “The penalty for apostasy in Islamic law is death. Islam is conceived as a polity, not just as a religious community. It follows therefore that apostasy is treason. It is a withdrawal, a denial of allegiance as well as of religious belief and loyalty. Any sustained and principled opposition to the existing regime or order almost inevitably involves such a withdrawal.” – Bernard Lewis British-American historian, scholar in Oriental studies, and political commentator. “Over a billion people believe in Allah without truly knowing what Allah supposedly stands for or what he really demands of them. And the minority that do understand continue to be Moslems because they have redefined their morality and ethics to fit within the teachings of Islam, which are floridly lacking in morality. They therefore redefine what is good and evil in order to fit their lives into what is preached by Islam, instead of examining Islam to see if it fits within the good life. Backwards thinking, imposed by a backward religion.” – Professor Bertrand Russell British philosopher, logician, mathematician, historian, and social critic (18 May 1872 – 2 February 1970). “Some, indeed, dream of an Islam in the future, rationalised and regenerate. All this has been tried already, and has miserably failed. The Koran has so encrusted the religion in a hard unyielding casement of ordinances and social laws, that if the shell be broken the life is gone. A rationalistic Islam would be Islam no longer. The contrast between our own faith and Islam is most remarkable. There are in our Scriptures living germs of truth, which accord with civil and religious liberty, and will expand with advancing civilisation. In Islam it is just the reverse. The Koran has no such teaching as with us has abolished polygamy, slavery, and arbitrary divorce, and has elevated woman to her proper place. As a Reformer, Mahomet did advance his people to a certain point, but as a Prophet he left them fixed immovably at that point for all time to come. The tree (of Islam) is of artificial planting. Instead of containing within itself the germ of growth and adaptation to the various requirements of time and clime and circumstance, expanding with the genial sunshine and rain from heaven, it remains the same forced and stunted thing as when first planted some twelve centuries ago.” – Sir William Muir Scottish Orientalist, scholar of Islam, and colonial administrator (27 April 1819 – 11 July 1905). “Muslims are the first victims of Islam. Many times I have observed in my travels that fanaticism comes from a small number of dangerous men who maintain others in the practice of this religion by terror. To liberate the Muslim from his religion is the best service that one can render him.” – Joseph Ernest Renan French expert of Middle East ancient languages and civilizations (28 February 1823 – 2 October 1892). “I studied the Qur’an a great deal. I came away from that study with the conviction there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as that of Muhammad. So far as I can see, it is the principal cause of the decadence so visible today in the Muslim world and, though less absurd than the polytheism of old, its social and political tendencies are in my opinion to be feared, and I therefore regard it as a form of decadence rather than a form of progress in relation to paganism itself.” – Alexis de Tocqueville, – letter to Arthur de Gobineau, 1843. French political thinker and historian. (29 July 1805 – 16 April 1859). “Consider the Koran…this wretched book was sufficient to start a world-religion, to satisfy the metaphysical need of countless millions for twelve hundred years, to become the basis of their morality and of a remarkable contempt for death, and also to inspire them to bloody wars and the most extensive conquests. In this book we find the saddest and poorest form of theism. Much may be lost in translation, but I have not been able to discover in it one single idea of value.” – Arthur Schopenhauer German philosopher (22 February 1788 – 21 September 1860). “Without demolishing religious schools (madrasas) and minarets (mosques) and without abandoning the beliefs and ideas of the medieval age, restriction in thoughts and pains in conscience will not end. Without understanding that unbelief is a kind of religion, and that conservative religious belief a kind of disbelief, and without showing tolerance to opposite ideas, one cannot succeed. Those who look for the truth will accomplish the mission.” – Mevlana Jalal ad-Din Rumi Persian Sufi poet and philosopher. Sufi’s have been outlawed and persecuted for seven centuries in the Islamic world (1207 – 17 December 1273). “If the people of this religion are asked about the proof for the soundness of their religion, they flare up, get angry and spill the blood of whoever confronts them with this question. They forbid rational speculation, and strive to kill their adversaries. This is why truth became thoroughly silenced and concealed.” – Muhammad ibn Zakariyā Rāzī Persian polymath, physician, alchemist and chemist, philosopher and important figure in the history of medicine. “Do not suppose the statements of the prophets to be true; they are all fabrications. Men lived comfortably till they came and spoiled life. The sacred books are only such a set of idle tales as any age could have and indeed did actually produce. They recite their sacred books, although the fact informs me that these are fiction from first to last. O Reason, thou (alone) speakest the truth. Then perish the fools who forged the religious traditions or interpreted them!” – Al-Ma’arri 11th Century blind Arab philosopher, poet and writer. He labelled religions in general as “noxious weeds” and lay claim that Islam does not have a monopoly on truth. “Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached. God is not pleased by blood – and not acting reasonably is contrary to God’s nature. Faith is born of the soul, not the body. Whoever would lead someone to faith needs the ability to speak well and to reason properly, without violence and threats… To convince a reasonable soul, one does not need a strong arm, or weapons of any kind, or any other means of threatening a person with death.” – Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Palaiologos Conversation between the Emperor and a Persian scholar, 1391. “If Muslim people do not change their mind in spite of the changes of social conditions, and if we supplement Islamic courtesy and law without explaining and advertising real Islamic beliefs at the same time, then it is impossible to save the minds of the people.” – Ma Fuxiang Chinese military and political leader spanning the Qing Dynasty. “… The point is clear in the case of Muhammad. He seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh goads us. His teaching also contained precepts that were in conformity with his promises, and he gave free rein to carnal pleasure. In all this, as is not unexpected, he was obeyed by carnal men. As for proofs of the truth of his doctrine, he brought forward only such as could be grasped by the natural ability of anyone with a very modest wisdom. Nor do divine pronouncements on the part of preceding prophets offer him [Muhammad] any witness. On the contrary, he perverts almost all the testimonies of the Old and New Testaments by making them into fabrications of his own, as can be seen by anyone who examines his law. It was, therefore, a shrewd decision on his part to forbid his followers to read the Old and New Testaments, lest these books convict him of falsity. It is thus clear that those who place any faith in his words believe foolishly. Indeed, the truths that he [prophet Muhammad] taught he mingled with many fables and with doctrines of the greatest falsity. He did not bring forth any signs produced in a supernatural way, which alone fittingly gives witness to divine inspiration; for a visible action that can be only divine reveals an invisibly inspired teacher of truth. On the contrary, Muhammad said that he was sent in the power of his arms—which are signs not lacking even to robbers and tyrants. What is more, no wise men, men trained in things divine and human, believed in him from the beginning. Those who believed in him were brutal men and desert wanderers, utterly ignorant of all divine teaching, through whose numbers Muhammad forced others to become his followers by the violence of his arms.” – St. Thomas Aquinas (Contra Gentiles, Book One, Chapter 6, Paragraph 4) Italian Dominican friar and Catholic priest and an immensely influential philosopher and theologian in the tradition of scholasticism (1225 – 7 March 1274). “Muslims will only live as an oppressive majority and a turbulent minority.” – Dry K D Prithipal Professor of Comparative Religion, University of Alberta. “A nationalist Muslim is only a contradiction in terms.” – Sardar Ballavbhai Patel Indian barrister and statesman, leader of the Indian National Congress and one of founding fathers of the Republic of India (31 October 1875 – 15 December 1950). “The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt, slavery and enmity.” – Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Indian jurist, economist, politician and social reformer (14 April 1891 – 6 December 1956). “This is a profession of faith of a Muslim: ‘I certify that there is no God other than Allah, of whom Mohammed is the only prophet’, which means in effect: After and before Mohammed, there is nobody else…Thus the whole religion of Islam is based on negation: ‘Nobody but us, no other religion but ours’. And if you disagree, you shall die. This puts a serious limitation to tolerance and from this strong belief sprang all the horrors of the Muslim invasion of India. Let it be said right away: the massacres perpetrated by Muslims in India are unparalleled in history, bigger than the holocaust of the Jews by the Nazis; or the massacre of the Armenians by the Turks; more extensive even than the slaughter of the South American native populations by the invading Spanish and Portuguese in early days of America.” – Francois Gautier French writer and journalist based in India. “The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex of order and freedom, culture and peace, can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within.” – Will Durant American writer, historian, and philosopher (November 5, 1885 – November 7, 1981). “From the time Muslims started arriving, around 632 AD, the history of India becomes a long, monotonous series of murders, massacres, spoliations, and destructions.” – Alain Danielou French historian, intellectual, musicologist, Indologist (4 October 1907 – 27 January 1994). “…the number of victims of the persecutions of Hindus by Muslims is easily of the same order of magnitude as that of the Nazi extermination policy, though no one has yet made the effort of tabulating the reported massacres and proposing a reasonable estimate of how many millions exactly must have died in the course of the Islamic campaign against Hinduism (such research is taboo). On top of these there is a similar number of abductions and deportations to harems and slave-markets, as well as centuries of political oppression and cultural destruction…” “The Muslim conquests, down to the 16th century, were for the Hindus a pure struggle of life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and the populations massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign, and similar numbers deported as slaves. Every new invader made (often literally) his hills of Hindus skulls. Thus, the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by the annihilation of the Hindu population; the region is still called the Hindu Kush, i.e. Hindu slaughter.” – Koenraad Elst Belgian orientalist and Indologist. “….eighty million were slaughtered and millions of women were raped… …it was standard practice for Islamic warlords like Ghori and Ghazni to unleash the mass rape and enslavement of hundreds of thousands of women after the slaughter of all males. An extremely large percentage of Muslims in South Asia today are the progeny of forcible conversions and systematic rape campaigns by marauding Muslim invaders.” – Dr. Younis Shaikh Pakistani medical doctor, human rights activist and freethinker. “The Muslim heroes who figure larger than life in our history books committed many dreadful crimes. Mahmud of Ghazni, Qutb-ud-Din Aibak, Balban, Mohammed bin Qasim, and Sultan Mohammad Tughlak, all have blood-stained hands that the passage of years has not cleansed. Indeed, the presence of Muslim historians on their various campaigns has ensured that the memory of their deeds will live long after they were buried…..Seen through Hindu eyes, the Muslim invasion of their homeland was an unmitigated disaster.” – Irfan Husain Pakistani columnist and writer for Dawn. “The inner Muslim feeling of hatred against ‘unbelievers’ has spring up naked and unashamed…. We have seen, revived, as guide in practical politics, the old Muslim religion of the sword…. In thinking of an independent India, the menace of Mohammedan rule has to be considered.” – Annie Besant British socialist, theosophist, women’s rights activist, writer and orator. Party member of the Indian National Congress (1 October 1847 – 20 September 1933). “Religious harmony is a desirable thing. But it takes two to play the game. Unfortunately such a sentiment holds no position in Islamic theology.” – Ram Swarup Independent Hindu thinker and prolific author (1920 – 26 December 1998) “Pakistan and Bangladesh are their fixed deposits. Those are Islamic states. No one else can lay claim on them. India is a joint account. Plunder it as much as you please.” – Shiv Prasad Roy Indian Bengali writer. “I have devoted most of my time during the last six months to the study of Muslim History and Muslim Law and I am inclined to think that Hindu-Muslim unity is neither possible nor practicable… I do honestly and sincerely believe in the necessity and desirability of Hindi-Muslim unity. I am also fully prepared to trust the Muslim leaders, but what about the injunctions of the Koran and Hadiths. The leaders cannot override them.” – Lala Lajpat Rai Indian Punjabi author and politician who is chiefly remembered as a leader in the Indian fight for independence (28 January 1865 – 17 November 1928). “If we go by the lessons of history we have to accept that the goal of the Hindu-Muslim unity is a mirage. When Muslims first entered India, they looted the country, destroyed the temples, broke the idols, raped the women and heaped innumerable indignities on the people of this country. Today it appears that such noxious behavior has entered the bone marrow of Muslims. Unity can be achieved among equals…. I am of the view that Hindu-Muslim unity, which could not be achieved during the last thousand years, will not materialize during the ensuing thousand years.” – Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay Bengali novelist and short story writer (15 September 1876 – 16 January 1938). “A very important factor which is making it almost impossible for Hindu-Muslim unity to become an accomplished fact is that the Muslims cannot confine their patriotism to any one country. I had frankly asked many Muslims whether, in the event of any Mohammedan power invading India, they would stand side by side with their Hindu neighbours to defend their common motherland, I was not satisfied with the reply I got from them.” – Rabindranath Tagore Bengali polymath and Nobel Prize winner in Literature who reshaped Bengali literature and music, as well as Indian art (7 May 1861 – 7 August 1941). “Add the African victims. The Indian victims. The European victims. Add in the Armenian genocide. Then add in the lesser known, but no doubt quite large number of victims of Eastern Asia. Add in the jihad committed by Muslims against China, which was invaded in 651 AD. Add in the Crimean Khanate predations on the Slavs, especially their women. Though the numbers are not clear, what is obvious is that Islam is the greatest murder machine in history bar none, possibly exceeding 250 million dead.Possibly one-third to one-half or more of all those killed by war or slavery in history can be traced to Islam; and this is just a cursory examination. Now consider the over 125 Million women today who have been genitally mutilated for Islamic honor’s sake. Unlike the 20th-century totalitarians whose killing fury consumed themselves, reducing their longevity, Islam paces itself. In the end, though slower, Islam has killed and tortured far more than any other creed, religious or secular. Unlike secular tyranny, Islam, by virtue of its polygamy and sexual predations, reproduces itself and increases. Other tyrannies are furious infections, which burn hot, but are soon overcome. Islam is a slow terminal cancer, which metastasizes, and takes over. It never retreats. Its methods are more insidious, often imperceptible at first, driven by demographics. Like cancer, excision may be the only cure.” – Mike Konrad American writer “I have been made victorious through terror!” – Mohammed (Sahih Bukhari, 4:52.220) Founder and self-proclaimed “prophet” of Islam. _______________________ Edited by John R. Houk Spell check was used. When the quote was attributed to an American author I Americanized the spelling. British authors and English translations of Muslim quotes I retained ‘Civilization Jihad Awareness’’ British spelling Related Vladdi’s Compendium of Quotes about IslamIn “Counterjihad” Civilization Jihad and the Myth of “Moderate” IslamIn “Counterjihad” Deciphering Chain Email on IslamIn “Counterjihad” Here’s some more: “Islam wishes to do away with all states and governments which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam. The purpose of Islam is to set up a state on the basis of this ideology and program, regardless of which nation assumes the role of standard-bearer of Islam, and regardless of the rule of which nation is undermined in the process of the establishment of an ideological Islamic state. Islam requires the earth — not just a portion, but the entire planet…” – Maududi – dajjal September 2, 2015 at 11:46 PM Reblogged this on Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back and commented: See to it, by God, that you read every paragraph of this most excellent and important post. Take it to heart and heed it. Share it with your ignorant family and friends. Herein is vitally important knowledge and wisdom. More: Recall Khomeini’s words during his 1980 speech in Qom, the Shi’ite spiritual hub: “We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land burn. I say let this land [Iran] go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world.” ……. Ali Gomaa, the grand mufti of Egypt, the highest Muslim religious authority in the world, supports murdering non-Muslims. In the daily Al Ahram (April 7, 2008), he said, “Muslims must kill non-believers wherever they are unless they convert to Islam.” He also compares non-Muslims to apes and pigs. Source: … Muhammad Sayyid Al Tantawi, president of Al Azhar University (the most prominent and authoritative institute of Islamic jurisprudence in the world) also approves of killing and maiming Christians, Jews, and other infidels. He added, “This is not my personal view. This what the Shari’a Law says, the law of Allah, the only valid law on the earth.” Source: … And here you have it from the biggest terrorist of all time: “I have been made victorious with terror” – The Prophet Muhammad (Hadith Bukhari 4:52:220 – Islamic scripture) “Indeed in the Prophet Muhammad you have a good example to follow”. – The Quran (Surah Al-Ahzab, Verse 21) … Syed Abul Ala Maududi, founder of the Pakistani political party Jamaat-e-Islami, said non-Muslims have “absolutely no right to seize the reins of power in any part of God’s earth nor to direct the collective affairs of human beings according to their own misconceived doctrines.” If they do, “the believers would be under an obligation to do their utmost to dislodge them from political power and to make them live in subservience to the Islamic way of life.” Source: … The Chief Justice of Saudi Arabia, Sheikh abdullah bin Muhammad bin Humaid teaches that “at first fighting was forbidden, then it was permitted, and after that it was made obligatory.” He clearly identifies two groups Muslims are obligated to fight: “(1) they who start fighting against Muslims, and (2) they who worship gods other than Allah.” Source: … The most prominent Muslim scholar of the 20th century, Sheikh Abu Ala Maududi, stated in his book, Islamic Law and Constitution, on p. 262, that the Islamic State “seeks to mould every aspect of life and activity. In such a state no one can regard any field of his affairs as personal and private. Considered from this aspect the Islamic State bears a kind of resemblance to the Fascist and Communist states.” Maududi added “Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam.” Source: … Hasan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood (the largest international Islamic organization in the world) wrote, “Islam is an all-embracing concept which regulates every aspect of life, adjudicating on every one of its concerns and prescribing for it a solid and rigorous order.” Hasan al-Banna acknowledged there are many levels of jihad, including mere “interior spiritual struggle,” which he deemed the lowest level. According to al-Banna, waging warfare against the infidels is the highest expression of fidelity. Source: Hasan al-Banna also wrote, “it is a duty incumbent on every Muslim to struggle towards the aim of making every people Muslim and the whole world Islamic, so that the banner of Islam can flutter over the earth and the call of the Muezzin can resound in all the corners of the world.” Now remember, this is the founder of the largest international Muslim organization in the world. … Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mufti, Sheikh Abdulaziz Bin Abdullah Bin Mohammed al Sheikh said on Iqra’ TV channel, “Killing producers who show women unveiled is legal.” Source: The Saudi Sheikh Saleh Al-Lehadan, head of the Supreme Judiciary Council, told Al Watan Daily, (March 5, 2008) “After getting rid of the Jews in our Arab land, we must turn to the Christians. They have three options: either they convert to Islam, or leave, or pay Jizia (protection taxes).” Source: And source for THAT: Also: 80% of young Turks in Netherlands see nothing wrong with jihad against unbelievers And let’s not forget Voltaire: VOLTAIRE ON ISLAM, MUHAMMAD, AND MUSLIMS: Voltaire found prophet Mohammed grotesque in character and conduct. In his tragedy Le Fanatisme ou Mahomet, Voltaire described Mohammed as an “impostor”, a ” false prophet”, a “fanatic” and a “hypocrite”. Voltaire defended the play, he said that he “tried to show in it into what horrible excesses fanaticism, led by an impostor, can plunge weak minds”. When Voltaire wrote in 1742 to César de Missy, he described Mohammed as a “deceitful character.” In 1748, after having read Henri de Boulainvilliers and George Sale, he wrote again about Mohammed and Islam in an article, “De l’Alcoran et de Mahomet” (On the Quran and on Mohammed). In the article, Voltaire maintained that Mohammed was a “sublime charlatan” and wrote that furthermore he was not an illiterate. Drawing also on complementary information in the “Oriental Library” of Herbelot, Voltaire, according to René Pomeau, had a judgement of Qur’an where he found the book in spite of “the contradictions, the absurdities, the anachronisms”, “rhapsody, without connection, without order, and without art”. Thus he “henceforward conceded” that “if his book was bad for our times and for us, it was very good for his contemporaries, and his religion even more so. It must be admitted that he removed almost all of Asia from idolatry” and that “it was difficult for such a simple and wise religion, taught by a man who was constantly victorious, could hardly fail to subjugate a portion of the earth.” He considered that “its civil laws are good; its dogma is admirable which it has in common with ours” but that “his means are shocking; deception and murder”. In his play about Moe, Voltaire continues about Islam that “Nothing is more terrible than a people who, having nothing to lose, fight in the united spirit of rapine and of religion.” In a 1740 letter to Frederick II of Prussia, Voltaire ascribes to Muhammad a brutality that “is assuredly nothing any man can excuse” and suggests that his following stemmed from superstition and lack of enlightenment. Voltaire continued in his letter, “But that a camel-merchant should stir up insurrection in his village; that in league with some miserable followers he persuades them that he talks with the angel Gabriel; that he boasts of having been carried to heaven, where he received in part this unintelligible book, each page of which makes common sense shudder; that, to pay homage to this book, he delivers his country to iron and flame; that he cuts the throats of fathers and kidnaps daughters; that he gives to the defeated the choice of his religion or death: this is assuredly nothing any man can excuse, at least if he was not born a Turk, or if superstition has not extinguished all natural light in him.” – Referring to Muhammad, in a letter to Frederick II of Prussia (December 1740), published in Oeuvres complètes de Voltaire, Vol. 7 (1869), edited by Georges Avenel, p. 105. In a 1745 letter recommending his play Fanaticism, or Mahomet to Pope Benedict XIV, Voltaire described the founder of Islam, Muhammad as “the founder of a false and barbarous sect” and “a false prophet.” Voltaire wrote that “Your holiness will pardon the liberty taken by one of the lowest of the faithful, though a zealous admirer of virtue, of submitting to the head of the true religion this performance, written in opposition to the founder of a false and barbarous sect. To whom could I with more propriety inscribe a satire on the cruelty and errors of a false prophet, than to the vicar and representative of a God of truth and mercy?”

Originally posted on The NeoConservative Christian Right:

This is a collected series of quotes from Counterjihadists, Muslims and historical figures which demonstrate the dangers of the theopolitical ideology known as Islam.

This was put together by pseudonymous Civilization Jihad Awareness and posted on the Google+ Group Americans Against Jihad as well as the anonymous person’s Google+ page.

JRH 9/2/15

Please Support NCCR


Compendium of Quotes about Islam

Gathered by Civilization Jihad Awareness

August 31, 2015 6:17 AM and 6:07 AM

Found on Google + Group – Americans against Jihad

Quotes about Islam

My Fellow Kafirs

This is a massive compendium of quotes I’ve been able to gather about Islam. (Be advised, it is a lengthy read.) I have gathered quotes from Muslims, ex-Muslims, Presidents, Prime Ministers, politicians, historians, scholars, authors, writers, journalists, activists, and all manner of famous public figures. I think this is enough to convince even the most closed minded and brainwashed Islamopologist to…

View original 8,576 more words

The future costs of politically correct cultism

July 19, 2015

From HERE:

crackedflagI rarely touch on the subject of political correctness as a focus in my writings, partially because the entire issue is so awash in pundits on either side that the scrambling clatter of voices tends to drown out the liberty movement perspective. Also, I don’t really see PC cultism as separate from the problems I am always battling against: collectivism and the erasure of the individual in the name of pleasing society. Political correctness is nothing more than a tool that collectivists and statists exploit in order to better achieve their endgame, which is conning the masses into believing that the group mind is real and that the individual mind is fiction.

Last year, I covered the PC issue in my article “The twisted motives behind political correctness.” I believe I analyzed the bulk of the issue extensively. However, the times are changing at a pace that boggles the mind; and this is by design. So, it may be necessary to square off against this monstrosity once again.

In order to better examine the true insanity of what many people now term “social justice warriors,” I must study a few aspects separately. First, let’s take a brief look at the mindset of your average social justice circus clown so that we might better understand what makes him/her/it tick.

Rebel without a legitimate cause

I spent several years (up until 2004, when I woke up from the false paradigm madness) as a Democrat. And before anyone judges that particular decision, I would suggest they keep in mind the outright fascist brothel for the military-industrial complex the Republican Party had become at that point and remains to this day. Almost every stepping stone that Barack Obama is using today to eradicate the Constitution was set in place by the Bush dynasty, including the Authorization Of Military Force, which was the foundation for the National Defence Authorization Act and the legal precedence for indefinite detention without trial of any person (including an American citizen) accused of terrorism by the president of the U.S., as well as the use of assassination by executive order.

But, hell, these are real issues — issues that many of my fellow Democrats at the time claimed they actually cared about. Today, though, liberal concerns about unconstitutional actions by the federal government have all but vanished. Today, the left fights the good fight against flags on the hoods of cars from long-canceled television shows and battles tooth and nail for the “right” of boys wearing wigs and skirts to use the girl’s bathroom. Today, the left even fights to remove the words “boy” and “girl” from our vocabulary. Yes, such noble pursuits as these will surely be remembered as a pinnacle in the annals of societal reform.

Maybe I realize the ideological goals of the social justice machine are meaningless on a surface level; and maybe you realize this, too. But these people live in their own little universe, which doesn’t extend far beyond the borders of their college campuses, the various Web forums they have hijacked and a trendy Marxist wine-and-swinger party here and there in New York or Hollywood. They actually think that they are on some great social crusade on par with the civil rights movements of the mid-1900s. They think they are the next Martin Luther King Jr. or the next Gandhi. The underlying banality and pointlessness of their cause completely escapes them. The PC cult is, in many respects, the antithesis of the liberty movement. We fight legitimate threats against legitimate freedoms; they fight mostly imaginary threats and seek to eradicate freedoms.

Don’t get me wrong; sometimes our concerns do align. For instance, liberty proponents fight back against the militarization of police just as avidly as leftists do, if not more so. But our movements handle the problem in very different ways. Look at Ferguson, Missouri, where anyone with any sense should be able to admit that the government response to protests was absolutely a step toward tyranny, ignoring violent looters while attacking peaceful activists. Leftists and PC cultists decided to follow the Saul Alinsky/communist playbook, busing in provocateurs from Chicago to further loot and burn down businesses even if they belonged to ethnic minorities. In the meantime, the liberty movement and Oath Keepers sent armed and trained men to defend those businesses regardless of who owned them and defied police and federal agents who tried to stop them.

The left gave the police and government a rationale for being draconian, while we removed the need for police and government entirely by providing security for the neighborhood (killing two birds with one stone). Either their methods are purely ignorant and do not work, or their methods are meant to achieve the opposite of their claims. In the end, the PC movement only serves establishment goals toward a fully collectivist and centralized society.

Your average PC drone does not understand the grander plan at work, nor does he want to. All he cares about is that he has found a “purpose” — a fabricated purpose as a useful idiot for power brokers, but a purpose nonetheless.

People must be forced to bake gay cakes

I personally do not care if two people of the same gender want to be in a relationship, but I do find the issue of gay marriage (and marriage in general) a rather odd conflict that misses the whole point. Marriage has been and always will be a religious institution, not federal; and I find government involvement in this institution to be rather despicable. When the Supreme Court’s decision on gay marriage came down, I felt a little sorry for all the joyfully hopping homosexuals on the marbled steps of the hallowed building, primarily because they essentially were fighting for the state to provide recognition and legitimacy for their relationships. Frankly, who gives a rip what the state has to say in terms of your relationships or mine? The state is an arbitrary edifice, a facade wielding illusory power. If a relationship is based on true and enduring connection, then that is a marriage of sorts, whether the Supreme Court says so or not.

The only advantage to solidifying gay marriage in the eyes of the state is the advantage of being able to then use the state as an attack dog in order to force religious institutions to accept the status of gays in the same way the government does. And unfortunately, this is exactly what the PC cult is doing.

Should an individual, organization or business be allowed to refuse service to anyone for any reason? Should the state be allowed to force people into servitude to one group or another even if it is against their core values?

PC champions desperately try to make these questions a matter of “discrimination” alone. But they are more about personal rights and property and less about “hate speech.” Under natural law, as well as under the constitution, an individual has every right to refuse association with any other person for any reason. If I do not like you, the government does not have the authority to force me to be around you or to work for you. But this line has been consistently blurred over the years. As I’m sure most readers are familiar, the issue of gay cakes seems to arise over and over, as in cases in Colorado and Oregon in which religiously oriented business owners were punished for refusing to provide service for gay customers.

Punishments have included crippling fines designed to put store owners out of business and have even included gag orders restricting the freedom of businesses to continue speaking out against the orientation of customers they have refused.

In order to validate such actions, leftists will invariably bring up segregation as a backdrop for the gay cake debate. “What if the customers were black,” they ask. “Is it OK for a business to be whites only?”

My response? First, to be clear, I am talking specifically about private individuals and businesses, not public institutions as in the argument explored during Brown v. Board of Education. Private and public spaces are different issues with different nuances. I personally believe it is ignorant to judge someone solely on the color of his skin, and sexual orientation is not necessarily an issue to me. But it is equally ignorant for someone to think that the state exists to protect his feelings from being hurt. I’m sorry, but discrimination is a fact of life and always will be as long as individualism exists. The PC cultists don’t just want government recognition of their status; they want to homogenize individualism, erase it and force the rest of us to vehemently approve of that status without question. This is unacceptable.

Your feelings do not matter. They are not superior in importance to the fundamental freedom of each individual to choose his associations.

If a business refuses to serve blacks, or gays, or Tibetans, then, hey, it probably just lost a lot of potential profit. But that should absolutely be the business’s choice and not up to government to dictate. And in the case of “gay discrimination,” I think it is clear that the PC crowd is using the newfound legal victim group status of gays as a weapon to attack religiously based organizations. Make no mistake, this will not end with gay cakes. It is only a matter of time before pressure is brought to bear against churches as well for “discrimination.” And at the very least, I foresee many churches abandoning their 501(c)(3) tax exempt status.

If a group wants fair treatment in this world, that is one thing. I believe a gay person has every right to open his own bakery and bake gay marriage cakes to his little heart’s content. I believe a black person has every right to dislike white people, as some do, and refuse to associate with them or serve them if that’s what he/she wants. I also believe that under natural and constitutional law, a religious business owner is an independent and free individual with the right to choose who he will work for or accept money from. If he finds a customer’s behavior to be against his principles, he should not be forced to serve that person, their feelings be damned.

This is fair.

What is not fair is the use of government by some to gain an advantage over others based on the legal illusion of victim group status. PC cultists want us to think that choice of association is immoral and damaging to the group. I have to say I find them to be far more intolerant and dangerous than the people they claim to be fighting against, and this attitude is quickly devolving into full bore tyranny under the guise of “humanitarianism.”

Gender bending does not make you special

A man shaves his head and eyebrows, straps a plastic bottle to his face, and has his feet surgically modified to resemble flippers: Does this make him a dolphin, and should he be given victim group status as trans-species? I’m going to be brief here because I covered this issue in a previous article, but let’s lay everything on the table, as it were.

PC cultists are clamoring to redefine the fact of gender as an “undefinable” and even discriminatory social perception. No one, no matter how dedicated, will ever be able to redefine gender, unless they have the ability to change their very chromosomes. Nature defines gender, not man; and a man who undergoes numerous surgeries and body-changing steroid treatments will always have the genetics of a man even if he gives the appearance of a woman. Take away the drugs, and no amount of make-up will hide the chest hair growth and deepening voice.

This might be deemed a “narrow” view of gender, and I don’t care. Nature’s view of gender is the only one that counts. Psychological orientations are irrelevant to biological definitions. Are you a man trapped in a woman’s body? Irrelevant. A woman trapped in a man’s body? Doesn’t matter. If we are talking about legal bearings, then biological definitions are the only scale that makes sense. I realize that gender bending is very trendy right now, and Hollywood sure seems to want everyone to jump on that freaky disco bandwagon, but there is no such thing as gender-neutral people. They are not a group, let alone a victim group. There are men, and there are women; these are the only gender groups that count. Whether they would like to be the opposite does not change the inherent genetic definition. Period. To make such foolishness into an ideology is to attempt to bewilder man’s relationship to nature, and this will only lead to disaster.

There is no such thing as ‘white privilege’

A person determines his success in life by his character and his choices. Color does not define success, as there are many people of every color who are indeed successful. Do you have to work harder to gain success because you are brown, or black, or neon green? I’ve seen no concrete evidence that this is the case. I know that people who identify as “white” are still around 70 of the American population, thus there are more white people in successful positions due to sheer numbers.

I know that I personally grew up in a low-wage household and had little to no financial help as I entered the working world. Everything I have accomplished in my life to this point was done alongside people of color, some of whom had far more advantages than I did. I cannot speak for other people’s experiences, but I can say that being white was never more important in my life than being stubborn and dedicated.

I also find it a little absurd that most PC cultists who harp about so-called white privilege are often white themselves and haven’t the slightest experience or insight on what it is to be a person of color anyway. White privilege seems to be the PC cult’s answer to the argument that racism is a universal construct. Only whites can be racist, they claim, because only whites benefit from racism. I defy these jokers to show any tangible proof that an individual white person has more of a chance at success than a person of color due to predominant racism. Or are we just supposed to have blind faith in the high priests of PC academia and their morally relative roots?

The cost of social Marxism

Marxism (collectivism) uses many vehicles or Trojan horses to gain access to political and cultural spaces. Once present, it gestates like cancer. Younger generations are highly susceptible to social trends and are often easily manipulated by popular culture and academic authority, which is why we are seeing PC cultism explode with the millennials and post-millennials. In my brief participation on the left side of the false paradigm, political correctness was only beginning to take hold. A decade later, we have a bewildering manure storm on our hands. The result is a vast division within American society that cannot be mended. Those of us on the side of liberty are so different in our philosophies and solutions to social Marxists that the whole carnival can end only one way: a fight. And perhaps this is exactly what the elites want: left against right, black against white, gay against religious and straight, etc. As long as the PC movement continues to do the bidding of power brokers in their efforts toward the destruction of individual liberty, I see no other alternative but utter conflict.

–Brandon Smith


Re: “their endgame … is conning the masses into believing that the group mind is real and that the individual mind is fiction.”

Yes, endorsing group rights is all about avoiding individual responsibility.


I doubt there will be a fight, because the Makers, by our very natures, CAN NOT RESIST EVIL MEN, simply because we’re trying to hope to collaborate to objectively solve universal problems, while the Takers – the PC (Psychopathic Criminal) negligent, delinquent libertine “liberals” are all focused on their fears, and obsessively “PMS“ing about it all the time – since they don’t believe in winning, they spend all their time trying to not-lose, to prove “I’m better than you!” all the time, by attacking innocent others first.

They are Paranoids (“They’re all out to get me!”) Masochists (“I’d better focus on my fears AS pain, lest I forget to defend myself, since hope is a trick!”) and Slanderers (“Since they’re all out to get me, I’d better get all of them, first!”).

Political correctness (i.e: factual incorrectness) is extortion – fraud and slander – in that it pretends a civil ‘probable’ test applies, based on group-might-made-rights scenarios, to all aspects of life: white males are always to be ‘legally’ and ‘defensively’ pre-judged as “guilty until never proven innocent,” for instance. It’s extortion, and extortion is always a crime!

What sane people call “the slippery slope,” liberals call “progress!”

Political correctness (slanderous victim-blaming factual incorrectness) is both fraud (crime) and extortion – pretending that, either you lie along with the majority, or you’ll be replaced with a better liar by that same majority; group might makes right! Exact same as communazism.

It extorts people to “Go Along” (with criminal lies) “To Get Along” (with criminal liars).

PC pretends one is responsible to other people for their (possibly mistaken) reactions to one’s new ideas, or to ideas which *might* offend them.

And the offense taken, is always subjective.

Since the deliberate use of PC implicitly slanders people AS being offensive, it attacks first, and therefore also inherently defends first-attackers (criminals).

PC implies one can and so should manage or avoid others’ inevitable reactions of denial (automatic ‘offense’) to one’s exchange of ideas, as if one somehow ‘should,’ even if one could, always try to defuse all of their normal psychologically procedural reaction stages (i.e: basic thinking) as summed up by Elizabeth Kubler-Ross.

Normal people WILL REACT to new ideas BY a well-established process of denial to acceptance, so it’s literally outrageous to posit that any one person is responsible for monitoring, or has a duty to actively prevent this common thought process occurring in others.

This thought, or “thesis” (previously “Theosis,” of “knowledge of God”) process, prioritizing focus on the ‘BAD’ (the anti-thesis) in order to avoid it and ultimately test a hypo-thesis, to prove it good (as the final “syn-thesis”) has been historically referred to as “Greek Logic” and called “Hegelian Dialectics,” before Kubler-Ross added her modern speculations to it, but it’s obviously nothing more than basic

So obviously, “Political Correctness” is only an extortion attempt at THOUGHT CONTROL, designed to shield criminals’ crimes, and to prevent everyone from thinking at all, beyond the most shallow and banal trivialities. It defines the willfully ignorant and irresponsible, criminally negligent “victimology” process.

It is to insist (as all authoritarian extortions do) that one must ALWAYS Submit one’s self to the greater (gang’s “might-makes-right”) good.

What is currently misconceived as ‘altruism’ and ‘Hegelian dialectics’ is really only a lie: a slanderous fraud designed to induce perpetual guilt in the victim, by way of the same, ages-old “carrot-and-stick,” fear-and-greed behavioural conditioning binary.

It’s proponents sadistically advocate for perpetual, self-sacrificing masochism in others, demanding they pacifistically agree with the predatory criminal aggressor’s militaristic notion that they have no right to self-defense, nor even to think about planning for it.

To them, if their victims even THINK about planning to defend them selves, it’s “slandering” the criminals AS the aggressors, (which they in fact already ARE, just by dint of their PC extortion-attempts).

Bottom line: criminals hate other people (potential victims and/or potential opponents) thinking about their crimes, just as they hate the admitting to them selves of being criminals.

And hating thinking has always had a perfectly valid label: “Psycho-Path” (literal translation: “Thought-Killer”).


Like I said:

“PC” (Psychotic Criminal) “Liberals” are all about the “PMS” (Paranoid Masochistic Slander).


More European Integration: The Exact Opposite of a Solution

July 19, 2015

From HERE:

While debtors, creditors, and economists focused on the Greek debt crisis, a report by European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker with the heads of four other EU institutions went almost entirely unnoticed. Juncker proposes a predictably awful strategy for solving economic problems, greater centralization of power over the currency union’s economies. It recommended “quick fix” steps that could be introduced in the next two years, such as setting up a common bank deposit insurance system and promoting competitiveness, as well as longer term ideas, such as a common eurozone treasury.

You can see how one might reach such a conclusion. If one entity is going to control the money supply, an economic manipulation tactic often used by governments to smooth over economic problems, then one can see the reason in having that entity exercising greater economic controls over the economic policies that lead to such problems. It doesn’t make a great deal of sense for example, to have Greece spend without regard for consequences, while French and German taxpayers end up on the hook for their irresponsibility.

More European Integration: The Exact Opposite of a Solution

The flaw in this line of thinking however is that it begins with the assumption that the centralization which has already occurred is a good thing. It ignores the fact that said centralization is the only reason French and German taxpayers are on the hook for Greek debt to begin with. If other European countries are unhappy with their being bound to a nation irresponsible enough to address a debt crisis by electing communists, then ceding more control over their economies to a central authority hardly seems like a sound solution.

The proposal is entirely predictable however. “Never let a good crisis go to waste” as they say in Washington. Governments have this terrible habit of rewarding failure. “Oh, you completely failed to accomplish the purpose for which your bureaucracy was created? You must need more money and power”.

Forget the fact that Greek GDP growth was cut roughly in half since entering the Euro. That little piece of evidence would dissuade people from favoring greater centralization. Definitely pay no attention to the fact that the same can be said for Italy, Spain, and Portugal, that would not favor Juncker’s proposal. By the EU’s reasoning, an institution which fails to centrally plan the economies of a single political unit, will somehow be able to centrally plan the economies for an entire continent and beyond.

The search continues for a one-handed economist. Some know-it-all guru who can figure out how a policy change from a single city will impact the economic behaviors of hundreds of millions of people with diverse interests over millions of miles of territory. The problem with such a strategy should seem obvious. There are just too many variables for any man or group of men to even attempt to contemplate.

We all have to make economic decisions every day. Everything from investment strategies to what we eat for dinner. Contemplating the variables for all of these things in each of our own individual lives is very complex, to the point that many of us will hire experts to handle them, and even then there are failures. How one comes to the conclusion that multiplying that complexity by hundreds of millions of times over will somehow simplify the equation, or lead to greater prosperity, simply escapes reason.

In the United States, we often see the deleterious effects of such flawed thinking. It is bad enough when your local government creates some economic policy that might negatively impact your business or favor some competitor. Luckily, you have the option to leave that place. This becomes more difficult when that policy is implemented at the state level, and damn near impossible when it is tackled by the federal government. Let the federal government go and enter into economic treaties with foreign nations, and the problem becomes even more difficult to escape.

This trend toward centralization is fueled at best by ignorance, and at worst by malice. Far from creating greater prosperity, centralization only makes bad policy more difficult to escape. One of two things is true. Either that is the goal of such policies, or the people who claim to be uniquely qualified to dictate the economic behaviors of hundreds of millions of people over millions of miles of territory, are so incompetent that they can’t even see the obviousness of that fact.

Tom Woods gave a great talk about secession earlier this year in Houston. The talk was not specific to economics, but the overall results of large centralized States, versus that of smaller autonomous ones. Unsurprisingly, large centralized states have a terrible habit of bringing immeasurable misery, poverty, and death, while smaller autonomous ones tend to thrive.

The further removed from the individual responsibility becomes, the greater the tragedy that follows. If smaller autonomous nations fare better than large centralized States, how much better off would we all be, if States went away altogether, and individuals were free to make their own choices?

2012 Defense Intelligence Agency document: West will facilitate rise of Islamic State, sees terror group as a “U.S. strategic asset”

May 25, 2015
isis cage

 From here:

This makes my blood run cold.

It ought to make the hair on the back of every American’s neck stand up.
When I wrote as early as 2011 that it was al Qaeda and their proxies that Obama was aiding and abetting in Libya and Syria, it did not occur to me that he considered those bloody savages a ‘strategic asset’ — an ally.
On what planet would the United States of America share an espirit de corp with these monsters?


According to Judicial Watch: ”The document shows that as early as 2012, U.S. intelligence predicted the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL or ISIS), but instead of clearly delineating the group as an enemy, the report envisions the terror group as a U.S. strategic asset.”

This is catastrophic consequence of a foreign (and domestic) policy void of acknowledging and/or understanding the jihad threat. The denial of jihad religious and ideological motivation behind this terrible holy war on the West and secular or ‘heretical’ Muslims, has allowed to metastasize at breaking speed.

Look at what Obama and his party of treason has unleashed on the world.


2012 Defense Intelligence Agency document: West will facilitate rise of Islamic State “in order to isolate the Syrian regime” The Levant report, By Brad Hoff, May 19, 2015

On Monday, May 18, the conservative government watchdog group Judicial Watch published a selection of formerly classified documents obtained from the U.S. Department of Defense and State Department through a federal lawsuit.

While initial mainstream media reporting is focused on the White House’s handling of the Benghazi consulate attack, a much “bigger picture” admission and confirmation is contained in one of the Defense Intelligence Agency documents circulated in 2012: that an ‘Islamic State’ is desired in Eastern Syria to effect the West’s policies in the region.


The DIA report, formerly classified “SECRET//NOFORN” and dated August 12, 2012, was circulated widely among various government agencies, including CENTCOM, the CIA, FBI, DHS, NGA, State Dept., and many others.

The document shows that as early as 2012, U.S. intelligence predicted the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL or ISIS), but instead of clearly delineating the group as an enemy, the report envisions the terror group as a U.S. strategic asset.

While a number of analysts and journalists have documented long ago the role of western intelligence agencies in the formation and training of the armed opposition in Syria, this is the highest level internal U.S. intelligence confirmation of the theory that western governments fundamentally see ISIS as their own tool for regime change in Syria. The document matter-of-factly states just that scenario.

Forensic evidence, video evidence, as well as recent admissions of high-level officials involved (see former Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford’s admissions here and here), have since proven the State Department and CIA’s material support of ISIS terrorists on the Syrian battlefield going back to at least 2012 and 2013 (for a clear example of “forensic evidence”: see UK-based Conflict Armament Research’s report which traced the origins of Croatian anti-tank rockets recovered from ISIS fighters back to a Saudi/CIA joint program via identifiable serial numbers).

The newly released DIA report makes the following summary points concerning “ISI” (in 2012 “Islamic State in Iraq,”) and the soon to emerge ISIS:

  • Al-Qaeda drives the opposition in Syria
  • The West identifies with the opposition
  • The establishment of a nascent Islamic State became a reality only with the rise of the Syrian insurgency (there is no mention of U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq as a catalyst for Islamic State’s rise, which is the contention of innumerable politicians and pundits; see section 4.D. below)
  • The establishment of a “Salafist Principality” in Eastern Syria is “exactly” what the external powers  supporting the opposition want (identified as “the West, Gulf Countries, and Turkey”) in order to weaken the Assad government
  • “Safe havens” are suggested in areas conquered by Islamic insurgents along the lines of the Libyan model (which translates to so-called no-fly zones as a first act of ‘humanitarian war’; see 7.B.)
  • Iraq is identified with “Shia expansion” (8.C)
  • A Sunni “Islamic State” could be devastating to “unifying Iraq” and could lead to “the renewing facilitation of terrorist elements from all over the Arab world entering into Iraqi Arena.” (see last non-redacted line in full PDF view.)


May 20, 2015

1Moecomics5 2MoeComics0 3MoeComics1 4MeComics7 6MoeComics 7MoeComics6

Watch Innocence of Muslims and verify its content

May 19, 2015

From here:

Critical Update 05/18/’15: 9th Circus heard arguments Dec. 15 and ruled today, disolving the injunction. “Innocence Of Muslims” has been uploaded to YouTube, about six hours ago.

I will now attempt to embed the video here, followed by J. Smith’s excellent essay on the sources of the conceptual content.

I learned today that the 9th Circus has begun the appelate process and interrogated the lawyers. While we wait for their decision, we can review the video, just not on YouTube.

I am trying an embed and a link, with a risk that the result will be two links. I could not get proper embed code at metacafe.

The Liveleak version has been edited to remove Garcia’s portrayal of UmmQirfa. The video quality leaves much to be desired. Mercifully, it is short.

In reviewing the trailer, I discover an error which I previously overlooked. The Profit’s given name was Kauthar, not Muhammad, an undeserved honorific title he bestowed upon himself later.

Its International Judge Muhammad Day revisited, and you are on the bench; I am presenting the evidence
which will empower you to assess the veracity of the concepts presented by the video clip entitled “Innocence of Muslims”.  Herein you will find quotes from the Qur’an, hadith, Shari’ah & tafsir linked to source for easy confirmation.  You will also find quotes from Tabari’s Tahrik and Guillaume’s translation of Ishaq’s Sira.  To verify them, go to the topical quotes appendix of . Please review the video, then examine the evidence. Note that I have added emphasis, with yellow highlights to bring out the most important clauses.

Moe is portrayed as a demon possessed lunatic, suicidal, terrorist, pederast, lecher and genocidal, barbarian warlord.  If he was, he blessed sure was not a Messenger of God because God would not hire and retain an unrepentant sinner.  God did not allow King David to build his Temple because of David’s adultery & murder. How could he tolerate a close relationship with a child molester, lecher, murderer and genocidal warlord?

If the central concepts conveyed by “Innocence of Muslims” are valid, then Islam is not of God, it is demonic; a horrific fraud and war crime perpetrated against Muslims and the whole human race.

The video begins with a statement that goes against the grain of every U.N. resolution condemning “defamation of Islam”: “Islam = terrorism.  The statement is either true or false. Are men terrorists with Islam and normal humans without it?  Is Islam the cause of terrorism?  The Qur’an and hadith hold evidence which must be examined to find the answer to this crucial question.

Allah said:

I will cast terror

  • 3:151.
    We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).
  • 3:152.
    And Allâh did indeed fulfil His Promise to you when you were killing them (your enemy) with His Permission; until (the moment) you lost your courage and fell to disputing about the order, and disobeyed after He showed
    you (of the booty) which you love. Among you are some that desire this world and some that desire the Hereafter. Then He made you flee from them (your enemy), that He might test you. But surely, He forgave you,
    and Allâh is Most Gracious to the believers.
  • 8:12.
    (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.”

strike terror

  • 8:57.
    So if you interlock (yourself) with them in War — then by (routing) them strike terror
    in those that are behind them per chance they get admonition.
  • 8:60.
    Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into
    (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of Allah, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.

Allah cast terror

  • 33:26.
    And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
  • 33:27.
  • And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things
  • 59:2.
    He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
    expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).

You scare them more…

  •  59:13.
    Indeed, you strike more terror in their hearts than their fear of God. This is because they are people who do not comprehend.

Allah rewards terrorists

  • 9:120.
    It was not becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the neighbourhood to remain behind Allâh’s Messenger (Muhammad  when fighting in Allâh’s Cause) and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer
    their own lives to his life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness. Surely, Allâh wastes not the reward of the Muhsinûn9:121.
    Nor do they spend anything (in Allâh’s Cause) – small or great – nor cross a valley, but is written to their credit, that Allâh may recompense them with the best of what they used to do (i.e. Allâh will reward their good deeds according to the reward of their best deeds which they did in the most perfect manner).

Moe said:

victorious with terror

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me.

    1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.

    2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.

    3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.

    4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection).

    5. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:Narrated Abu Huraira:Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while
    I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

Allah would cast terror and did cast terror so that people were killed, enslaved and dispossessed. Allah commanded Muslims to strike terror by harsh treatment of defeated victims and by maximizing their military strength.  Allah told Moe that the Jews were more afraid of Moe than of him.  Moe said that he was made victorious by terror.   Allah promised Muslims extra credit towards an upgrade in their seat in his celestial bordello for any act of terrorism.

Moe deliberately constructed a reputation of barbarian rapine so as to terrify his intended victims, compelling them
to surrender without a fight or making them disorganized, scattered, easy prey.  Terrorism is an
intrinsic sacrament of Islam.

Violence against Copts

impunity & complicity

I will leave this matter to an expert: Bill Warner, who compiles the evidence: Bulletin of Christian Persecution July 30 – Aug. 31, 2012.

Demon possession

Did Moe really run home to his wife and hide under her skirt, scared witless?  Sahih Bukhari has the answer to this

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 9, Book 87, Number 111

    Narrated ‘Aisha:

    The commencement of the Divine Inspiration to Allah’s Apostle was in the form of good righteous (true) dreams in his sleep. He never had a dream but that it came true like bright day light. He used to go in seclusion (the cave of) Hira where he used to worship(Allah Alone) continuously for many (days) nights. He used to take with him the journey food for that (stay) and then come
    back to (his wife) Khadija to take his food like-wise again for another period to stay, till suddenly the Truth descended upon him while he was in the cave of Hira. The angel came to him in it and asked him to read. The Prophet replied, “I do not know how to read.” (The Prophet added), “The angel caught me (forcefully) and pressed me so hard that I could not bear it anymore.
    He then released me and again asked me to read, and I replied, “I do not know how to read,” whereupon he caught me again and pressed me a second time till I could not bear it anymore. He then released me and asked me again to read, but again I replied, “I do not know how to read
    (or, what shall I read?).” Thereupon he caught me for the third time and pressed me and then released me and said, “Read: In the Name of your Lord, Who has created (all that exists). Has created man from a clot. Read and Your Lord is Most Generous…up to….. ..that which he
    knew not.” (96.15)

    Then Allah’s Apostle returned with the Inspiration, his neck muscles twitching with terror till he entered upon Khadija and said, “Cover me! Cover me!“ They covered him till his fear was over and then he said, “O Khadija, what is wrong with me?” Then he told her everything that had happened and said, ‘I fear that something may happen to me.” Khadija said, ‘Never! But have the
    glad tidings, for by Allah, Allah will never disgrace you as you keep good reactions with your Kith and kin, speak the truth, help the poor and the destitute, serve your guest generously and assist the deserving, calamity-afflicted ones.” Khadija then accompanied him to (her cousin) Waraqa bin Naufal bin Asad bin ‘Abdul ‘Uzza bin Qusai. Waraqa was the son of her paternal uncle, i.e., her father’s brother, who during the Pre-Islamic Period became a Christian and used to write the Arabic writing and used to write of the Gospels in Arabic as much as Allah wished him to write. He was an old man and had lost his eyesight. Khadija said to him, “O my cousin! Listen to the story of
    your nephew.” Waraqa asked, “O my nephew! What have you seen?” The Prophet described whatever he had seen.

    Waraqa said, “This is the same Namus (i.e., Gabriel, the Angel who keeps the secrets) whom Allah had sent to Moses. I wish I were young and could live up to the time when your people would turn you out.” Allah’s Apostle asked, “Will they turn me out?” Waraqa replied in the affirmative and  said: “Never did a man come with something similar to what you have brought but was treated with hostility. If I should remain alive till the day when you will be turned out then I would support you strongly.” But after a few days Waraqa died and the Divine Inspiration was also paused for a while and the Prophet became so sad as we have heard that he intended several times to throw himself from the tops of high mountains and every time he went up the top of a mountain in order to throw himself down, Gabriel would appear before him and say, “O Muhammad! You are indeed Allah’s Apostle in truth” whereupon his heart would become quiet and he would calm down
    and would return home. And whenever the period of the coming of the inspiration used to become long, he would do as before, but when he used to reach the top of a mountain, Gabriel would appear before him and say to him what he had said before. (Ibn ‘Abbas said regarding the meaning of: ‘He it is that Cleaves the daybreak (from the darkness)’ (6.96) that Al-Asbah. means the light of the sun during the day and the light of the moon at night).

  • Ibn Sa’d Volume 1, Parts 1.51.1Muhammad Ibn `Umar informed us; he said: Yunus Ibn Muhammad Ibn Fudalahal-Zafari related to me on the authority of his father; (second chain) he (Ibn Sa’d)

    said: Kathir Ibn Zayd related to me on the authority of al-Muttalib Ibn ‘Abd Allah Ibn Hantab; they said:

    The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, had seen his people departing from him.

    He was one day sitting alone when he expressed a desire: I wish, Allah had not revealed to me
    anything distasteful to them. Then the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, approached them (Quraysh) and got close to them, and they also came near to him. One day he was sitting in their assembly near the Ka`bah, and he recited: “By the Star when it setteth”, (Qur’an, 53:1) till he reached, “Have ye thought upon

    Al-Uzza and Manat, the third, the other”. (Qur’an, 53:19-20) Satan made him repeat these two phrases: These idols are high and their intercession is expected. The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, repeated them, and he went on reciting the whole surah and then fell in prostration, and the people also fell in prostration with him. Al-Walid Ibn al-Mughirah, who was an old man and could not prostrate, took a handful of dust to his forehead and prostrated on it.

    It is said: Abu Uhayhah Sa’id Ibn al-‘As, being an old man, took dust and prostrated on it. Some people say: It was al-Walid who took the dust; others say: It was Abu Uhayhah; while others say: Both did it. They were pleased with what the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, had uttered. They said: We know that Allah gives life and causes death. He creates and gives us provisions, but our deities will intercede with Him, and in what you have assigned to them, we are with you. These words pricked the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him. He was sitting in his house and when it was evening, Gabriel, may peace be on him, came to him and revised the surah. Then Gabriel said: Did I bring these two phrases. The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, said: I ascribed to Allah, what He had not said.

    Then Allah revealed to him: “And they indeed strove hard to beguile thee (Muhammad) away from that
    wherewith We have inspired thee, that thou shouldst invent other than it against Us; and then would they have accepted thee as a friend.

    And if We had not made thee wholly firm thou mightest almost have inclined unto them a little.

    Then had We made thee taste a double (punishment) of living and a double (punishment) of dying then hadst thou found no helper against Us. (Al-Qur’an, 17:73-75. This narration is not acceptable, because none of the first narrators is a Companion. For a detailed discussion see Shibli, Sirat al-Nabi, 1st edition, p. 176)

  • 22:52.
    Never did We send a Messenger or a Prophet before you, but; when he did recite the revelation or
    narrated or spoke, Shaitân (Satan) threw (some falsehood) in it.
    But Allâh abolishes that which Shaitân (Satan) throws in. Then Allâh establishes His Revelations. And Allâh is All-Knower, All-Wise:

Great Slaughter

Does God desire great slaughter, or does genocide come from Satan’s corner?  Allah made great slaughter Moe’s price of admission to his celestial bordello.

  • 8:67.
    It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.


  • Ibn Sa’d Volume 1, Parts 1.45.4‘Affan Ibn Muslim informed us: Hammad Ibn Salamah informed us on the
    authority of Hisham Ibn ‘Urwah, he on the authority of ‘Urwah: Verily, the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, said:O Khadijah, I see light and hear sounds and I fear I shall be a sooth-sayer.

    Verily, Allah will not do it with you, 0 son of `Abd Allah. Verily, you
    speak the truth,

    return things entrusted to you and fulfil (obligations of) relationship.

  • She said:
  • Ibn Sa’d Volume 1, Parts 1.45.5 Yahya 1bn Abbad and `Affan Ibn Muslim informed us; they said: Hammad Ibn Salamah informed us; he said: Ammar Ibn Abi `Ammar informed us; (variation)Yahya Ibn `Abbád (only) said: Hammad Ibn Salamah said: I think (he narrated) on the authority of Ibn `Abbas:

    Verily, the Prophet, may Allah bless him, said: O Khadijah I hear sounds and see light and I fear I am mad.

    She said: O son of `Abd Allah ! Allah will not do it with you. Then she approached Waraqah Ibn Nawfal and related (the incident) to him.

    He said: If he is true, then he is nomos as in the case of Moses. If I am alive, when he is commissioned (to prophethood) I shall support him, help him and believe in him.


The story of Moe’s child bride is well represented in the authentic hadith collections, compiled in this pdf file:,
I will reproduce one of them here, linked to the source; you can easily find the others by reading the surrounding ahadith and using your favorite hadith search engine to find the rest.

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64

    Narrated ‘Aisha:

    that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his
    marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with
    him for nine years (i.e., till his death).

  • The Life of Muhammad, page 311 [Image #180 in the on line archive]. In the riwaya of Yunus I. I. recorded
    that the apostle saw her (Ummu’I-Fadl when she was a baby crawling before him and said, ‘If she grows up and
    I am still alive I will marry her.’ But he died 
    before she grew up and Sufyan b. al-Aswad b. ‘ Abdu’I-Asad al-Makhzumi married her and she bore him Rizq and Lubaba. . . .

Donkey interview

Yeah, right, Moe asked questions of a donkey and got answers.  This story is one measure of his insanity and the
credulity of Muslims.  For the full story, see:
This OCR result from the Encyclopedia of Canonical Hadith  is a bit rough, but you can get the gist of the story. The story is on page 76 of the pdf file, page 41 of the text.

  •, Hydera bad 1970, II, pp. 302 f.In one version it was the Prophet who asked the donkey: ‘What is your name?’ ‘ Ya zd b. Shihb’, the don key is said to have answered. Thereupon the Prophet said: ‘But I shall call you Ya fr.’ When it was offered a
    she-ass, it declined. In an other version it was the donkey that began the conversation, telling the Prophet that it was once owned by a Jew.

    Since it made a habit of stumbling on purpose, so that its master fell off, it was refused food and it was regularly given the stick. As the last surviving donkey of his grandfather’s sixty off spring, which had all been
    used in the past by prophets as riding animals, it was now prepared to serve him, the Prophet of Islam, the seal of the prophets. Muhammad used to ride it, and when he was in need of supplies, he used to release it and send it away to the shop of a merchant on whose door it would knock with its head. In a variant: ‘… and when the owner of the store came outside, the donkey would give him a token with its head that he was to love the Messenger of God: ‘A ibba rasla ’llh!’ In a variant we read here: ‘Ajib rasla ’llh!, respond to the Messenger of God!’ When the Prophet died, the donkey went to the well of Ab ’l-Hay tham b. at-Tayyihn and threw itself down there in out of grief, and thus that well became its grave. But, as all versions assert, there was no truth in the story of course and its isnad strand was no good anyhow.

    In Ij., Li sn, ibidem, Ibn al-Jawz is quoted as saying laana ’llhu w iahu!, i.e. may God curse the fabricator of this tradition! For a very detailed study of the asses and mules which are associated with the Prophet, see H. Eisenstein’s paper in Der Is lam, LXII, 1985, pp. 98-107.

  • Tabari Volume VIII, Page 131In this year Hatib b. Abi Balta’ah came back from al-Muqawqisbringing Mariyah and her sister Sirin, his female mule Duldul, his donkey Ya’fur, and sets of garments. With the two women al-Muqawqis had sent a eunuch, and the latter stayed with them.

    Hatib had invited them to become Muslims before he arrived with them, and Mariyah and her sister did so. The Messenger of God lodged them with Umm Sulaym bt. Milhan. Mariyah was beautiful.

    The Prophet sent her sister Sirin to Hassan b. Thabit, and she bore him ‘Abd al-Rahman b. Hassan.

A provincial ruler whom Moe intimidated gave Moe two Christian slaves, the talking donkey and other goods in tribute to appease him and stave off conquest.  Moe gave one slave away and kept the other, assigning her to Hafsa, one of his wives.


It would seem that, after Jesus brought a new dispensation, with celibacy instead of lechery, celibacy would be the model for future prophets.  But not for our hero, Moe.  Moe had nine wives at once and used to divide his time between them. You saw a dramatization of his tryst with Mariyah, a slave who was given to him as tribute, in Hafsa’s bed, on her turn.  Did that really happen?  Would I bring it up here if it did not? Sunan an-Nasa’i holds a clue for you.

  • # 3411 It
    was narrated from Anas,that the Messenger of Alllah had a female slave with whom he had intercourse, but ‘Aisha and Hafsa would not leave him alone until he said that she was forbidden for him. Then Allah, the Mighty and Sublime. revealed: “O Prophet!Why do you forbid (for yourself) that which Allah has allowed to until the end of .the Verse. (sahih)
  • 66:1. O Prophet! Why do you ban (for yourself) that which Allâh has made lawful to you, seeking to please your wives?
    And Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.66:2. Allâh has already ordained for you (O men), the dissolution of your oaths. And Allâh is your Maula (Lord, or Master, or Protector, etc.) and He is the All-Knower, the All-Wise.66:3. And (remember) when the Prophet (PBUH) disclosed a matter in confidence to one of his wives (Hafsah), so when she told it (to another i.e. ‘Aishah), and Allâh made it known to him, he informed part thereof and left a part. Then when he told her (Hafsah) thereof, she said: “Who told you this?” He said: “The All-Knower, the All-Aware (Allâh) has told me”.

    66:4. If you two (wives of the Prophet , namely ‘Aishah and Hafsah) turn in repentance to Allâh, (it will be better for you), your hearts are indeed so inclined (to oppose what the Prophet  likes), but if you help one another against him (Muhammad ), then verily, Allâh is his Maula (Lord, or Master, or Protector, etc.), and Jibrael (Gabriel), and the righteous among the believers, and furthermore, the angels are his helpers.

    66:5. It may be if he divorced you (all) that his Lord will give him instead of you, wives better than you, Muslims (who submit to Allâh), believers, obedient to Allâh, turning to Allâh in repentance, worshipping Allâh sincerely, fasting or emigrants (for Allâh’s sake), previously married and virgins.

On  pages 88 & 89 of The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, we learn a little more about Hafsa and her slave, Moe and Zeinab.  Lechery?  Is it possible?

  • In his adventures with Zeineb, the wife of Zeid, and with Mary, an Egyptian captive, the amorous prophet forgot
  • the interest of his reputation. At the house of Zeid, his frcedman and adopted son, he beheld, in a loose undress, the beauty of Zeineb, and burst forth into an ejaculation of devotion and desire. The servile or grateful freedman
    understood the hint, and yielded, without hesitation, to the love of his benefactor. But, as the filial relation had excited some doubt and scandal, the angel Gabriel descended from heaven to ratify the deed, to annul the adoption, and gently to reprove the apostle for distrusting the indulgence of his God. One of his wives, Hafsa,174 the daughter of Omar, surprised him on her own bed in the embraces of his Egyptian captive; she promised secrecy and forgiveness; he swore that he would renounce the possession of Mary. Both parties forgot their engagements; and Gabriel again descended with a chapter of the Koran, to absolve him from his oath, and to exhort him freely to enjoy his captives and concubines without listening to the clamours of his wives. In a sohtary retreat of thirty days, he laboured, alone with Mary, to fulfil the commands of the angel. When his love and revenge were satiated, he summoned to his presence his eleven wives, reproached their disobedience and indiscretion, and threatened them with a sentence of divorce both in this world and in the next: a dreadful sentence, since those who had ascended the bed of the prophet were for ever excluded from the hope of a second marriage. Perhaps the incontinence of Mahomet may be palliated by the tradition of his natural or preternatural gifts :173 he united the manly virtue of thirty of the children of Adam; and the apostle might rival the thirteenth labour 176 of the Grecian Hercules.177

The marriage: Tabari Vol VIII, pg 134, tells us more about how Moe got Zayd’s wife and issued situational scripture to sanction the deal.

  • Then the Messenger of God married Zaynab bt. Jahsh b. Ri’ab b. Ya’mur b. Sabirah. 895 Previously, she was married to Zayd b. Harithah b. Sharabil, freedman of the Messenger of God, but she did not bear any children with him. (It was) about her that God[1773]

    revealed: “When you said to him whom God had blessed and you had favored, ‘Keep your wife to yourself and fear God,’ you concealed within yourself that which God was about to reveal. You feared other
    men, but it is more fitting that you should fear God.

    When Zayd had accomplished the necessary (formality of Divorce) from her, We gave her in marriage to you, so that there should not be any fault for the believers in respect to the wives of their adopted sons,
    after they have performed the necessary formality [of Divorce] from them. And God’s command must be fulfilled.”896 God married her to him and sent Gabriel concerning that matter. She used to boast to the other wives of the Prophet, saying, “I am the most honored among you because of the One who gave me in marriage and the one who was my intermediary  (i. e., Gabriel) (*akramukunna waliyy’an wa  kramukunna safir’an*).”897

  • 33:37.
    And (remember) when you said to him (Zaid bin Hârithah; the freed­ slave of the Prophet ) on whom Allâh has bestowed Grace (by guiding him to Islâm) and you (O Muhammad  too) have done favour (by manumitting him) “Keep your wife to yourself, and fear Allâh.” But you did hide in yourself (i.e. what Allâh has already made known to you that He will give her to you in marriage) that which Allâh will make manifest, you did fear the people (i.e., Muhammad  married the divorced wife of his manumitted slave) whereas Allâh had a better right that you should fear Him. So when Zaid had accomplished his desire from her (i.e. divorced her), We gave her to you in marriage, so that (in future) there may be no difficulty to the believers in respect of (the marriage of) the wives of their adopted sons when the latter have no desire to keep them (i.e. they have divorced them). And Allâh’s Command must be fulfilled.33:38. There is no blame on the Prophet () in that which Allâh has made legal for him.That has been Allâh’s Way with those who have passed away of (the Prophets of) old. And the Command of Allâh is a decree determined.
  • 33:39. Those who convey the Message of Allâh and fear Him, and fear none save Allâh. And Sufficient is Allâh as a Reckoner.
  • 33:40. Muhammad (PBUH) is not the father of any man among you, but he is the Messenger of Allâh and the last (end) of the Prophets. And Allâh is Ever All­Aware of everything.


Did God have as his last and best messenger an unrepentant murderer?  Moe commissioned hits on critics. He would
have my head for uttering and publishing this blog post which exposes the truth about Moe to public view.  You watched the dramatization of the murder of Um Qirfa, was that for real?  Turn to page 664 of Guillaume’s The Life of Muhammad to find out.

  • . Qays b. al-Musahl,1ar al- Ya’muri killed Mas’ada b.Hakamab. Malik b.Hudhayfa b. Badr, and Umm Qirfa Fatima d. Rabi’a b. Badr was taken prisoner.She was a very old woman, wife of Malik. Her daughter and  ‘Abdullah b. Mas’ada were also taken. Zayd  ordered Qays b. al-Musal,1l,1ar to kill Umm Qirfa and he killed her cruelly (T. by putting a rope to her two legs and to two camels and driving them until they rent her in two). Then they brought Umm Qirfa’s daughter and Mas’ada’s son to the apostle. The daughter of Umm Qirfa belonged to Salama b. ‘Amr b.

    al-Akwa’ who had taken her. She held a position of honour among her people, and the Arabs used to say, ‘Had you been more powerful than Umm Qirfa you could have done no more.’ Salama asked the apostle to let him have her and he gave her to him and he presented her to his uncle Hazn b. Abu Wahb and she bare him’ Abdu’I-Ral,1man b. Hazn.

The story of the murder of Kab Ashraf is told in Ishaq on page 367.

  • The apostle said-according to what’ Abdullah b. Abu Burda told me-‘Who will rid me of Ibnu’I-Ashraf?‘IMuhammad b. Maslama, brother of the B. ‘Abdu’I-Ashhal, said, ‘I will deal with him for you, O apostle of God, I will kill him.’ He said, ‘Do so if you can.’ So Muhammad b. Maslama returned and waited for three days without food or drink, apart from what was absolutely necessary. When the apostle was told of this he summoned him and asked him why he had given up eating and drinking. He replied that he had given hi.m an undertaking and he did not know whether he could fulfil it. The apostle said, ‘AIl that is incumbent upon you is that you should try.’ He said, ‘O apostle of God, we shall have to tell lies.’ He answered, ‘Say what you like, for 551 you are free in the matter.’

    Thereupon he and Silkan b. Salama b. Waqsh who was Abu Na’ila one of the B. ‘Abdu’I-Ashhal, foster-brother of Ka’b, and ‘Abbad b. Bishr b. Waqsh, and al-Harith b. Aus b. Mu’adh of the B. ‘Abdu’l-Ashhal and Abu’ Abs b. Jabr of the B.Haritha conspired together and sent Silkan to the enemy of God, Ka’b b. Ashraf, before they came to him. He talked to him some time and they recited poetry one to the other, for Silkan was fond of poetry. Then he said, ‘O Ibn Ashraf, I have come to you about a matter which I want to tell you of and wish you to keep secret.’

    ‘Very well,’ he replied. He went on, ‘The coming of this man is a great trial to us. It has provoked the hostility of the Arabs, and they are all in league against us. The roads have become impassable so that our families are in want and privation, and we and our families are in great distress.’

    Ka’b answered, ‘By God, I kept telling you, O Ibn Salama, that the things t warned you of would happen.’ Silkan said to him, ‘I want you to sell us food and we will give you a pledge of security and you deal generously in the matter.’ He replied, ‘Will you giv~ me your sons as a pledge?’ He said, YOU want to Insult us. I have fnends who share my opinion and I want to bring them to you so that you may sell to them and act generously and we will give you enough weapons for a good pledge.’ Silkan’s objection was that he should not take alarm at the sight of weapons when they brought them. Ka’b answered, ‘Weapons are a good pledge.’ Thereupon Silkan returned to his companions, told them what had happened and ordered them to take their arms. Then they went away and assembled with him and met the apostle…. Then after a space he did it for the third time, and cried, ‘Smite the enemy of God!’ So they smote him, and their swords

    clashed over him with no effect. Muhammad b. Maslama said, ‘I remembered my dagger when I saw that our swords were useless, and I seized it. Meanwhile the enemy of God had made such a noise that every fort
    around us was showing a light. I thrust it into the lower part of his body, then I bore down upon it until I reached his genitals, and the enemy of God fell to the ground. Al-Harith had been hurt, being wounded either in his head or in his foot, one of our swords having struck hitn. We went away, passing by the B. Umayya b. Zayd and then the B. Quray~a and then Bu’ath until we went up the lJarra of al-‘Urayg.1 Our friend al-Harith had lagged behind, weakened by loss of blood, so we waited for him for some time until he came up, following our tracks. We carried him and brought him to the apostle at the end of the night. We saluted him as he stood praying, and he came out to us, and we told him that we had killed God’s enemy. He spat upon our comrade’s wounds, and both he and we returned to our families. Our attack upon  God’s enemy cast terror among the Jews, and there was no Jew in Medina who did not fear for his life.’2

The Murder of Marwan’s daughter is detailed on page 997.

  • When the apostle heard what she had said he said, ‘Who will rid me of Marwan’s daughter?‘ ‘Umayr b. ‘Adiy al-Khatmi who was with him heard him, and that very night he went to her house and killed her. In the morning he came to the apostle and told him what he had done and he said, ‘You have helped God and His apostle, 0 ‘Umayr! When he asked if he  would have to bear any evil consequences the apostle said, ‘Two goats won’t butt their heads about her,’ so ‘Umayr went back to his people.

Torture & rape of captives

You saw a dramatization of the torture death of Kinana and seizure of his widow. What is the reality?  Did that
really happen?  For the answer, we turn to Tabari, Vol. VIII, page 122.

  • When Safiyyah became the bride of Kinanah b. al-Rabi’ b. AbiHuqayq, she dreamt that a moon had fallen into her lap. She told her vision to her husband, and he said, “That is only because you are wishing for the king of the Hijaz, Muhammad” – and he gave her face a slap that blackened her eye. She was brought to the Messenger of God with the traces of it still there; he asked her what it was, and she told him this story.According to Ibn Ishaq: Kinanah b. al-Rabi’ b. Ab al-Huqayq, who had the treasure of the Banu al-Nadir,508 was brought to the Messenger of God, who questioned him; but he denied knowing where it was. Then the Messenger of God was brought a Jew who said to him, “I have seen Kinanah walk around this ruin every morning.” The Messenger of God said to Kinanah: “What do you say? If we find it in your possession, I will kill you.”509 “All right,” he answered. The Messenger of God commanded that the ruin should be dug up, and some of the treasure was extracted from it. Then he asked him for the rest of it. Kinanah refused to surrender it; so the Messenger of God gave orders concerning him to al-Zubayr  b. al-‘Awwam, saying, “Torture him until you root out what he has.”
    Al-Zubayr kept twirling his fires tick in his breast 510 until Kinanah almost expired; then the Messenger of God gave him to Muhammad b. Maslamah, who beheaded him to avenge his brother Mahmud b.Maslamah.

Did Moe really seize the widow of the man he tortured and add her to his harem?

  •   Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 143

    Narrated Anas bin Malik:

    The Prophet said to Abu Talha,
    “Choose one of your boy servants to serve me in my expedition to Khaibar.” So, Abu Talha took me letting me ride behind him while I was a boy nearing the age of puberty. I used to serve Allah’s Apostle when he stopped to rest. I heard him saying repeatedly, “O Allah! I seek refuge with You from distress and sorrow, from helplessness and laziness, from miserliness and cowardice, from being heavily in debt and from being overcome by men.” Then we reached Khaibar; and when Allah enabled him to conquer the Fort (of Khaibar), the beauty of Safiya bint Huyai bin Akhtab was described to him. Her husband had been killed while she was a bride. So Allah’s Apostle selected
    her for himself and took her along with him till we reached a place called Sad-AsSahba,’ where her menses were over and he took her for his wife. Haris (a kind of dish) was served on a small
    leather sheet. Then Allah’s Apostle told me to call those who were around me. So, that was the marriage banquet of Allah’s Apostle and Safiya. Then we left for Medina. I saw Allah’s Apostle folding a cloak round the hump of the camel so as to make a wide space for Safiya (to sit on behind him) He sat beside his camel letting his knees for Safiya to put her feet on so as to mount the camel. Then, we proceeded till we approached Medina; he looked at Uhud (mountain) and said, “This is a mountain which loves us and is loved by us.” Then he looked at Medina and said, “O Allah! I make the area between its (i.e. Medina’s) two mountains a sanctuary as Abraham made Mecca a sanctuary. O Allah! Bless them (i.e. the people of Medina) in their Mudd and Sa (i.e. measures).”

Barbarian rapine

Go back and re-read 33:26 & 27 by clicking this link; use your Backspace key to return here.. Moe attacked the settlement, killed the men, raped the women and enslaved the children, seizing their property.  Allah facilitated it.  Was that a singularity?  Is jihad exclusively defensive?  Or is it a regular pattern, part of Moe’s mission?  Examine the evidence carefully before making a decision.

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:Narrated Anas bin Malik:Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’
    And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims
  • Hedaya Vol II, Book IX, Ch. 1 Pg. 141  PDF 154 Islamic law
    codified by the Hanifi school of fiqh.

    • Text
    •     The destruction of the sword  is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as
      appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are generally received this effect.
    • Marginal Note: Infidels may be attacked without provocation.


Moe dictated and dispatched extortion letters to intended victims. I include this one because it is extremely clear,
leaving nothing to the imagination.

  • In the name of ALLAH the compassionate, the MercifulFrom Muhammad, Prophet of AllahTo the People of Aqaba

    May peace be on you. I praise Allah who is one and except whom there is nobody else to be worshipped.

    I do not intend to wage war against you till you receive my written reason for it. It is better for you, either to accept Islam or agree to pay Jiziya and consent to remain obedient to Allah, His prophet and his messengers.
    My messengers deserve honour. Treat them with respect. Whatever pleases my messengers, will also please me.

    These people have been informed of the orders about Jiziya. If you desire that there should be peace and security in the world, obey Allah and His Prophet. Thereafter none in Arabia and Ajam (Iran) shall dare
    cast an evil eye on you. But the rights of Allah and His Prophet can at no time be waived.

    If you do not accept these terms and set them aside, I do not need your presents and gifts. In that case, I shall have to wage war (to establish peace and security). Its result would be that the big ones shall be killed in war and the commoners shall be taken prisoners.

    I assure you that I am a true Prophet of Allah. I believe in Allah, and His Books, and His Prophets and am of the faith that Maseeh (Messiah) son of Mariam (Mary), is a Prophet of Allah and His word.

    Hurmala (Raziallah AnhoA.) who brought to me 3 wasaq (about 6 quintals) of barley, recommended your case. Had it not been in compliance of the command of Allah and the good opinion of Hurmala for you, it would not have been necessary for me to correspond with you and instead of it, there would have been a
    war. If you will obey my messengers, you shall immediately have my support and the help and support of everyone who is attached to me.

    My messengers are Shuraih-beel, Obaiy, Hurmala and Hurais (Raziallah AnhoA.) and whatever decision they take in respect of you, shall be acceptable to me.

    Your people are under the protection and responsibility of Allah and His Prophet.

    Supply provisions to the Jews of Maqna, for their journey to their country.

    If you accept obedience, may peace be on you.’

    Seal: Allah’s Prophet Muhammad .


From page 289 of  Guillaume’s The Life of Muhammad:

  • They said that when the apostle heard about Abu Sufyancoming from Syria, he summoned the Muslims and said, ‘This is the Quraysh caravan containing their property. Go out to attack it, perhaps God will give it as a prey.’

On page 512 we find another example.

  • ‘Abdullah b. Abu Bakr told me that one of Aslam told him thatB. Sahm of Aslam came to the apostle and complained that they had fought and got nothing and found nothing with the apostle which he could give them. He said: ~O God, You know their condition and that they have no strength, and that I have nothing togive them, so conquer for them the wealthiest of the enemy’s forts with the richest food.’ The following day God conquered the fort of al-Sa’b b. Mu’adh which contained the richest food in Khaybar

You have been told, by bloggers that this is a “crappy” video; by the U.N., President, Secretary of State & Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff that it is a ‘disgusting” video.  Now you have seen the evidence of the veracity of the main themes of the video.  Retire to chambers, contemplate the evidence and render your verdict in a comment.

Real solutions to the inevitable economic implosion

April 22, 2015

From here:

economy tsunamiThis is the sixth installment of a series. Read the first installment, <a “nofollow”=”” href=”; target=”_blank”>“One last look at the real economy before it implodes,”  the second installment, <a “nofollow”=”” href=””>“<a “nofollow”=”” href=”; target=”_blank”>The steady derailment of the U.S. financial system,” the third installment, <a “nofollow”=”” href=”; target=”_blank”>“The magic of establishment economics,” the fourth, <a “nofollow”=”” href=”; target=”_blank”>“The U.S. is being made economically irrelevant,” and the fifth, <a “nofollow”=”” href=”; target=”_blank”>“The endgame has arrived.” 

All problems, all crises, have at least one solution, if not many solutions. There is no such thing as an unwinnable scenario. Some people may not be smart enough or courageous enough to see it, but the solution is always there, waiting to be discovered. The only fight that cannot be won is the fight in which the enemy makes all the rules and we foolishly abide by those rules. Life is not a game of chess, and a man can choose to be more than a pawn anytime he has the guts to do so.

In the past, I have likened the liberty movement to a rebellion against the game itself, a group of people willing to walk away from the chess board and make their own rules. I stand by that assertion. However, walking away is not enough by itself; we must also be willing to take actions that will destroy the game entirely.

In order to accomplish this task, any rebellion against corruption of power must be self-critical — more self-critical of its own weaknesses than opposing propagandists could ever be. Most of our problems as a society are being caused by a relatively small number of elitists, but we will never be able to undo these problems without understanding our weaknesses as much as the enemy’s weaknesses. In this final installment of my six-part series, I will talk about real solutions to the inevitable economic implosion in front of us, but I will also discuss the shortcomings of the liberty movement as an obstacle to any success.

As noted in the fifth installment of this series, segments of the liberty movement have fallen into a trap of biased assumption when it comes to their gullible embrace of the false East/West paradigm. I find it a little sad at times when I come across freedom activists who worship the footsteps of Henry Kissinger/International Monetary Fund puppet Vladimir Putin, or those who cheer for a globalist petri dish like China, all because they hate American imperialism so much they have decided to cheerlead for the “lesser of two evils.” There is no difference between those who buy into the false East/West paradigm and those who buy into the false left/right political paradigm. There is no “good guy” in the world of geopolitical maneuvering. East or West, it is all irrelevant because both sides serve the same international interests. Those who refuse to recognize this fact will be utterly incompetent in terms of presenting practical solutions because they will still be caught inside the elitist game.

Another issue within the liberty movement is an inability by some to consider where the endgame will actually lead. I know very well that there are 1,001 theories out there as to what the globalists actually want to achieve, which is why I look at the evidence at hand. The best evidence is to look at what the globalists say they plan to do, as they are apt to do in random fits of arrogance. It is important to understand that the elites often cannot help themselves and are desperate to boast of their activities before said activities are a forgone conclusion. Some analysts in recent history have presented undeniable admission by the elites, yet some activists still bicker about the enemy’s intent.

Whether it be the surprising words of insiders like Carroll Quigley, or the in-depth investigations of Antony Sutton, or the quotable quotes of frothing Fabian socialists, there is indeed a distinct strategy in play, namely the strategy of order out of chaos. And in terms of economics, there is a distinct goal, namely the integration of national currencies into a single global basket system (the special drawing rights, or SDR) controlled by the IMF and the Bank for International Settlements. I do not “believe” this is the goal; I know this is the goal because the elites have for decades openly admitted to it in articles like “Get Ready For The Phoenix” published by the Rothschild-owned The Economist in 1988, which stated that a global currency system will be established under the auspices of the SDR by 2018.

Further information on this plan can be found in my article <a “nofollow”=”” href=”; target=”_blank”>“The economic endgame explained.”

As I have shown with ample evidence throughout this series, the U.S. is on the verge of fiscal collapse, the dollar is already in the process of losing its world reserve status, the East is just as subservient to the reset plan as the West, and all of this is in preparation for an engineered disaster that will anesthetize the masses and prepare them for a shift toward total centralization.

Solutions require us to first grasp the fundamental nature of the greater threat. The cold, hard truth is that we as a movement for freedom are alone in the fight against globalization. There are no nation states to fall back on. There is no safe region on the planet to run away to. No white knight is coming to our rescue, and any embrace of the East will end only in co-option and defeat for liberty activists.

Believe it or not, though, I am still an optimist.

Knowing the scale of the threat gives clarity to our response. The movement stands alone, therefore, we must act without naively waiting for outside aid. We must take on an attitude of self-reliance.

The gravity of our situation also reveals to us what solutions actually have merit and those that present false hopes. I have seen numerous attempts at silver-bullet solutions in the movement over the past decade, from useless and intangible crypto-currencies to pyramid schemes designed to generate enough revenue to “sue” the Federal Reserve to blind armed marches on Washington planned by tactically retarded spokesman to even more national election drives wasting even more money and more energy on candidates that may mean well but have no chance at defusing the economic time bomb already ticking away.

If the solution presented seems too easy, then it is probably nonsense. If someone is trying to sell you on the idea that no sacrifice, no struggle and no pain will be required to defeat globalism, then they are probably a con man trying to take something from you, whether it be your money or your common sense. Throughout history, the only real solutions to real problems — economic, social or political — require much pain and sacrifice. To change the world for the better, to fight for the truth, you must be willing to take risks up to an including risking your life, otherwise failure is guaranteed.

I do not believe in silver-bullet solutions. I do not believe there is a path of “least resistance.” The following methods are not academic. They are not philosophical. They will not appeal to egghead libertarians obsessed with theory rather than practice. And they will not appeal to self-proclaimed pacifists terrified of consequence and public perception. These are difficult actions, and I expect only the bravest people will implement them.


If you want to undermine a concerted campaign of globalization, you must generate an opposing system. The opposite of tyranny is voluntarism. The opposite of collectivism is individualism. The opposite of globalism is localism.

Localism is economic organization based upon the methodology of self-reliance. While globalism forces people, cities, states and countries to become interdependent and unable to survive or prosper without each other, localism brings internal economic stability and removes dependency. If all communities were based on localism and independent fiscal strength, such redundancy would make widespread financial collapse a thing of the past.

While globalism is a top down model in which all decisions and power bottleneck at the peak of the pyramid, localism is a bottom up grass-roots initiative in which no one has power over the lives of others. But in order for localism to become a reality, these things must be accomplished.

Real preparedness

Self-reliance requires preparedness. There is no way around it. There is no such thing as crisis for those who are prepared. This means placing oneself in a position to provide the necessities of life so that one does not become a slave to need. Desperation often leads to moral relativism, and tyrants thrive on the moral weakness of a population. The more prepared an individual is, the more likely he is to fight back against despotism. The more prepared a community is, the less that community will feel inclined to request aid from those who might leverage such aid to oppress that community.

Preparedness can also include commodity investment by individuals and networks of individuals. While beans, bullets and Band-Aids are a priority, no one can deny the trend of foreign central banks stockpiling precious metals. And this stockpiling is clearly being done as a parallel measure to de-dollarization. Metals are useful during windows of time just before collapse and after rebuilding has begun. They are a back-up. They are not a solution by themselves.

Real production

Americans, in particular, will have to become producers again. And by production I mean useful items, useful skills and useful ideas, rather than frivolous attempts to sustain our avarice and empty materialism. Do you have the skills to produce food, clean water, shelter, warmth or energy? Are you able to invent or reimagine useful tools? Can you repair useful items? Do you have any experience with hard labor whatsoever? If you have answered in the negative to these questions, then you have a lot of work ahead of you to learn what you can in the time we have left. If you were to approach a group of people today and try to convince them of your value as a producer, what would you tell them? If you were thrust into an economic system in which barter was the primary means of wealth circulation, what would you trade that people would actually want?

This is not necessarily a call for Americans to revert back to 18th century living; it is a call for Americans to reclaim their heritage of entrepreneurship and adaptability. Globalism is merely feudal mercantilism wearing a modernized mask. It is globalism that is taking us back to the Dark Ages. And only localism can bring us into a future where technical achievement works for the common man rather than against him.

Real community

At this stage in our society, collectivism has nearly decimated all vestiges of true community. Today, people have no clue who their neighbors are and most of them do not want to know. They have little to no interaction with their surroundings beyond superficial consumerism, and they see every other person around them as a competitor rather than an ally. Their idea of the “greater good” is a mentally deranged one. For them, the state is the root source of safety and communal coherency rather than the citizenry, and their neighbors are not to be trusted.

Collectivism isolates people from each other to the point that their only means of feeling a connection with their fellow man is to do so through support of the establishment control grid. Participation in the totalitarian framework becomes a shallow replacement for participation in the world around us. By paying taxes, blindly supporting a war, giving to international charities and voting once every two to four years, we fool ourselves into believing we are a part of a “team” and that our civic duty has been fulfilled.

This terrible cycle can be broken, but it takes the effort of individuals going out and actively building relationships with others of like mind. The liberty movement in particular should be forming groups and associations all over the country — not just to complain about the condition of the nation, but to take tangible actions. Mutual aid and barter groups, neighborhood watches and community preparedness teams, business ventures and engineering projects are all useful means of organization. These organizations will not form themselves. You must make them happen.

Real self-defense

As I discussed in my article “If you are not thinking tactically you are not a survivalist,” self-defense is an imperative that simply cannot be denied. This defense must include preparation for all enemies, foreign and domestic, and corrupt government is not excluded.

Economic collapse is very often followed by an increase in oppressive state power. And in the end, the establishment does not relinquish power over the citizenry unless it is forced to do so. All honorable people should endeavor to become dangerous people, the more dangerous the better.

Voices expressing nihilism and futility are rarely constructive and should be ignored. Frankly, I find such cowardice stomach churning. There may very well come a day in which you will have to decide between freedom or absolute slavery. The size, strength and technological advancement of the enemy should have no bearing whatsoever on the choice to fight for freedom. Again, there is no problem without a solution if you have the courage to seek it. I hope that my joint project with Oath Keepers on how to build a working thermal evasion suit, due to be released in the next few weeks, will provide a good example as to why a technologically advanced tyranny is still vulnerable to a resourceful citizenry.

Real grass-roots expansion

There has always been a lot of talk within the liberty movement of “nullification.” But ultimately, the philosophy of nullification is useless unless it comes from a position of strength. Federal overreach will not stop simply because a state happens to pass a bill denying the establishment full access. In Montana, medical marijuana legalization was crushed by the Feds despite state recognition. They simply marched in and arrested on drug charges anyone who dared open up shop, and the state did nothing to stop it. This is just one example of many in which nullification failed because people refused to accept that written law is meaningless unless it is backed by a vigilant public.

I suspect that as the overall economic implosion becomes more obvious to average people, there will be some counties and states that develop a desire for nullification on a grand scale. Americans will want resource implementation to provide wealth protection. And some states have more than enough resources to offset a national financial disaster, or at least stop that disaster at their borders. This would require the complete dissolution of numerous federal laws prohibiting resource development.

Such dissolution will not be successful unless counties and states have enough strong grass-roots communities in place to defend against federal intrusion — or at least make the idea so costly and prohibitive that they have second thoughts. Each smaller liberty group linking with other liberty groups can eventually create this kind of expansion. This is, of course, a best-case scenario. County and state organization should take a backseat to neighborhood and town organization until wider expansion becomes realistic.

The collapse itself could easily be prolonged through a series of smaller catastrophes; or it could happen in a matter of days, depending on the trigger. For now, it appears that the U.S. is to be worn down to nothing as the IMF works closely with the BRICS to promote the SDR basket system. All nations will be negatively affected by this shift, but some will be hurt far more than others. War is certainly a possibility and would make for great cover as the IMF’s global reset is enacted. I can’t speak much to this kind of event other than to say that regardless of what happens, the IMF and the BIS will remain neutral, waiting until the conflicts subside so that they can step in as “heroes” ready to rebuild the world.

The liberty movement must also be ready to rebuild, and our ideal must be fully formed if we are to compete with the globalists. The most difficult reality of all is the reality that economic implosion is the end of one era and the beginning of a new battle. Our fight will not only be against the machinations of elitists, but also to convince the world that the way of independence and freedom is more useful and preferable than the way of collectivist peasantry. Collapse is already upon us; now we must decide who will determine what happens next.

–Brandon Smith


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 34 other followers