Archive for September, 2013

EDUCATIONAL FALLACIES: How the use of Critical-Thinking Logical Fallacies corrupted Education

September 30, 2013

I’ve noticed that the American educational system was hijacked by such as the irrational subjectivist (leftist) JOHN DEWEY, whose main thesis (as contested by his opponent, Lord Bertrand Russell,) was essentially that:

“Since there’s always a diverse multiplicity of causes and effects, we can never really know anything for sure, so, since all facts are really only opinions anyway, my subjective, fact-free opinions are the diversely opposite equals to your silly ‘facts!’ Whee!”

This nonsensical, irrationalist stance led immediately to the top-down, authoritarian promotion of the false notions that these education-salesmen’s child wards were entitled to an un-earned self-esteem “right” to not be “offended” by having their feelings hurt by the painful Truth; in other words, the “right” to remain wrong! And of course the lazy teachers all eagerly embraced this “Socratic method” of asking their kids: “Well, what do YOU think about it, Little Johnny and Janey? And remember: There are NO WRONG ANSWERS!” (Whee!) Saved them all the effort of ever actually having to teach anyone anything, didn’t it?



And this nannystate molly-coddling victimology-sales platform is why all the leftists are such infantile delinquents, and is why we must now endure so many contentious trolls avoiding the truth by using all the evasions, distractions and deflections known collectively as the critical-thinking logical fallacies (the distractive red-herring ad-hominem personal attacks, and of course the immoral relativist’s favorite, the argumentum tu-quoque) to shoot the messengers for daring to hurt their feelings by accusing them of their crimes of negligence!

Kids learn by observing their elders (monkey-see, monkey-do) and our us-versus-them, might-makes-right societal zeitgeist is based on the brazen rule of chaos and immorality which demands that everyone BUY (you) LOWest to SELL (me) as the most HIGH, to raise one’s Self above all others by tempting them to lower themselves, to sell victimology, & tell them what they want to hear.

The Advertising Salesmen who rule us all these days, always attack everyone else first, by advertising fear in order to sell us the ‘greedy’ hope of relief from their own initial threats of pain!

They endlessly demonstrate to our kids their own claims that only they have the right to be irresponsible, and only everyone else has the responsibility to be right (as in factually correct)!

Political Correctness IS Factual Incorrectness, & even small children can easily recognize fraud!

And so Leftists of all colours don’t think at all – they only react to fearing fear by wanting to form ever-larger groups to protect themselves from self-responsibility!

They lie to themselves, then to others, by pretending their new imaginings are old memories!
They thus always reverse cause and effect, to justify their image over reality preferences!

In fact, ALL infantile delinquent liberals pretend to imagine that:

“Since there’s always a diverse multiplicity of causes and effects for everything, not only are we all helpless victims before life’s complexities, but it’s also true that all facts are really only opinions anyway! So my subjective, fact-free opinion is the diversely opposite ‘equal to your silly objective facts! Whee! So, obviously we all need a bigger group to protect us from ourselves and from other dangerous groups! Only groups should have rights, and all merely fallible and so potentially dangerous individual human citizens should at most be assigned some temporary, revokable privileges! And furthermore, it’s only my right to be irresponsible, and only everyone else’s responsibility to be right (as in factually correct)! It’s my right to remain wrong, and to get you to pay for it! It’s my privileged liberal victimology entitlement dividend, and don’t you forget it, you hater racist bigots!”

Any further questions, suckers?


Yes, the problem is that liberals hate personal responsibility, so they avoid it by selling endless group-rights victimology scenarios instead. That way the cowards can pretend to be champions without risking the dangers of having to accuse any actual, individual criminals of their crimes!

And, (never having any facts which would ever agree with their perpetual, perverse irrationality,) the left must always resort to the slanderous evasions known collectively as the critical thinking logical fallacies (ad-hominems, red-herrings, and especially the immoral relativist’s favorite, the tu quoque – i.e: “islam isn’t evil because we all do it too! Whee!”).

Isn’t it funny that people who actually have facts, rarely (if ever) seem to feel the need to indulge in fallacies?

But hey, it’s deliberate criminal negligence: for, while no problem was ever solved by ignorintg it, their REAL MOTTO is simply: “THERE’S NO MONEY IN SOLUTIONS!” (Whee!) 

They only con everyone else into giving money to their group of self-promoting “crisis-relief management expert” SALESMEN! To those who always ignore the real, simple, permanent solutions to these temporary problems, in favor of exploiting the infinite symptoms of ignoring them into perpetually lucrative, “eternal crises” i.e: Please Give Generously – AGAIN!”



Karl Marx said: “Property IS theft!”

Which of course really only means:

“You owe me, because you earned stuff I didn’t bother to!”

Envy isn’t a real emotion – it’s only deliberately negligent, criminal slander.

“The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.”

~ Winston Churchill

It’s always easier to blame someone else for your lack of motivation, than it is to actually take some self-reliant responsibility for your self. After all, if you try, you might fail!

It’s also the reason whiny Marxist atheists and Emocrat victimologists hate the idea of a good “God” – because one of their main evasive excuses is predeterminism (exactly like islam) where they get to say: “Evil isn’t evil because we all do it too!” and: “There is no real crime, nor any real criminals, because we’re all just helpless victims! The allah made me do it!”


Our backwards “Education system” pretends to a right not to fail, not just a right to try to succeed! They want rights without responsibilities, and unearned, ‘communal’ ownership!

In doing so, the educationalists pretending to be teachers give this “right” to them selves, as well – by discouraging, depriving and stealing from their child charges and wards, their rights to learn for them selves from the (often painful) truth, these “educationalists” grant them selves the right to remain irresponsibly wrong, too! Literally: no pain, no gain – but they want only painless gains!

Because to be given the false right not to fail is the theft of our right to try to succeed, these poor kids are being turned into infantile delinquents – into negligent criminals who imagine it’s their right to remain irresponsibly, ingorantly wrong, in stead of enjoying the responsibility to become right!

If the educationalists (education-salesmen and women) can’t fail their kids, then they imagine they can’t fail at their jobs… but, in doing so, they have already failed: they only ever encourage rights without responsibility, the ‘right’ to become spoiled little infantile delinquents and slaves to a nannystate society, when in reality we all only have the right to be responsible, to not attack others first, and the only real responsibility we’ll ever have, is to be factually right – and so to not attack others first! The right to remain wrong is a lie, and lying is the most basic form of theft – it’s the theft of the Truth.

And theft IS crime.

All crimes are forms of theft: offensive attacks that deny the attacker’s victim something they, not the attacker, are entitled to; basic robbery is theft of one’s stuff (and so is arson); kidnapping, assault, and rape are all thefts of one’s bodily autonomy, murder is theft of one’s life, and lying (fraud) is the theft of the Truth. And lying includes presenting one’s merely subjective, unresearched, fact-free opinion as if it were objective fact; i.e: pre-judicial slander! So, of course encouraging others – especially helpless children – to commit same, is also a major crime!

Our feckless and fickle, sales-driven society promotes only selfish greed, not truly universal hope, by advertising fear. Greed is hope limited by fear. And greed is the false notion that one can have rights without responsibilities (to others, by attacking them first, by denying them their rights); this falsely oblivious selfishness is criminal negligence!

Evasive idolatry, too, is criminal negligence: evasively pretending to have rights without responsibilities! All the so-called critical-thinkng logical-fallacies are acts of criminal negligence!

So is slander: the false right to accuse others, without the responsibility of gathering facts!

In fact, all crime (thefts) are based on the excuse one has a right to take another’s property, without the responsibility to give them any consideration or compensation!

And negligent criminality can be either aggressive (“It’s my right to attack you, for your own good! This (guilty feeling) hurts me more than it does you! Whee!”) or passive (“It’s my right to not help you, even though I’ve agreed to be contracted to provide help!”) – &/or both. Irresponsibly delinquent parents, too, may assume “It’s my right to do things TO you, because I also (have contractually agreed to) do things FOR you!”

It’s all based on the divide-and-conquer notion that fear and greed (or hope) are diversely equal opposites, and, sub-sequently, that one can ignore fearfully onerous responsibilities to have some greedily-hoped for rights without them!

Democrat Paradise

September 26, 2013

Democrat Paradise

This is what ALL criminals want – for everyone else! Total control over them!

Are The Real Enemies In Syria Or Washington?

September 14, 2013

Reposted from here:

September 10, 2013 by

Are The Real Enemies In Syria Or Washington?


“Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment — that which they cannot anticipate.”–Sun Tzu, The Art of War

The definition of what makes an “enemy” may vary from person to person. But I would say that, generally, an enemy is one who has an active ability to do irreparable harm to you or your essential values. He is motivated by destruction, the destruction of all that you hold dear. He is capable and motivated. He is a legitimate threat. He will not compromise. He will not waver. He will do anything to wound you. He will not stop. He is possessed.

Americans have spent the better part of a century being told who their enemies are with very little explanation or substantiation. We have blindly rallied around our patriotic prerogative without knowing the root cause of the conflict or the nature of the target we are told to annihilate. We have been suckered into war after war, conjured by international interests in order to lure us into accepting greater centralization and concentrated globalism. As a culture, I’m sorry to say, we have been used. We are a tool of unmitigated doom. We are the loaded gun in the hand of the devil.

This paradigm has done terrible harm to our standing in the eyes of the peoples of the world. But until recently, it has done very little harm to us as a society. We have allowed ourselves to be used like a bloody club, but we have not yet felt the true pain or the true cost. We have been insulated from consequence. However, this exalted situation is quickly coming to an end.

When one applies the above definition of “the enemy” to Syria, one comes away with very little satisfaction. The Syrian government poses absolutely no immediate threat to the United States. In fact, the civil war that now rages within its borders has been completely fabricated by the American government. The insurgency has been funded, armed, trained and ultimately directed by the U.S. intelligence community. Without U.S. subversion, the civil war in Syria would not exist.

So, the question arises: If Syria is not the real enemy, who is?

I point back to the core issue. That is to say, I would examine who poses a legitimate threat to our country and our principles. The Syrian government under Bashar Assad clearly has no capability to threaten our freedom, our economic stability, our social stability or our defensive capabilities. There is, though, a group of people out there who do, in fact, pose a significant threat to the American way of life on every conceivable level. These people do not live on the other side of the world. They do not wear foreign garb or speak another language. They do not have pigmented skin or Asian features. They look just like you and I, and they live in Washington.

If the so-called “debate” over a possible military strike in Syria has done anything, it has certainly brought the American public’s true enemies to the surface. Men who posed as liberal proponents of peace now salivate over the prospect of bloodshed. Men who posed as fiscal conservatives now clamor for more Federal funding to drive the U.S. war machine. Men who claimed to represent the citizenry now ignore all calls for reason in the pursuit of global dominance.

I have warned of the considerable dangers of a war in Syria for years — long before most people knew or cared about the Assad regime. Being in this position has allowed me to view the escalating crisis with a considerable amount of objectivity. In the midst of so much chaos and confusion, if you know who stands to gain and who stands to lose, the progression of events becomes transparent, and the strategy of the true enemy emerges.

So what have I observed so far?

If you want to know who has malicious intent toward our Constitutional values, simply move your eyes away from the Mideast and focus on our own capital. The ill will toward liberty held by the leadership of the Democratic and Republican parties is obvious in the Congressional support of the banker bailouts, the Patriot Acts, the National Defense Authorization Act, the President’s domestic assassination directives, the hands-off approach to National Security Agency mass surveillance, etc. But even beyond these litmus tests, the Syrian debate has unveiled numerous enemies of the American people within our own government.

The catastrophe inherent in a Syrian strike is at least partially known to most of the public. We are fully aware that there will be blowback from any new strike in the Mideast, economically as well as internationally. So if the average American with little political experience understands the consequences of such an action, the average politician should be more than educated on the dangers. Any representative who blatantly ignores the calamity ahead is either very stupid or has an agenda.

I find it fascinating that politicians and bureaucrats from both sides of the aisle are now coming out of the woodwork to cheerlead alongside each other for war and the state.

For those who are predominantly obsessed with Barack Obama as the source of all our ills, I would gladly point out that Republican leader and House Speaker John Boehner has thrown his support behind a Syrian strike, even before the U.N. investigative report on Syrian chemical weapons use has been released.

In the meantime, self-proclaimed Republican stalwarts like John McCain (R-Ariz.) have argued that Obama’s “limited strike” response is “not enough.” This is the same man, by the way, who has been instrumental in the monetary and military support of al-Qaida in Syria.

Secretary of State John Kerry, who not long ago ran for President on the platform of being an anti-war Democrat, now regularly begs the American people to back further war based on the same dubious evidence for which he once criticized the George W. Bush Administration. In fact, Kerry has made it clear that even if Congress votes “no” against a strike, he believes Obama has the right to set one in motion anyway.

Senator Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.), the man who openly admits in mainstream interviews that he believes the President has the right to indefinitely detain or assassinate American citizens without trial or oversight, has loudly indicated his support for a war on Syria. His criticisms parallel McCain’s in that he believes the Obama Administration should have attacked without Congressional approval or should commit to an all-out military shift into the region. Graham consistently fear mongers in the mainstream media. He warns that without a hard, immediate strike against Syria, catastrophe will befall Israel, and chemical and nuclear weapons will rain on America.

All I have to say to Graham is, if chemical or nuclear weapons are used against the American people, it will be because the establishment allowed it to happen — just as it has allowed numerous attacks in the past to occur in order to facilitate pretext for a larger war (Gulf of Tonkin, anyone?).

For those out there in the movement who are hoping for reason and logic to prevail during the Congressional debate on the Syrian issue, I would suggest that they do not hold their breath. This vote was decided before Obama ever allowed it to go to the Hill. The vote has been cast. The debate is a sideshow designed to make the American people feel as if their system of government still functions as it should. Remember, no Congress in the history of the United States has ever refused the request of a President to make war.

The more than 150 Congressmen who demanded a vote on the Syrian crisis did so because they wanted to be included in the process, not because they necessarily opposed a war. That leaves nearly 300 representatives who had no problem whatsoever with Obama attacking Syria unilaterally without any checks or balances. The Senate panel that initiated the voting process on the strike plan passed the initiative 10-7. I have no doubt that Obama has the votes to confirm the use of force.

But let’s say Obama does not get his Congressional approval; his office has asserted on numerous occasions that he has the authority to trigger war regardless. A “no” vote in Washington means nothing today. The probable scenario, though, is the most common scenario. Congress will most likely authorize the “use of military force” without directly declaring war on the Assad regime. This is exactly what Congress did in the wake of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. There was no evidence of an al-Qaida support structure and no evidence of weapons of mass destruction, but war rolled forward nonetheless. Congress gave Bush a blank check to do whatever he saw fit, and I believe this is what it will do for Obama.

America is being set up to look like the bad guy or the fool. Our political leadership is devoted to the ideology of globalization, not sovereignty or U.S prosperity. A Syrian strike places the United States in tremendous peril, the likes of which have not been seen since the Cuban missile crisis. Syria itself is a vacuum of death, a black hole swirling in a void of economic and sociological interdependency. Where the United States enters, so follows Iran, so follows Israel, so follows Saudi Arabia, so follows Lebanon, so follows Jordan, so follows Egypt, so follows Russia, so follows China and on and on.

In my analysis of Syria over the years, I have exposed the domino effect of war as well as the calamities of economic chain reaction. Escalating war in Syria will eventually lead to the end of the dollar’s world reserve status and the collapse of the U.S. financial system. Knowing that this is the ultimate result of a strike in the region, many people would ask why the White House and so many prominent figures in Congress would be so hell-bent on setting the wheels in motion. I would stand back from the chaos and ask what I always ask: Who gains the most from the disaster?

The demise of American currency dominance and the degradation of the American spirit do indeed benefit a select few. For the most part, central banks and globalists have taken a hands-off approach to the Syrian debacle. Perhaps that’s because doing so makes it easier for them to survey the inevitable collapse from a distance and swoop in later as our “saviors,” ready to rebuild the globe according to their own ideals. Having a debased and desperate U.S. populace certainly makes the transition to total globalization and centralization much easier.

My original query was: Who is the real enemy? No matter what happens in the coming months and years, never forget that question. Who poses the greatest threat to our freedom: Syria or the political ghouls trying to convince us to decimate Syria?

Who claims the power to take everything we have? Who claims the power to take our liberty and our lives at a whim? Who claims the power to kill innocents in our name? Who disregards the checks and balances of constitutionalism at every turn? Who truly threatens our future and the future of our children?

Do not be distracted by stories of foreign monsters so far away when the real monsters lurk so quietly under your bed. If we can find a way to pressure Congress into avoiding a Syrian conflict, remain vigilant. America is one global hiccup away from oblivion. And if this is what the establishment wants, they will find a way to make it happen. The threat of U.S. catastrophe will end only when the poison is removed from our very veins, and that process of purification begins with the removal of the criminal political structures and banking structures in Washington.

–Brandon Smith

Syrian Children Kidnapped By Rebels Identified As Gas Victims By Obama Administration

September 13, 2013

Re-posted, from here:

By Susan Duclos

The horrifying pictures of dead children being used by the Obama administration to justify an attack on Syria, with the claim that the Assad regime carried out the chemical attacks that killed those children, while emotionally heartbreaking, do not tell the story of those children and do not tell you the main point the Obama administration is trying to coverup.

Those children were kidnapped over a week earlier, before they were slaughtered……. by the Obama backed Syrian rebels.

August 11, 2013 a report discussed the rebels attacking the Latakia village and Sheikh Mohammed Reda Hatem, an Alawite religious leader in Latakia said  ”Until now 150 Alawites from the villages have been kidnapped. There are women and children among them. We have lost all contact with them.”

According to Voltairenet some of those children were found less than two weeks later, in Ghouta , photos below:

The wide distribution of satellite channel images of victims allowed Alawite families near Latakia to recognize their children who had been abducted two weeks prior by the “rebels.” This identification was long in coming because there are few survivors of the massacre by the allies of the United States, the United Kingdom and France in loyalist villages where more than a thousand bodies of civilians were discovered in mass graves.

The children do not correspond to a sample of the population: they are all almost of the same age and have light hair. They are not accompanied by their grieving families.

They are in fact children who were abducted by jihadists two weeks before in Alawite villages in the surroundings of Latakia, 200km away from Ghouta.

Barack Obama’s narrative is unraveling as the truth of who murdered these children is being exposed.

The Obama backed Syrian rebels are slaughtering these children, pretending it was Assad that did it, so Obama can claim justification in attacking the Assad regime.

See the video proof here:

Susan Duclos owns/writes Wake up America Blog


The U.S. backed FSA rebels-Al Qaeda, fighting in Syria, that U.S. forces have armed and trained are specifically targeting Christians. Under the Assad regime, Christians were protected.

The Degradation of Christian Women under Islam

Muslim Persecution of Christians: June, 2013
by Raymond Ibrahim September 11, 2013

In Egypt, U.S. ambassador Anne Patterson was urging Christian Copts not to protest Muslim Brotherhood rule, even though they would suffer under it most. Al Azhar, the world’s oldest Islamic university, called on the new Catholic Pope, Francis I, to declare that Islam is a religion of peace.

The degradation of Christian women living in the Islamic world continued in the month of June. In Syria, after the al-Qaeda linked rebel group conquered Qusair, a city of the governate of Homs, 15-year-old Mariam was kidnapped, repeatedly gang raped according to a fatwa legitimizing the rape of non-Sunni women by any Muslim waging jihad against Syria’s government, and then executed.

According to Agenzia Fides, “The commander of the battalion ‘Jabhat al-Nusra’ in Qusair took Mariam, married and raped her. Then he repudiated her. The next day the young woman was forced to marry another Islamic militant. He also raped her and then repudiated her. The same trend was repeated for 15 days, and Mariam was raped by 15 different men. This psychologically destabilized her and made her insane. Mariam became mentally unstable and was eventually killed.”

In Pakistan, Muslim men stormed the home of three Christian women, beat them, stripped them naked and tortured them, and then paraded them in the nude in a village in the Kasur district. Days earlier, it seems the goats of the Christian family had accidentally trespassed onto Muslim land; Muslims sought to make an example of the Christian family, who, as third-class citizens, must know their place at all times.

The rest of June’s roundup of Muslim persecution of Christians around the world includes (but is not limited to) the following accounts, listed by theme and country in alphabetical order, not according to severity:

Attacks on Christian Worship: Churches and Monasteries

Britain’s rulers have heavily colonized Britain with Muslims from many Muslim countries. Most Muslims in the UK are from Pakistan. Many thousands of Britain’s children have been gang-raped; tortured; forced into prostitution and sexually ENSLAVED by dirty, criminal Muslim MONSTERS. Join Paul Weston’s Liberty GB. Britain’s last great hope!

Read Paul Weston’s fantastic article: Why Is This Not Treason?


September 6, 2013

How can it be a Syrian civil war, when most of the so-called rebels aren’t even Syrians?!


IT’S OBAMA’S CRIME, NOT ASSAD’S! It’s criminal that Obama deliberately imports tons of violent foreign (Saudi, Libyan, Chechnyan, Iraqi, etc) jihadis into Syria, to overthrow, by covert and undeclared war, a sovereign national government which is a member of the UN, and then has the gall to say that government is committing crimes in defending itself from his gang of imported criminals, by gassing “it’s own” people!

It’s especially galling when one considers the gas attacks are also just another ploy of Obama’s to distract everyone from his domestic crimes, by scaring them with the threat of WWIII!

This seems to be proof the Obama White House deliberately falsified the Israeli intelligence reports on the Syrian gas attacks:

…And this seems to implicate Saudomite Prince Bandar “Bush” Bin Sultan in it all, too:

The Gates of Vienna Are Wide Open – Conquest By Other Means

September 5, 2013

Reposted from here:

September 4, 2013
By Don Feder

Besides the anniversary of the 2001 World Trade Center attack and the murders of four Americans in Benghazi last year, September 11 also marks the 330th anniversary of the beginning of the battle of Vienna in 1683, which stopped the Islamic advance in Europe – temporarily.

But where Ottoman armies failed, Muslim immigration, homegrown terrorism, demographic jihad and multiculturalism are succeeding.

The combined forces of the Holy Roman Empire and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth – under the command of the Polish King Jan III Sobieski – lifted the Ottoman siege begun two months earlier.

The battle marked the turning point in the 300-year struggle between Christendom and the Ottoman Empire – itself an extension of a European war that started almost a thousand years earlier, with the Umayyad conquest of Spain in the 8th century..


       Within a few decades of the battle, the Ottomans had lost most of their European domains. Viennese bakers celebrated their deliverance with what came to be called the croissant, a pastry in the shape of the Muslim crescent. Take a bite out of Islam?

Today, sans uniforms or siege engines, Islam’s armies are on the march across Europe.

On May 22, in the London neighborhood of Woolich, two Muslims hacked to death and tried to behead British soldier Lee Rigby. The killers made no attempt to escape. Waving a bloody machete, one shouted at bystanders: “We must fight them as they fight us…. You people (Brits) will never be safe.”

Prime Minister David Cameron resolutely declared, “We will never give in to terror or terrorism.” Cameron added that the murder wasn’t just an attack on the British way of life, but “a betrayal of Islam.”

“There is nothing in Islam that justifies this truly dreadful act,” Cameron intoned – no doubt based on his extensive knowledge on the Koran and Hadith, after a lifetime of study. Rumor has it he’s memorized most of the Suras in Arabic.

At a procedural hearing, accused Michael Adebolajo (who missed the memo on the incompatibility of terrorism and Islam) kissed a copy of the Koran and asked the judge to address him as “mujahid” – Arabic for “fighter” or “warrior.”

Private Rigby is another casualty in a global conflict – where one side wields machetes and plants bombs, while the other mouths inane clichés.

On Armistice Day in 2010, while Englishmen were laying wreaths at monuments to their war dead, Muslim protestors in London waved signs that said “British soldiers burn in hell” (for fighting the civilizing influence of the Taliban in Afghanistan) and “Allah is our protector. And you have no protector.” The British police blame such incidents on the English Defense League, for making Muslims feel bad about themselves by pointing out the obvious connection between the religion-of-bloody-machetes and acts of barbarism.

In “The Story of the Malakand Field Force,” Winston Churchill, who experienced the business end of Islam in Afghanistan’s borderlands and the Sudan, wrote that, unlike Christianity: “The Mahommedan religion increases, instead of lessening, the fury of intolerance. It was originally propagated by the sword, and ever since, its votaries have been subject, above the people of all other creeds, to this form of madness.”

The man who faced another totalitarian threat half-a-century later referred to Islam as “the religion of blood and war.” In Cameron’s Britain, Churchill would be hauled before a human rights tribunal and charged with inciting religious hatred.

In the U.K. and Western Europe, tolerance is a one-way street.

During the 2010 Christmas season, a group called Islam4UK plastered London with posters blaming the holiday for sexually-transmitted disease, rape, abortion and teen pregnancies. The posters disclosed: “In Islam we are protected from all of these evils. We have marriage, family, honor, dignity, security, rights for man, woman and child” – also honor killings, clitorectomies and the gang-rape of infidel women, prevalent throughout Scandinavia.

Sweden now has the second highest number of rapes in the world. Roughly 85% of the perpetrators are foreign-born, coming from such bastions of human rights as North Africa, the Middle East and South Asia.

Regarding the anti-Christmas posters, Sister Christine Frost, founding member of an East London charity, observed: “If we said such things about Muslims, we’d all be hanging from lamp-posts.”

When a constituent told her that a Dutch-Turkish politician was quoted in a local newspaper remarking, “We reject freedom of speech because we reject democracy” and “What you need is a heavy bomb attack,” Rotterdam City Councilor Bouchra Ismaili sputtered: “Listen well, you crazy freak. We are here to stay! You are the foreigners here!! With Allah on my side, I fear no one. Let me give you some advice: Convert to Islam and find peace at heart!” In Egypt, Muslims find serenity by burning Coptic churches.

Across the continent, as Muslim populations rise, the clash between savagery and civilization intensifies.

The French government has identified 751 no-go zones – euphemistically labeled “Sensitive Urban Zones” – neighborhoods where the state has de facto ceded authority to radical clerics and street gangs. In a newspaper interview, Germany’s Chief Police Commissioner Bernhard Witthaut confirmed: “Every police commissioner and interior minister will deny it. But of course we know where we can go with a police car and where, even initially, only with the (armored) personnel carrier.”

More than three centuries after the gates of Vienna held, Europeans have abandoned Christianity, lost control of major portions of their cities and achieved a fertility rate of 1.5 for the EU as a whole (70% below replacement), while European Muslims are busy having children, building mosques and asserting their sovereignty.

Cameron’s contribution to sagging British fertility was pushing same-sex “marriage” through Parliament this year.

In a 2005 report by the Swedish-based World Values Survey, 55% of Brits and 60% of French said they “never” or “almost never” attend church services. In continental Europe, churches have become the haunts of elderly women. Of London’s Muslim population, 88% say religion is an important part of their daily lives, as do 68% of Muslims in Paris, versus 36% of British and 23% of the French in those cities.

The war for Europe’s future is being lost in the bedroom. In 2010, the U.K Daily Mail reported that Mohammed (various spellings) was the most popular name for baby boys in the Britain and Wales. In 1900, Muslims accounted for 12.3% of the world’s population. In 2011, it was 23.4% and growing. Britain’s fertility rate is 1.91; 1.93 in the U.S. In Iraq it’s 4.3 and 7.1 in Afghanistan. Make love and jihad?

Germany now has more Muslims than Lebanon. Muslims are 25% of the population of Marseilles and Rotterdam, 20% in the Swedish city of Malmo, 15% in Brussels and Birmingham and 10% in London, Paris and Copenhagen. By 2020, every third child born in Europe will be a Muslim.

An absolute majority isn’t necessary to shape a country’s destiny. Supported by pandering politicians and a compliant media (following Rigby’s murder, Britain’s Channel 4 announced that it would broadcast the Muslim call to prayer throughout the month of Ramadan), dedicated minorities can wield disproportionate influence.

While Europe is flooded by Muslim immigrants, another minority is fleeing the continent that was its home for two millennia. The chief rabbi of the Netherlands warns, “The future for Dutch Jewry is moving to Israel.” With 60,000 Muslims, Malmo (Sweden’s third largest city) is hell for its remaining 700 Jews, whose synagogue and kindergarten resemble fortresses.

In Toulouse last year, another betrayer of Islam shot and killed four Jews in an attack at a day school, including an eight-year-old girl. In a recent poll, 38% of Muslim youth in Austria agreed that “Hitler had done a lot of good for the people.” Apparently, a sizeable minority of young religion-of-peaceniks believe something in Islam justifies the Holocaust. Strange.

Americans shouldn’t be too smug – European decadence and all that stuff.

Five weeks before Private Rigby was butchered on a London street, Chechen refugees Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev planted two pressure-cooker bombs (loaded with ball bearings and other shrapnel) near the finish line of the Boston Marathon – killing three, including an eight-year-old boy, and wounding 264. More than two dozen lost limbs.

The Fort Hood shootings (2009) and Boston Marathon bombings (2013) are bookends around Obama’s sacrifice of public safety to the gods of political correctness. On August 28, Army psychiatrist Major Nidal Hasan was sentenced to death for the shooting spree that left 13 dead.

Hasan, who had business cards made proclaiming himself a “Soldier of Allah,” and shouted “Allahu Akabar” as he pumped round after round into his comrades, took complete responsibility for the massacre, telling a military court: “The evidence will clearly show that I am the shooter.”

Besides blaming the U.S. for the deaths of innocent terrorists in Afghanistan, Hasan was also outraged by our refusal to accept “the law of Allah (Sharia) to be the supreme law of the land.”

The administration continues to classify Hasan’s rampage “workplace violence.” Following the shootings, then Army Chief of Staff General George W, Casey, Jr. said that as bad as the deaths of 13 soldiers in his command were, “It would be an even greater tragedy if our diversity becomes a casualty.” Diversity, multiculturalism and sensitivity are white flags the West waves at Islam. Their message is received loud and clear.

Before the atrocities, both Hasan and the Tsarnaev brothers were individuals known to the authorities.

But wrapped tightly in a straight-jacket of political correctness, the FBI didn’t act until after the fact. In 2012, after Director Robert Mueller met with representatives of the Muslim community/Brotherhood, the FBI purged 876 pages from it training manuals that characterized Muslims as prone to religious violence. In Boston, the Bureau was too busy doing outreach to the extremist mosque the Tsarnaev boys attended to pay attention to Russian intelligence warnings about the brothers’ radicalization.

What Islam couldn’t win by force of arms 330 years ago, it’s achieving through immigration (the Muslim world is exporting its surplus population where it will do the most damage), demographic jihad, complicity of the elite, intimidation and cynical pleas for tolerance.

To paraphrase Simon and Garfunkel: “Where have you gone Jan Sobieski? A continent turns its lonely eyes to you (woo, woo, woo).”



Don Feder is a former Boston Herald writer who is now a political/communications consultant. He also maintains his own website,

8230 Catbird Circle 302
Lorton VA 22079
888-239-9306 FAX


Are ALL Religions REALLY “the Same!”?

September 4, 2013

Let’s start with Catholicism versus islam, then compare Judaism and islam to, you know, see if all those leftist claims of “Those evil Abrahamic monotheisms are all the same!” are really true:

The Catholics have engaged in several (defensively “just”) holy wars, collectively called “The Crusades,” themselves – but in each and every case, islam started those wars by violently invading and enslaving all the formerly Greek, Christian and Jewish countries in the Middle East (like Egypt, Syria, Libya, Iraq and Turkey – not to mention India and Iran, too).

Popes aren’t religious people, they’re only “religions” salesmen, and that usually always only means: “Have Faith, for Hope IS a plan!” (“and Please Give Generously – AGAIN!”)

Islam sells the opposite: Hope is no plan at all, so always Submit to the fear of Pain!

Neither is any good for humanity, but the first creed is less evil than the latter one.

The god the moslems fear (not admire, love, nor really worship; but only obey) is similar to the old testament one, which was basically Pain incarnate, but which was replaced by the Christian one (the hope of no pain).

Christianity is infinitely better than islam (or, to put it another way, islam is LITERALLY infinitely worse than either Judaism or the Christianity that evolved from it, via the Jew named Jesus) and here’s exactly how and why:

The OT – even in its worst, homophobic, kill-your-children-if-they-don’t-worship-Yahweh, etc and genocidal bits, was only BY THE JEWS AND FOR THE JEWS!

Even those (7+2) tribal genocides were arguably defensive in nature, as the Jews, having escaped Egyptian slavery, were only en route back to their historical place of origin and homeland in Canaan, when their old neighbours decided to block their return. So they were told to kill THESE specific tribes, ONCE, and HERE (in the environs immediately surrounding the land of Israel). They were and still are only descriptive histories, not prescriptive commands.

Contrast that with the Koran, where Muhammad had all those old, BAD, genocidal bits read to him, declared them to be GOOD things, and then extrapolated them from being merely temporary, situational historical references and descriptions, into ETERNAL and GLOBAL prescriptions and “commands of god” to apply EVERYWHERE and FOR ALL TIME, and to EVERYONE else, too!

So the (literally infinite) difference is: ONCE, HERE, for us, contrasted with ALWAYS, EVERYWHERE, for everyone else, too!

Now, having clarified that, I can indeed agree about the claims of religion in general, and can also easily contrast them with those of philosophy and science, too:

Philosophy – is speculation, presented AS speculation.
Science – is tested speculation, presented AS tested speculation.
Religion – is speculation, presented AS FACT.

So, obviously, only one of these (religion) is a LIE – and lying is only the most basic form of theft (it’s the theft of the Truth) and all forms of theft ARE crime. All religions are crimes.

However, (that being said) at best, religion is the opinion of the religion-salesman, presented as fact, and sold as helpful advice: do what god advises, or bad things will happen, not because god is (or the gods are) out to get you, but because you ignored their laws (like gravity). And, at WORST, all “real” religions only say:

“Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods’) will get you!”


“Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

Thus proving the moslems have absolutely NO faith nor belief in their god’s own desires or abilities to enforce his own, us-versus-them and might-makes-right “laws.”

So all moslems are really only atheists, and “worse:” While the OT saw god as a big bad scary unknown (basically, they were told to fear god AS Pain) the New Testament reversed this, to seeing god as hope (of no pain). In fact, even in the OT, there were intimations of this evolution from fear to hope, as the “God IS Love!” bit was actually said first by MOSES, and Isaiah said that god “ONLY WANTS US TO REASON WITH HIM.”

The Koran, however, said “NO! That’s not right! God is still only a big, bad, scary unknown thing, (i.e: Pain incarnate) and so is always only to be feared, not loved!

God (“allah”) doesn’t need you, and he doesn’t love you, either! In fact, he’s the one who blinds you to his own truth, and throws you into eternal Hell for it, too!

So basically, islam is all stick, no carrot. On his own deathbed, Muhammad was asked what he thought would happen to him in the afterlife, and his reply was: “I have absolutely no idea.”

I think most of the smarter moslems say to themselves:

“I know I worship nothing – but it’s MY Nothing!”

Islam is empty of all hope, and only demands we all fear pain (which is natural to everything anyway) – it’s nothing more than idolatry, and an excuse to evade the pains of personal self-responsibility and thinking for one’s self. And that’s why it’s so hard to destroy and why it seems to be “winning” – because it gives it’s moslem mind-slaves the right to remain irresponsibly wrong, and to slanderously commit all crimes in god’s name. It might as well be (“Who dares, wins!”) Satanislam:

The ‘theological’ notion of Allah’s “oneness” is CRUCIAL to their main criminal, might-makes-right alibi, that “we aren’t responsible, and no one is every really a criminal anyway, because we’re all really only Allah‘s slaves and victims;” i.e:

“The Allah Made Me Do It!”
“In fact, I didn’t do it at all – ONLY The ALLAH did it! Whee!”

[8.17] So you did not slay them, but it was Allah Who slew them, and you did not smite when you smote (the enemy), but it was Allah Who smote, and that He might confer upon the believers a good gift from Himself; surely Allah is All-Hearing, Knowing.

Sura 4:77: “Those who whined “Hold back your hands (from attacking)” were corrected:
“War is compulsory for us – the good and bad both come from allah!”

“Fight them; Allah will punish them by your hands and will disgrace them and give you victory over them” – 9:14-15


Basically, islam denies there is a god at all, because Islamic “beliefs” include the belief that their god cannot be understood nor reasoned with, (so it might as well not exist at all) it can only feared and obeyed.

But when your “god” is simply and *generally* “everything,” then it’s also simply *specifically* “nothing” (existentialism IS nihilism)!

If your “god” is so remote that it doesn’t respond to you, then it might as well not exist at all (so it’s not really a “god” at all)!

It’s not really Ha-Shem, but more like Shiite-Happens.

Islamic beliefs also include the criminal notion that, since Muhammad got away with committing his crimes, (and he tried them all, enthusiastically, many times and, far from ever feeling remorse or apologizing for them, instead encouraged everyone else to join him in committing them, too) then “god” must have wanted him to get away with committing those crimes!

Sura 48:20: “Allah has promised you abundant spoils that you will capture, and He has hastened for you this, and He has restrained the hands of men from (defending themselves) from you, that it may be a sign for the believers, and that He may guide you to a Straight Path.”


“…and that He may guide you to a VERY Crooked Path INDEED!

Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – [fight] until they pay the jizya willingly while they are humbled.” – 9:29

So obviously islam is only an ancient yet ongoing extortion-racket CRIME syndicate, and the only “religious” part in it, is where they say:

“God told us to commit these crimes!”



Christianity holds the exact opposite: that, even if God is too complex for us to understand, that still doesn’t stop God from being able to understand us, and to relate to us, and communicate with us, on our own terms, in the person of Jesus Christ. And Jesus, the Jew, advised us to help each other, not to prey on one another.

Moslems and other backwards, adversarial satanic fear-salesmen say: “pain or be pained!” because they fear that fear causes pain. Christians know this world is one of pain and be pained, so fear (the memory of pain, projected to the future) is only the first step in the thought process: to correct our mistakes and avoid future sins, to get to the hope of no pain, one must first face one’s fears of pain, not ignore them or project them onto innocent others.

Greed (limited, selfish hope) is not the opposite of the fear of pain – fear and greed are the exact same thing! Moslems fear fear and so have no hope; they only worship their own fears of pain, and avoid thinking about them (more fear) by projecting the relief of them onto others.

Muhammad commands everyone to “Submit to the inevitability of Might-Makes-Right!” while Christ advises and demonstrates to all that, not matter how bad it gets, they should not Submit to becoming a part of the problem by downloading their unjustly-victimized pains onto others, too.

PS: “Revealed religion” has NOT been responsible for more deaths than any other; because atheistic communism hold that “winning” tally – after islam, of course – but then, islam is tribal us-versus them and group-might-makes-rights extortionist conformity, i.e: CRIME, exactly the same as communazism!


If any non-moslem is to believably assert in indulgence of their historical lies, that he or she agrees with the moslems’ claims that islam is a “religion,” (at all, much less one “of peace,”) then they must also supply valid reasons as to why they have chosen to believe in Muhammad’s most basic claims, that “God” has ordered him to order his followers to kill everyone not a member of his gang (like, for instance, the non-moslem now found to be endorsing his lies)!

i.e: If islam is such a valid religion, why does God order you to be murdered by it’s moslem members?

Do you really think that’s a valid way for one of God’s religions to behave?!

Besides being a liberal, what do you think you have done to deserve the moslem god’s eternal scorn and hatred?

Or, more generally,

“Do you believe that islam is NOT a danger to non-moslems?” (and, if so: WHY not?)!

As my American friend Dajjal recently put it:

Objectors declare that Islam is a religion, an equally valid pathway to God.

They pray and they sway so it must be ok.
(Me, I’d have said bray and spray, Dajjal)!

Was any legitimate religion founded for the personal emolument of its founder?

Does the deity of any legitimate religion sanctify and reward acts of terrorism?

Does the founder of any legitimate religion brag about winning wars by terrorism?

3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220. 2

Does the deity of any legitimate religion demand genocide as the price of admitting its founder to Paradise?

Is Islam a legitimate religion entitled to the umbra of protection afforded by the First Amendment’s free exercise clause?

Here’s the predictably obvious differences between raising tabula-rasa human children in an indoctrinating culture of  “THOU SHALT KILL!” as opposed to one of “THOU SHALT NOT KILL!”

Holy mobster Moslems only hate “infidels” because the Qur’an says “god” orders them to – Period.

Islam is a threat to everyone because IT says it is.

ALL moslems are criminals because, by their own rules, they must endorse in public every word in the Qur’an.

And the Qur’an tells them that they are so “superior” to all non-moslem humans, that it’s not only their right, but also their holy duty to their god, to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-moslems in the world, simply for the “crime” of not being moslems.

So the Qur’an is a clearly-written, us-versus-them hate-crime book, endorsing a permanent might-makes-right death-threat.

And all threats are psychological attacks (aka: coercion, duress, extortion, “terrorism”) and all non-defensive attacks are already classified as crimes.

After all, when you attack the Others first, then, by definition, you are the predatory criminal aggressor, and they are your innocent victims – there’s no two ways about it!

(Attacking second, or counter-attacking, in defense of one’s self and/or of innocent others, is always OK, and in fact such retaliation is the most basic and crucial, mandatory requirement for having any sort of deterring justice in the world at all, ever)!

In fact, one doesn’t need a god to agree to the basic principle embodied in the Golden Rule of Law which simply defines all sitational morality as:
Do Not Attack First.

Attacking second (Retaliatory counter-attacking to deter evil) is mandatory for justice.

And Threats (intimidation; coercion; duress; extortion; terrorism) are attacks.

We only have on real right – to not be attacked first – and one real responsibility – to not attack innocent others first. And that’s it; the entire social contract of Civilization.

In reality, it’s all about human reason and an ongoing, dynamic agreement to become situationally right (as in factually correct) as opposed to whining that one should be entitled to the static, idolatrous and victim-blaming right to remain irresponsibly wrong:

We in the West self-reliantly CHOOSE to agree to the Golden Rule of Law, which, by simply defining all situational morality as: “Do Not Attack First!” enables trust, progress, and Civilization.

(See all “Western” countries)!

Even the “Ten” Commandments are really only a bunch of listed symptoms, illustrating this simple binary; the first five are all cautions to “Fear and Obey!” while the second five are all admonishments not to steal! Thus, they, too, can be summed up as “Greed NOT; Be Fearful!” (or, as The Golden Rule of Law which defines all situational morality as: Don’t Attack First)!

But they in the East force everyone to obey the brazen rule of chaos, which embodies immorality as: “Our god says we always have to attack all ‘The Others’ first!” and so inflicts distrust, stagnation, and Barbarism.

(See all ‘moslem’ countries)!

So anyone who engages in the puerile, critical thinking logical fallacy of the Argumentum Tu Quoque, by falsely and slanderously asserting that “All Religions Are The Same!”

… is really only a coward who already knows, fears, and so Submits to islamic extortion; i.e:


…as if merely by listing and comparing two or more incidental cases of wrongs, would somehow magically turn one of them into a right!



Let’s compare the other great monotheism (albeit not acknowledged as an ‘Abrahamic’ one, despite the no-doubt Hindu origins of same; A-Brahman and his wife, Saraswati /Abraham and Sarai, etc), Buddhism, vis-a-vis both Christianity and islam:

Like Christianity and unlike islam, Buddhism condemns violence, but there it’s quite a simple case of:

“Life sucks, so ignore it and you’ll go away!” nihilism.

Besides, Buddha himself acted contrary to his own doctrines (and I’m not talking about his evolution from a skinny but rich noble into a fat pacifist sitting under a tree): he claimed the above concept (i.e: “Just give up on this world, and your stress will go away, so you won’t have to be endlessly reincarnated and suffer any more pains, fears of those pains, and hopes of no pains, any more; you’ll “succeed” in not existing at all (attain ‘Nirvana’”) … but then even he didn’t follow through on that, choosing instead to somehow “stand in the doorway” to Nirvana, helping to usher in lesser ‘spiritualy evolved’ humans, one can assume through education somehow. But by doing so, he embodied the notion that love of his fellow man (self-sacrifice) was a higher ideal than attaining Nirvana, which is exactly what Jesus later said, after living in India and studying Buddhism. Many of Jesus’ own words are inscribed in Buddhist caves pre-dating Christianity by many years … word for word, paragraph for paragraph!

So, while both islam and Buddhism advise Submitting to the fear of pain, despair and failure in this world, in pretending that Giving Up is a holy virtue, Buddhism advocates for pre-forgiving, delinquently infantile negligent total non-violence (it’s even against the defense of one’s self and of innocent others), ultimately it does advocate for self-sacrificing love, while islam commands the exact opposite, criminal stance: victim-blaming violence and the sacrifice of others to assuage one’s own subjective fears of pain.

But anyway, the root doctrines of Buddhism are all nonsense, too, because the whole thinking process is ongoing, in learning to faces one’s fears of pains in order to find out how to solve the problems and correct the mistakes (‘sins’) which cause those pains, in order to be able to get to having the valid hope of no pains.

Abstracting contextually dynamic, situationally evolving problems and solutions, mistakes and corrections as static “sins” (or even “Dharma”) is idolatry. And like all idolatry, the concept of “Karma” is pure predeterminism.

Existentialism IS only Nihilism, and vice-versa; neither approach offers any solutions.

But the difference between Buddhism and islam is that Buddhism is peaceful nihilism; islam is violent, aggresssive, criminal nihilism; so islam is literally infinitely worse than Buddhism.

PPS: Some people assert that “All religions are the same in the only area that counts – control of the masses.”

I’d have to disagree with that, too, as far as the specifics go; for instance: Islam micro-manages which hand one must use to wipe one’s own arse with, and which foot one must use to first step into the washroom in order to do it.

All “other” religions only offer advice, (and I put the word “other” in quotes because islam is NOT a religion at all, much less one “of peace”) or at worst only make threats that their god or gods will carry out, while only islam says:

“Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”