Archive for April, 2013

Robert Sibley chokes on his own vomit

April 29, 2013

Once-esteemed author and religions-scholar Robert Sibley recently became an employee of the liberal rag “The Ottawa Citizen” (not-so-affectionately known by the locals as the ‘Snottawa Snitizen’) and decided to editorialize for them. Becoming politically correct (factually incorrect; a liar and fraud) may not have been the best decision Mr. Sibley ever made, and here’s how and why:

(Since the SS has a funny habit of “disappearing” its own articles when challenged, I’ve decided to reproduce the whole thing, below). I’ve put his most obvious twaddle in bold, and as is often the case, my take on it all is presented in outraged, screaming CAPS.

Today, he decided to pontificate on their dime about the “root causes” of “youth radicalization,” here:

Young men can be turned to good or evil

By Robert Sibley, Ottawa Citizen April 28, 2013

How do we account for young men turning to terrorism?

We were transfixed recently by the drama of the hunt for two men suspected to be the perpetrators of the Boston Marathon bombings. The week before we were made aware that two youthful Canadian citizens from London, Ont., were among the terrorists killed in the January assault on an Algerian gas plant, while a third is in a Mauritanian jail and a fourth being sought for possible terrorist connections. Elsewhere, too, in the United States and Britain, two groups of young men, all identified as Muslim and self-described as Islamists, have recently been convicted. In 2006, an Islamist group of young men in the Toronto area, the so-called Toronto 18, with a bucket list that included blowing up Parliament and beheading the prime minister, were exposed by the security services. Many were born in Canada, the children of immigrants. And most recently, two other men, a 35-year-old Torontonian and a 30-year-old Montrealer, are alleged to have been planning to blow up a Toronto-to-New York passenger train.

How do we understand this? To ask such a question is not to excuse or otherwise wring our hands about how these young men might have felt excluded from society. One of the alleged marathon bombers whined on his Facebook page that “I don’t have a single American friend. I just don’t understand them.”

Since when did alienation and self-pity provide a moral licence for mass murder?

GOOD POINT, QUICKLY FORGOTTEN.

;-(

That said, it is worthwhile to try to understand how seemingly ordinary young men, and presumably enjoying the bounty of western societies, could be turned into Islamist terrorists.

In the Boston case, the two suspects, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 19 and 26 respectively, were brothers of Chechen origin, who, it appears, came with their families to the United States where they attended high school and college. Tamerlan was studying engineering — something he likely wouldn’t have been able to do in his war-torn homeland. Dzhokhar was apparently well-liked by his classmates, served the disabled as a volunteer and a captain on his school’s wrestling team.

Naturally everyone wants to know how typical teenagers become terrorists. “We need to understand these kids,” said Wael Haddara, a board member of a London mosque.

PURE TAQIYYA AND KITMAN: ANY MOSQUE MEMBER KNOWS THE QUR’AN’S TERROR IMPERATIVES BY ROTE! WHY WOULD SIBLEY BOTHER TO INTERVIEW SUCH A CUNT?!

“This is an American boy,” Mishy Lesser, an American consultant who specializes in developing young community leaders, said in reference to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. “How did he become a hater?”

UMMM … “BECAUSE THE QUR’AN SPECIFICALLY TEACHES HATE, AND LOTS OF IT!”?

Good questions. So far, though, the responses in some cases have been the usual clichés — the corrupting influence of the Internet, the blandishments of a behind-the-scenes religious leader, and, according to media portrayals, personal disappointments that life didn’t provide them with more recognition, more money, more girls. No doubt, some of these factors figure in the radicalization of these young men.

LET’S QUICKLY EXAMINE THE ALLEGED DIFFERENCE BETWEEN “MODERATE” AND “RADICAL” MOSLEMS:

RADICAL MOSLEMS WANT TO KILL YOU.

MODERATE MOSLEMS WANT RADICAL MOSLEMS TO KILL YOU.

MOST SIMPLY PUT: THERE ARE NO MODERATE MOSLEMS BECAUSE THERE IS NO MODERATE ISLAM. THERE IS ONLY ONE QUR’AN, AND IT TEACHES ALL MOSLEMS THAT IT IS NOT ONLY THEIR HOLY RIGHT, BUT ALSO THEIR DUTY TO THEIR GOD, TO EXTORT, ENSLAVE, AND MURDER ALL THE NON-MOSLEMS IN THE WORLD, SIMPLY FOR THEIR “CRIMES” OF NOT BEING MOSLEMS. THE QUR’AN IS A PERMANENT DEATH-THREAT AND AN US-VERSUS-THEM, MIGHT-MAKES-RIGHT ONGOING HATE-CRIME ALL BY ITSELF.

Why would someone who grew up in a liberal society, provided with at least some of the benefits of the secular West, turn against that society? As President Barack Obama put it recently, “Why did young men who grew up and studied here as part of our communities and our country resort to such violence?”

FROM SOMEONE WHOSE OWN PAST ALLEGEDLY INCLUDES MURDERING GAY LOVERS…

Perhaps Plato had the answer. The ancient Greek philosopher recognized that the most dangerous creature in the world is a young man of limited education. His Socratic dialogue, The Republic, explores the need to educate young men to noble purpose, training them to direct their desires — their spirits, in other words — to the well-being of the city.

THIS IS INDEED ONE OF THE PROBLEMS; THE REAL PROBLEM BEING WHEN ISLAMIC TERROR IS MIS-CATEGORIZED BY BEING ALLUDED TO AS ‘DEFENSIVE NATIONALISM’ IN WHICH CASE ‘THE CITY’ TO BE DEFENDED, IS “SOME OTHER MUSLIM’S CITIES,” AND THE WHO THEY MUST BE DEFENDED FROM – IS “ALL THE NON-MUSLIMS IN THE WORLD!”

For Plato, a young man’s “spiritedness” informed his character and conduct. Unless that spiritedness was educated for worthy ends it could easily degenerate into conduct harmful to the city. That is to say, young men can be turned to both good and evil. The spiritedness that prompts them to noble purpose can also be misdirected to violence if their psyches are miseducated.

AND JUST WHO WOULD BE DOING THIS “MIS-EDUCATING” TODAY?

GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA!!!

Unfortunately, modern secular society can fail to provide young men with a positive sense of meaning that satisfies their spiritedness. The acquisition of technological trinkets and vicarious living through video games is not a meaning-filled life. Some, as we’ve seen, turn to violence to provide them with a sense of purpose.

Psychologically-speaking, this should not surprise anyone.

Islamist terrorism is a response, however morally and intellectually incoherent, to the perceived dissatisfactions of modernity with its contradictory mix of material prosperity and spiritual poverty. To say this doesn’t excuse terrorism.

LIAR!!! YES, IT DOES, SIBLEY! BECAUSE ISLAMIC – NOT “ISLAM-IST” – TERRORISM IS AN INTRINSIC SACRAMENT OF ISLAM ITSELF, WHICH PRE-DATES MODERN SOCIETY BY 1,400 YEARS, OVER 1,000 YEARS BEFORE THE CREATION OF AMERICA ITSELF!  HENCE, ISLAM CANNOT BE A “RESPONSE” TO MODERNITY! AND TO PRETEND ISLAM IS A “RESPONSE” TO SPIRITUAL POVERTY AND MATERIAL PROSPERITY, IS STARK-RAVING INSANITY ALL ON ITS OWN, SINCE ISLAM ITSELF EMBODIES SPIRITUAL POVERTY AND PURE MATERIALISM!

THE MOSLEM’S OWN “ALLAH” IS DEFINED AS UNKNOWN AND UNKNOWABLE – SO WHEN YOUR “GOD” IS GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS “EVERYTHING,” IT’S ALSO THEREBY MOST SPECIFICALLY DEFINED AS “NOTHING!” EXISTENTIALISM IS NIHILISM! ALLAH IS MORE SHIT-HAPPENS THAN HA-SHEM!

SO ALL MOSLEMS ARE ALSO ATHEISTS! EVEN MUHAMMAD HIMSELF WAS UNABLE TO GET AN ANSWER DIRECT FROM HIS UNKNOWABLE IMPERSONAL IDOL – EVEN HE HAD TO GO THROUGH A SUPERNATURAL INTERMEDIARY, “THE ARCH-ANGEL GEBRIL.” MOE MAY HAVE PRAYED TO ALLAH, BUT ALLAH NEVER PERSONALLY ANSWERED EVEN HIM.

AND THE MOSLEMS HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO FAITH IN EVEN THEIR OWN GOD’S OWN DESIRES NOR ABILITY TO ENFORCE EVEN IT’S OWN US-VERUS-THEM AND MIGHT-MAKES-RIGHT CREEDS!

WHEREAS ALL “REAL” RELIGIONS, AT WORST, ONLY SAY:

“OBEY OUR SILLY RULES, OR GOD (/’THE GODS’) WILL GET YOU!”

ONLY ISLAM SAYS:

“OBEY OUR SILLY RULES, OR WE WILL GET YOU (‘FOR GOD’)!”

AND ISLAM IS ALL ABOUT THE ACQUISITION OF TREASURE, SLAVES AND OTHER “BOOTY” HERE – THERE IS NOTHING THAT IS NOT MATERIALISM WITHIN “SPIRITUALLY” EMPTY ISLAM! THERE IS NOTHING TO RAISE THE HUMAN SPIRIT WITH HOPE; AS THEIR UNKNOWABLY UNKNOWN GOD CANNOT AND WILL NOT TALK TO NOR REASON WITH ANY OF THEM – IT IS AS UNRESPONSIVE AS THOSE DUMB ROCK IDOLS THEY USED TO WORSHIP, AND SO IT CANNOT BE ADMIRED NOR LOVED, BUT ONLY FEARED AND OBEYED!

You might feel modern society is devoid of worthy existential significance — I have that sensibility myself some days — but that doesn’t sanction killing others.

Nonetheless, terrorism, particularly in the name of God (or Allah), clearly provides some young men with a purposiveness they can’t find elsewhere.

SINCE “CRIME” ISN’T AN END IN ITSELF, AS AN IDEOLOGY, THE ONLY REASON YOUNG KIDS TODAY FALL INTO THE “GOD TOLD US TO COMMIT THESE CRIMES!” TRAP OF ISLAM, IS BECAUSE IT HAS BEEN MIS-CATEGORIZED AND MIS-REPRESENTED TO THEM BY COWARDLY TRAITORS IN THE GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA – SUCH AS BY YOUR SELF!

“The terrorist is fundamentally an ‘altruist,’” writes Bruce Hoffman, an American scholar who studies terrorism. The terrorist “believes he is serving a ‘good’ cause designed to achieve a greater good for a wider constituency — whether real or imagined.”

SEE? THE PERFECT EXAMPLE OF SOME “CRISIS-RELIEF MANAGEMENT EXPERT” SALESMAN, WHOSE REAL MOTTO CAN ONLY BE: “THERE’S NO MONEY IN SOLUTIONS!”

ALTRUISM IS THE MOST COLDLY-CALCULATING, INTELLIGENT RESPONSE TO OTHER’S FEAR AND GREED-BASED THREATS TO ONE’S SELF: IN MIRRORING THOSE “OTHERS” AS ONE’S SELF, ONE REALIZES, UPON SUCH REFLECTION, THAT THE BEST WAY TO DISABLE THEIR FEARS AND ASSUAGE THEIR GREEDS, IS TO MAKE THEM FEEL SAFE AND HAPPY, RESPECTIVELY. TO FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE, TO MAKE THEM FEEL EVEN MORE UNSAFE AND UNHAPPY, TO NEGATE ONE’S FEAR OF THE OTHERS BY MAKING THEM FEEL EVEN MORE FEARFUL OF ONE’S SELF, IS NOT “ALTRUISM,” BUDDY!!!! IT’S ONLY TERRORISM!

PERHAPS HE MEANT “IDEALISM” IN STEAD OF “ALTRUISM” – BECAUSE ALL IDEAL IDEA WORSHIP IS IDOLATRY; IDEALOGUES WORSHIP IMAGE OVER REALITY, AND PERFECTIONISM OVER HUMAN LIFE: THEY “PROTECT” THE FUTURE BY KILLING THE REAL HUMAN LIVES WHICH THEY PRETEND THREATEN IT IN THE PRESENT.

ISLAM IS THE PRIMITIVE, BARBARIAN’S INSTINCTIVE NON-THINKING, AND DEFINITELY NON-ALTRUISTIC, RESPONSE TO FEAR OF PAIN AND THE GREEDY HOPE OF NO PAIN!

ISLAM IS TERRORISM; TERRORISM IS EXTORTION, AND EXTORTION IS ALWAYS A CRIME!

Of course, the terrorist has to overcome the commonly accepted ethos that deliberately killing innocent people is inherently wrong. But then the psychological strain of conceiving murder in altruistic terms betrays the terrorist’s disconnect between his “ideal” and the moral reality shared by most others. As political philosopher Barry Cooper observes in his 2004 study, New Political Religions, the terrorist occupies “an imaginary reality” where killing the innocent can be justified to others as heroic. Cooper describes this mental act as “moral insanity.”

THE IDEA THAT DELIBERATELY KILLING INNOCENT PEOPLE IS WRONG ISN’T ONLY A “COMMONLY ACCEPTED ETHOS” BECAUSE IT DEFINES MORALITY: WHEN ONE CHOOSES TO ATTACK FIRST, ONE’S OWN CHOICE DEFINES ONE AS THE PREDATORY, CRIMINAL AGGRESSOR, AND THEY AS ONE’S INNOCENT VICTIMS – THERE’S NO TWO WAYS ABOUT IT! AND THAT SIMPLE, GOLDEN RULE (“DO NOT ATTACK FIRST”) DEFINES MORALITY!

ALL MATTERS OF “ETHOS, COMMONLY ACCEPTED” OR NOT, ARE MERELY SYMPTOMS OF ETHICS, OR THE WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHY, HOW AND WHY OF WHAT TO DO ONCE ONE HAS DECIDED TO BREAK THAT ONE, FIRST, GOLDEN RULE AND BECOME IMMORAL.

“ETHICS” ARE FOR PEOPLE WITHOUT MORALITY!

“MORAL INSANITY” DESCRIBES MUHAMMAD, JUST AS IT DOES EVERY OTHER CRIMINAL.

Philosopher Eric Voegelin coined the word “pneumopathological” to describe those who are morally insane, “living,” as it were, in a fantasy world of self-righteousness.

MERE SELF-SERVING IDOLATRY; WHY NOT SIMPLY CALL IT “MORAL INSANITY!”?

We are all fantasists to one degree or another, longing for a world more in accordance with our desires. But most of us grow up to recognize our dreams as unrealistic, the projections of vain egoism, and make our accommodations between reality and fantasy as best we can.

SUBJECTIVITY IS CRIME; THE NOTION ONE CAN HAVE RIGHTS WITHOUT RESPONSIBILITY.

Terrorists, however, insist their dream world must be the real world. Possessed of this pneumopathological consciousness, they deny what Voegelin refers to as our “first” or “common” reality in favour of a “second reality” in which they conjure their actions — blowing up subways, for example — will bend the world to suit their fantasies.

WHAT AN ASSHOLE! PRETENDING THERE ARE OBJECTIVELY DIFFERENT, SUBJECTIVE “REALITIES” WHEN IN FACT ALL HE’S DESCRIBING IS SOME TWAT PRETENDING TO REVERSE CAUSE AND EFFECT TO BLAME HIS OWN VICTIMS FOR HIS OWN ATTACKS ON THEM! YOUR “SECOND REALITY” IS IN REALITY, ONLY A LIE; FRAUD; SLANDER; CRIME!

Voegelin regarded this “second-reality” thinking as a deformation of the human spirit, a distortion of consciousness that allowed people to justify evil as a necessary expression of spirituality. In the case of the Islamist terrorist, he is engaged in an apocalyptic struggle with evil enemies — all those non-Muslims — who must be destroyed. As Cooper puts it, “For terrorists participating imaginatively in a cosmic struggle, the purpose of what amounts to limitless killing is clear.” Thus, the terrorist can justify mass murder as a “righteous search for peace.”

NO SHIT SHERLOCK; ISLAM (OR ‘PACIFICATION’) EMBODIES THE CRIMINAL’S BACKWARDS ALIBI NOTION THAT THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS; WHEN OF COURSE, IN REALITY, THE MEANS ONLY EVER DEFINE THE END RESULTS: WHEN YOU LIE, KILL AND STEAL TO GET YOUR WAY, IN THE END YOU’RE NOT A GREAT SUCCESS, BUT ONLY A LYING, MURDERING THIEF!

Is there any reasonable response to this disorder of consciousness? How do you prevent the spiritual deformation of young men? I’ve already alluded to Plato’s solution. He understood that the “spirit” that drives men to violence and destruction can also propel to them build cathedrals, create art and perform acts of heroism — if they are rightly educated.

WELL, “HMM, THAT’S A REAL POSER, ISN’T IT, GENIUS!?” LET’S START WITH THE FACT THAT YOUR OWN SUBCONSCIOUS JUST ANSWERED YOUR OWN QUESTION: THE RIGHT WAY TO EDUCATE PEOPLE IS TO NOT CALL PRE-POSTEROUS EXCUSES FOR CRIMES “DISORDERS OF CONSCIOUSNESS” AND ESPECIALLY NOT “SPIRITUAL DEFORMATIONS.”

LET’S TELL THEM THEY CAN’T PRETEND THEIR VICTIMS STARTED IT, NOR THAT KILLING EVERYONE ELSE WILL MAKE THEM FEEL ULTIMATELY SAFE AND HAPPY. LET’S TELL THEM THE ENDS DON’T JUSTIFY THE MEANS, AND THAT GOD DIDN’T SANCTION CRIME.

The fact that young men such as Ali Medlej and Xristos Katsiroubas, the Londoners in the Algeria attacks, were susceptible to the temptations of jihad suggests their inherent, if inchoate, desire for strong meaning and high purpose was not adequately satisfied in western secular society, at least as far as they were concerned. Both Aaron Yoon, now in prison in Mauritania, and Katsiroubas were converts to Islam.

YES, BECAUSE ISLAM’S THE ONLY CRIME SYNDICATE THAT SAYS:

“GOD MADE ME DO IT!”

But it is also perhaps telling that all are the second-generation progeny of immigrant families. The families of Medlej and Ryan Enderi, another London youth connected to the Algeria attack, are from Lebanon, while Katsiroubas’s parents came from Greece and Yoon’s from Korea.

SINCE WHEN DO GREEKS OR KOREANS ENGAGE IN TERROR, WITHOUT JOINING ISLAM?!

THIS LINE OF SELF-DECEIT NEGATES YOUR INITIAL “Since when did alienation and self-pity provide a moral licence for mass murder? ” CLAIM (ABOVE) – YOU COWARD!

Did this circumstance foster psychological — spiritual?

PSYCHOLOGY IS VERY SIMPLE:

Psychology is very basic, binary stuff; it applies equally to all machines and animals in the universe, no matter where or when. Our emotions range in a simple binary continuum from pain, the fear of pain (fear is only the generalized memory of pain, abstracted from situational contexts, projected to the future) and the hope of no pain (hope is only the summarized memory of the relief from pain, projected to the future).

All moslems simply fear the painful confusing dynamics of life, and so favor the “safe” stasis of unending death (which is also why they hide their women’s life-giving powers of attraction under their own funeral shrouds).

They aren’t scared of dying simply because they ARE scared of living.

Their stated ideal idea (idol) of a “god” is one both unknown and unknowable, so their ‘religion’ is nothing more than focusing on their own fears of pain as their god. Since their god is generally only “everything!” (which negates morality and free will) it’s also specifically “nothing” (existentialism IS nihilism)!

They hate freedom because it implies personal self-reliant responsibility!

…and… “SPIRITUALISM” DOESN’T EXIST, YOU IDOLATER FRAUD!

conflicts that rendered them amenable to extremist religious thought?

“EXTREMIST RELIGIOUS THOUGHT!”? YOU MEAN, WHERE CHRISTIAN EXTREMISTS ADVICE PEOPLE TO BE “EXTREMELY” LOVING”! OR TO BE “EXTREMELY” HATEFUL, AS IN ISLAM?

FALSE CATEGORIZATIONS ARE THE ONLY PROBLEM HERE, IN MIS-EDUCATING YOUTH!

AND YOU’RE NOW AS EQUALLY GUILTY OF THIS CHILD ABUSE CRIME AS MUHAMMAD, BECAUSE YOU’RE GOING ALONG WITH HIS EXCUSES AND LYING ALIBIS, ENABLING THEM!

Was there a conflict between the secular norms of Canadian society and the traditions of their families? Enderi reportedly refused to sing O Canada at school, claiming his Muslim faith forbid it.

OF COURSE HIS MOSLEM FAITH (GLOBAL CONQUEST) FORBADE HIM FROM IDOLIZING A NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY, SINCE ISLAM REGARDS THEM ALL AS TEMPORARY MAN-MADE FALSE IDOLS, ALL OF WHICH ARE TO BE EVENTUALLY DESTROYED AND REPLACED BY THEIR ONE-WORLD MOSLEM UMMAH, TO BE RULED BY THEIR THEOCRATIC CALIPHATE!

ISLAM IS GLOBALIZATION, IT’S INHERENTLY SEDITIOUS TOWARDS ALL NATIONALITIES!

To ask such questions is not to indulge in sentimental “root cause” speculation,

NO – IT’S OBVIOUSLY AN ATTEMPTED DEFLECTION ON YOUR PART TO AVOID THEM ALL!

but rather to highlight the need for effective and inspirational institutions of governance, civil society (churches, mosques, community groups, etc.) and, especially, education. Such institutions are psychologically crucial as a means for providing young men with worthy moral standards,

YOU CLEARLY STILL DON’T UNDERSTAND THIS WORD, “MORALITY!” (SEE ABOVE)!

markers of noble conduct and, perhaps most importantly, spiritual direction.

SO, TO ROBERT SIBLEY: “MOSQUES ARE PSYCHOLOGICALLY CRUCIAL INSPIRATIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF CIVIL SOCIETY GOVERNANCE AND WORTHY MORAL EDUCATION!”?!?!?!

MOSQUES ARE STILL REALLY ONLY TERRORIST INDOCTRINATION CENTRES, TRAITOR!

Civilizations stand or fall on the spiritedness of young men.

ISLAM IS NOT A CIVILIZATION – IT’S A SAVAGE BARBARITY!

Robert Sibley is a senior writer for the Citizen, currently seconded to the editorial board.

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen
……….

We obey the Golden Rule of Law, which, by simply defining all situational morality as: “Do Not Attack First!” enables trust, progress, and Civilization.

(See all “Western” countries)!

They obey the brazen rule of chaos, which embodies immorality as: “Our god says we always have to attack all ‘The Others’ first!” and so inflicts distrust, stagnation, and Barbarism.
(See all ‘moslem’ countries)!

THEREFORE, IT’S OBVIOUS THAT:

Our government, educators, and media are all complicit in the crime of “radicalizing youths” towards islamic terrorism, simply because they not only deliberately allow, but also actively encourage, islam to be mis-categorized as a religion, as a defensive nationalist movement, etc, by pretending its own symptoms (jihad terrorist groups such as ‘Al-Quaeda’ and ‘the Taliban’) are separate from their very own, one and only “root cause:” ISLAM itself!

Robery Sibley used to know this, in fact, he once wrote one of the best exposes of islamic evil, ever, here!

;-(

And even more evidence of the easy spread of this crime, is the very next article in the Citizen, by those wacky young idealists, the brothers Kielburger, who laud the islamist “Karl Wolf (in sheep’s clothing) for being, as they quote him saying, “”It’s a subtle thing. People don’t realize it’s happening. I’m like a Trojan horse – but in a good way,” Wolf laughs.” about his being the muslim rap music ambassador infecting Western youth with muslim Arabic “culture” norms:

Karl Wolf bridges the rift between East and West

By Craig and Marc Kielburger, Ottawa Citizen April 28, 2013

A FEW HIGHLIGHTS FROM THIS PRIME EXAMPLE OF UNEDUCATED, PUERILE DHIMMITUDE:

“We find it interesting that, in an age marked by a gaping chasm of distrust between Western and Middle Eastern cultures — especially in the years since 9/11 — here is an artist who has achieved prominence and built a following among both North American and Arabic youth.”

MNYESSS – IT’S “INTERESITNG” HOW “GAPING CHASMS OF DISTRUST” CAN COME TO EXIST BETWEEN VIOLENT MURDERERS AND THEIR POTENTIAL VICTIMS, ISN’T IT, KIDS?

With one foot on each side of the divide, Wolf believes he is an ambassador for Arabic culture in North America. It raises the question: can a popular music influence the international cultural perceptions of a new generation, creating better understanding between East and West?

WELL, NOT ULTIMATELY, SINCE ISLAM FORBIDS MUSIC AND SENTENCES ALL MUSICIANS TO HELL (UNLESS THEY PROMOTE ISLAMIC DOMINATION TO DHIMMIS IN STEALTH JIHAD)!

When Wolf was three, his family fled Lebanon to Dubai in the United Arab Emirates. When he was 15, his family moved to Montreal, where he is now based.

Wolf tells us he spent much of his youth trying to hide his ethnic roots. “I was really against being Arabic, I never really wanted to embrace that. Even in high school in Dubai I was always preparing to be a North American.”

But as he got older and built his music career, Wolf drew inspiration from his father, which caused him to reflect on his origins and the beauty of Lebanese culture. News reports about the Middle East after 9/11, however, portrayed Arabic peoples in a way that did not match his own experience — the music and dance, and the “crazy” parties his parents would throw. “It was only when I started with my music that I realized I could start being an ambassador. I could be the guy to show that, hey, we are cool.”

BEING A CHILD FROM A MUSLIM FAMILY WHO GREW UP IN CHRISTIAN LEBANON, (BEFORE HIS TERRORIST FATHER WHISKED THE FAMILY AWAY TO THE UAE TO HIDE) YOUNG WOLF DIDN’T UNDERSTAND THAT THE CRAZY PARTIES HE’D SEEN GROWING UP WEREN’T A PRODUCT OF ISLAM BUT EXISTED IN SPITE OF IT; HE STILL DOESN’T GET IT.

By incorporating Arabic beats and rhythms into his songs, Wolf says he is introducing North American youth to Arabic culture, turning the strange and foreign into the familiar and popular.

JUST SOME MORE TYPICAL VICTIM-BLAMING SLANDER, ASSERTING THE ONLY REASON ISLAM’S POTENTIAL VICTIMS FEAR IT IS BECAUSE THEY MUST BE BIGOTTED RACISTS.

Centuries of mistrust between cultures won’t be overcome with a song or two. However a new generation on both sides is listening to an artist whose music and personal history represent a fusion of two worlds.

Sometimes one experience in common is enough to start a conversation between strangers that can lead to understanding and friendship.

NOTHING LIKE IGNORANCE IS BLISS, RIGHT, IDEALISTIC AND ALTRUISTIC YOUNG PHILANTHROPIST HUG-THE-WORLD KIELBURGERS? HUG A TERRORIST TODAY! WHEE!

SO GET BACK ON YOUR TRIKES, KIDDIES – DISCUSSING CRIME-FIGHTING IS FOR ADULTS.

;-(

TAMERLANE

April 23, 2013

“Nothing to do with islam,” terrorist’s father says

– while naming his kid after THIS GUY!

TAMERLANE

TAMERLANE

TAMERLANE

*The Timurid Jihad Conquests – An Overview*

Amir Timur (whose name signifies “Iron” in Turkish) was born at Kash (Shahr-i-Sebz, the “Green City”) in Transoxiana (some fifty miles south of Samarkand in modern Uzbekistan), on April 8 (or 11), 1336 CEo Amir Turghay, his father, was chief of the Gurgan or Chagtai branch of the Barlas Turks. By age thirty-four (1369/70), Timur had killed his major rival (Mir Husain), becoming the preeminent ruler of Transoxiana. He spent the next six to seven years consolidating his power in Transoxiana before launching the aggressive conquests of Persia, Afghanistan, and Iraq, and then attacking Hindustan (India) under the tottering Delhi Sultanate.

Rene Grousset contrasts Jenghiz Khan’s “straightforward planning” and “clean sweeps” with the “higgledy-piggledy” order of Timur’s expeditions, and the often incomplete nature of the latter’s conquests:

Tamerlane’s [Timur’s] conquering activities were carried on from the Volga to Damascus, from Smyrna to the Ganges and the Yulduz, and his expeditions into these regions followed no geographical order. He sped from Tashkent to Shiraz, from Tabriz to Khodzhent, as enemy aggression dictated; a campaign in Russia occurred between two in Persia, an expedition into Central Asia between two raids into the Caucasus. … [Timur] at the end of every successful campaign left the country without making any dispositions for its control except Khwarizm and Persia, and even there not until the very end. It is true that he slaughtered all his enemies as thoroughly and conscientiously as the great Mongol, and the pyramids of human heads left behind him as a warning example tell their own tale.

Just one of Timur's many pyramids of trophy skulls

Just one of Timur’s many pyramids of trophy skulls

Yet the survivors forgot the lesson given them and soon resumed secret or overt attempts at rebellion, so that it was all to do again. It appears too, that these bloodsoaked pyramids diverted [Timur] from the essential objective. Baghdad, Brussa (Bursa), Sarai, Kara Shahr, and Delhi were all sacked by him, but he did not overcome the Ottoman Empire, the Golden Horde, the khanate of Mogholistan, or the Indian Sultanate; and even the Jelairs of Iraq ‘Arabi rose up again as soon as he had passed. Thus he had to conquer Khwarizm three times, the ill six or seven times (without ever managing to hold it for longer than the duration of the campaign), eastern Persia twice, western Persia at least three times, in addition to waging two campaigns in Russia. . . [Timur’s] campaigns “always had to be fought again,” and fight them again he did.

Timur’s campaigns are infamous for their extensive massacres and emblematic “pyramids of heads.” E. G. Brown cites “only a few” prominent examples:

As specimens of those acts mention may be made of his massacre of the people of Sistan 1383-4, when he caused some two thousand prisoners to be built up into a wall; his cold-blooded slaughter of a hundred thousand captive Indians near Dihli [Delhi] (December, 1398); his burying alive of four thousand Armenians in 1400-1, and the twenty towers of skulls erected by him at Aleppo and Damascus in the same year; and his massacre of 70,000 of the inhabitants of Isfahan in (November, 1387).

Grousset emphasizes the important Islamic motivation for Timur’s campaigns: “It is the Qur’an to which he continually appeals, the imams and dervishes who prophesy his success. His wars were to influence the character of the jihad, the Holy War, even when – as was almost always the case – he was fighting Muslims. He had only to accuse these Muslims of lukewarmness, whether the Jagataites of the IIi and Uiguria, whose conversion was so recent, or the Sultans of Delhi who … refrained from massacring their millions of Hindu subjects.”

The Turkish chronicle *Malfuzat-i-Timuri,* a putative autobiographical memoir of Timur, translated into Persian by Abu Talib Husaini, illustrates these driving sentiments, complete with a Qur’ anic quotation:

About this time there arose in my heart the desire to lead an expedition against the infidels, and to become a ghazi; for it had reached my ears that the slayer of infidels is a ghazi, and if he is slain he becomes a martyr. It was on this account that I formed this resolution, but I was undetermined in my mind whether I should direct my expedition against the infidels of China or against the infidels and polytheists of India. In this matter I sought an omen from the Qur’an, and the verse I opened upon [Q66:9] was this, “O Prophet, make war upon infidels and unbelievers, and treat them with severity.” My great officers told me that the inhabitants of Hindustan were infidels and unbelievers. In obedience to the order of Almighty Allah I ordered an expedition against them.

Timur’s jihad campaigns against non-Muslims – whether Christians in Asia Minor and Georgia or Hindus in India – seemed to intensify in brutality. Brown highlights one particular episode that supports this contention, wherein Timur clearly distinguished between his vanquished Muslim and non-Muslim foes. After rampaging through (Christian) Georgia, where he “devastated the country, destroyed the churches, and slew great numbers of inhabitants,” in the winter of 1399-1400, Timur, in August 1400, “began his march into Asia Minor by way of Avnik, Erzeroum, Erzinjan, and Sivas. The latter place offered a stubborn resistance, and when it finally capitulated Timur caused all the Armenian and Christian soldiers to be buried alive; but the Muhammadans he spared.”

TYPICAL; BURYING ALIVE PRISONERS OF WAR WHO HAD SURRENDERED.

;-(

The unparalleled devastation Timur wrought upon predominantly Hindu India further bolsters the notion that Timur viewed his non-Muslim prey with particular animosity. Moreover; there are specific examples of selective brutality directed against Hindus, cited in the *Malfuzat-i-Timuri,* from which Muslims are deliberately spared:

My great object in invading Hindustan had been to wage a religious war against the infidel Hindus, and it now appeared to me that it was necessary for me to put down these Jats [Hindus]. On the 9th of the month I dispatched the baggage from Tohana, and on the same day I marched into the jungles and wilds, and slew 2,000 demon-like Jats. I made their wives and children captives, and plundered their cattle and property. . . . On the same day a party of saiyids, who dwelt in the vicinity, came with courtesy and humility to wait upon me and were very graciously received. In my reverence for the race of the prophet, I treated their chiefs with great honour.

On the 29th I again marched and reached the river Jumna. On the other side of the river I [viewed] a fort, and upon making inquiry about it, I was informed that it consisted of a town and fort, called Loni. . . . I determined to take that fort at once. . . . Many of the Rajputs placed their wives and children in their houses and burned them, then they rushed to the battle and were killed. Other men of the garrison fought and were slain, and a great many were taken prisoners. Next day I gave orders that the Musalman prisoners should be separated and saved, but that the infidels should all be despatched to hell with the proselytizing sword. I also ordered that the houses of the saiyids, shaikhs and learned Musulmans should be preserved but that all the other houses should be plundered and the fort destroyed. It was done as I directed and a great booty was obtained. On the 16th of the month some incidents occurred which led to the sack of the city of Delhi, and to the slaughter of many of the infidel inhabitants. . . . On that day, Thursday, and all the night of Friday, nearly 15,000 Turks were engaged in slaying, plundering, and destroying. … The following day, Saturday, the 17th, all passed in the same way, and the spoil was so great that each man secured from fifty to a hundred prisoners – men, women, and children. There was no man who took less than twenty. The other booty was immense in rubies, diamonds, pearls and other gems; jewels of gold and silver, ashrafis, tankas of gold and silver of the celebrated’ Alai coinage; vessels of gold and silver; and brocades and silks of great value. Gold and silver ornaments of the Hindu women were obtained in such quantities as to exceed all account. Excepting the quarter of the saiyids, the ‘ulama and the other Musulmans, the whole city was sacked.

Timur left Samarkand with a large, powerful expeditionary force destined for India in April 1398. By October he had besieged Talamba, seventy-five miles northeast of Multan,  subsequently plundering the town and massacring its inhabitants. He reached the vicinity of Delhi during the first week of December having forged a path of destruction – pillaging, razing, and massacring – en route through Pat Patan, Dipalpur, Bhatnar, Sirsa, and Kaithal. Prior to fighting and defeating an army under Sultan Nasir-ud-din Mahmud Tughluq on December 17, 1398, Timur had his forces butcher in cold blood one hundred thousand Hindu prisoners accumulated while advancing toward Delhi.22o A. L. Srivastava describes what transpired after Timur’s forces occupied Delhi on December 18, 1398:

The citizens of the capital, headed by the ulema, waited on the conqueror and begged quarter. Timur agreed to spare the citizens; but, owing to the oppressive conduct of the soldiers of the invading force, the people of the city were obliged to offer resistance. Timur now ordered a general plunder and massacre which lasted for several days. Thousands of the citizens of Delhi were murdered and thousands were made prisoners. A historian writes: “High towers were built with the head of the Hindus, and their bodies became the food of ravenous beasts and birds … such of the inhabitants who escaped alive were made prisoners.”

Timur acquired immense booty, as well as Delhi’s best (surviving) artisans, who were conscripted and sent to Samarkand to construct for him the famous Friday mosque. Leaving Delhi on January 1, 1399, for their return march to Samarkand, Timur’s forces stormed Meerut on January 19, before encountering and defeating two Hindu armies near Hardwar. The Malfuzat-i-Timuri indicates that at Hardwar, Timur’s army displayed great courage and daring; they made their swords their banners, and exerted themselves in slaying the foe (during a bathing festival on the bank of the Ganges). They slaughtered many of the infidels, and pursued those who fled to the mountains. So many of them were killed that their blood ran down the mountains and plain, and thus (nearly) all were sent to hell. The few who  escaped, wounded, weary, and half dead, sought refuge in the defiles of the hills. Their property and goods, which exceeded all computation, and their countless cows and buffaloes, fell as spoil into the hands of my victorious soldiers.

Timur then traversed the Sivalik Hills to Kanra, which was pillaged and sacked, along with Jammu, “everywhere the inhabitants being slaughtered like cattle.” Srivastava summarizes India’s devastated condition following Timur’s departure:

Timur left [India] prostrate and bleeding. There was utter confusion and misery throughout northern India. [India’s] northwestern provinces, including northern tracts of Rajasthan and Delhi, were so thoroughly ravaged, plundered and even burnt that it took these parts many years, indeed, to recover their prosperity. Lakhs [hundreds of thousands] of men, and in some cases, many women and children, too, were butchered in cold blood. The rabi crops [grown in October/November, harvested around March, including barley, mustard, and wheat] standing in the field were completely destroyed for many miles on both sides of the invader’s long and double route from the Indus to Delhi and back. Stores of grain were looted or destroyed. Trade, coonerce and other signs of material prosperity disappeared. The city of Delhi was depopulated and ruined. It was without a master or a caretaker. There was scarcity and virulent famine in the capital and its suburbs. This was followed by a pestilence caused by the pollution of the air and water by thousands of uncared-for dead bodies. In the words of the historian Badauni, “those of the inhabitants who were left died (of famines and pestilence), while for two months not a bird moved wing in Delhi.”

Tamerlane SMASH!

Tamerlane SMASH!

The thirteenth-century chronicler Bar Hebraeus (d. 1286) provided this contemporary assessment of how the adoption of Islam radically altered Mongol attitudes toward their Christian subjects: “And having seen very much modesty and other habits of this kind among Christian people, certainly the Mongols loved them greatly at the beginning of their kingdom, a time ago somewhat short. But their love hath turned to such intense hatred that they cannot even see them with their eyes approvingly, because they have all alike become Muslims, myriads of people and peoples.”

Bar Hebraeus’s observations should be borne in mind when evaluating Grousset’s uncompromising overall assessment of Timur’s deeds and motivations. After recounting Timur’s 1403 ravages in Georgia, slaughtering the inhabitants, and destroying all the Christian churches of Tiflis, Grousset states:

It has been noted that the Jenghiz-Khanite Mongol invasion of the thirteenth century was less cruel, for the Mongols were mere barbarians who killed simply because for centuries this had been the instinctive behavior of nomad herdsmen toward sedentary farmers. To this ferocity Tamerlane [Timur] added a taste for religious murder. He killed from Qur’anic piety. He represents a synthesis, probably unprecedented in history, of Mongol barbarity and Muslim fanaticism, and symbolizes that advanced form of primitive slaughter which is murder committed for the sake of an abstract ideology, as a duty and a sacred mission.

From Dr. Andrew Bostom’s book, Legacy of Jihad.

ISLAM IS TERRORISM

April 22, 2013

ISLAM IS TERRORISM:

Image

To anyone who has the nerve to look and read about it for themself, it’s obvious that islam is a crime-syndicate, not a religion.

It only invokes the idea of one single god, as their one, single excuse for all their many crimes. This god is clearly defined as being both unknown and unknowable. The only way its desires for humanity can ever be known, its rule-book claims, is through the clear instructions set therein by this one god’s one and only final messenger, Muhammad.

And Muhammad’s book commands all his moslem “believers” to wage perpetual war on all the non, (or “un”-) believers in the world, until the only “religion” (and, since its micro-managing rules give explicit, “god-given” commandments in regard to food preparation, dress codes, etc, their definition of “religion” clearly also means the entire “culture”) remaining on earth is allah’s islam.

Further, this “perpetual war” against the “unbelievers” is NOT one of peaceful proselytizing conversion, because “allah” is clearly stated to have caused their unbelief itself, and so it is described as literally impossible to change the minds, or lead to see, those whose minds have been closed, and eyes blinded, to this “truth,” by allah itself.

And how does Muhammad describe his allah? As a terrorist! (“I will cast terror!”) etc. And as a terrorist whose intention is to also have his followers terrorize those who don’t follow him, until they are even more more feared by his infidel enemies than allah is! And Muhammad exults in allah’s terrorist nature, revelling in how it has benefited him, personally: “I have been made victorious by terror!” In fact, to Muhammad, allah IS Terror; allah IS only Pain incarnate!

And what are the prayers moslems are assigned to pray for so devoutly five times a day? They are told, in accordance with islam’s us-versus-them basics, to pray for their own success and for their enemies’ destruction and damnation; they are told to pray to remind allah to throw the infidels (Christians, Jews and pagans) into Hell to burn them forever!

No, if and when moslems try to slanderously extort others into “reverting,” it is a practice only indulged in by allah as a relief to themselves, to spare the moslems from having to carry out their further, messy, “holy” rights and duties to personally murder all of us!

Morality is doing what’s right regardless of what you’re told.
Authority is doing what you’re told regardless of what’s right.

Most legalists and police officers are authoritarians – those who pretend to believe there is no morality, so the only things which are immoral or unlawful are those which some legislator subjectively and very specifically made forbidden in law. Everything is allowed except that which is expressly forbidden.

They therefore refuse to see that islam is crime, simply because they have already been told by their masters that it isn’t a crime, no matter what its symptoms might indicate.

Political correctness = factual incorrectness (lying; fraud; theft of the Truth; CRIME).

Deliberately maintaining the LIE that Jihad = “peaceful inner struggle,” against ALL the  clear Qur’anic definitions and subsequent historical evidence to the contrary, is not only to wilfully engage in perpetuating the perpetration of the crime of public deception, but to act as a willing accessory enabling all the crimes of our self-determined moslem enemies.

Any lawyer, judge, or politician who engages in such practices is a criminal and an outlaw, and so should be dealt with accordingly.

Islam is only extortion, period. And extortion is always a crime.

Furthermore, if any non-moslem is to believably assert in indulgence of their historical lies, that he or she agrees with the moslems’ claims that islam is a “religion,” (at all, much less one “of peace,”) then they must also supply valid reasons as to why they have chosen to believe in Muhammad’s most basic claims, that “God” has ordered him to order his followers to kill everyone not a member of his gang (like, for instance, the non-moslem now found to be endorsing his lies)!

i.e: If islam is such a valid religion, why does God order you to be murdered by it’s moslem members?

Do you really think that’s a valid way for one of God’s religions to behave?!

Besides being a liberal, what do you think you have done to deserve the moslem god’s eternal scorn and hatred?

Or, more generally,

“Do you believe that islam is NOT a danger to non-moslems?” (and, if so: WHY not?)!

Because here’s the real Truth about islam:

Holy mobster Moslems only hate infidels because the Qur’an says “god” orders them to – Period.

Islam is a threat to everyone because IT says it is.

ALL moslems are criminals because, by their own rules, they must endorse in public every word in the Qur’an.

And the Qur’an tells them that they are so “superior” to all non-moslem humans, that it’s not only their right, but also their holy duty to their god, to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-moslems in the world, simply for the “crime” of not being moslems.

So the Qur’an is a clearly-written, us-versus-them hate-crime book, endorsing a permanent might-makes-right death-threat.

EVERY IMAGINABLE CRIME IS OFFICIALLY COMMANDED TO BE COMMITTED BY ALL MOSLEMS AGAINST ALL THE NON-MOSLEMS IN THE WORLD FOR ALLAH!

Here’s islam’s “holy Message from god” as exemplified by the collective words and deeds of it’s Founder:

“I will save humanity by lying to, extorting, torturing, robbing, burning out of their homes, kidnapping and ransoming, enslaving, raping and murdering everyone who even only verbally disagrees with me – and you can, too!”

-Muhammad-

Muhammad was really only a con-man and bandit-king, an arch-criminal who always blamed “god” for his own penchant for committing crimes. If Moe got away with committing a crime (and he tried them all, enthusiastically, more than once, but instead of ever showing contrition, bragged about how much fun it was to commit them, and advised everyone else to join in the fun, too), then it was held to be “obvious” that “god” wanted him to get away with having committed those crimes!

Sura 4:77: “Those who whined “Hold back your hands (from attacking)” were corrected:
“War is compulsory for us – the good and bad both come from allah!”

As Muhammad himself put it, “I have been made victorious through terror” (Bukhari 4.52.220).

So, islam is not a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) nor is it a “race” (at all, much less one of “Poor, Oppressed, People Of Colour”)!

Obviously, islam is ONLY an ancient, ongoing extortion-racket CRIME-syndicate, and the only “religious” part in it, is where they say:

“God told us to commit these crimes!”

(Capisce?)!

;-)

BAN ISLAM – because everything moslems pretend to consider “holy” is already a crime!

;-(

Meet Britains’ next – and last – Prime Minister: Lord Muhammad Windsor

April 17, 2013

Image

…the way things have been going there lately…

My point is, there’s a running joke that, if Hitler had only thought to describe National Socialism as a “religion” he’d have won, because the USA’s silly First Amendment guarantees would have protected him if he had opened up nazi garrisons in North America described as “churches” or “community centers” there.

Hence today, especially in Submissive Britain, all he’d have to do to take over completely there would be to change his name to Muhammad.

Adolf and Moe shared the same birthday; Adolf has been quoted more than once and from more than one source, in different settings, stating he wished he’d been born a righteously violent moslem in stead of as a weak, insipid Christian, and that islam was the only religion he respected.

Upon meeting with Haj-Amin al-Husseini, (Arafat’s uncle) the Grand Mufti of ‘Palestine,’ Adolf re-wrote his racist screed to include the Arabs as part of his Master Race ideology (Hajji was blond and had blue eyes, which prompted Adolf to not only surmise the Arabs were descended from Romans, but also to more fully embrace islam himself).

Adolf actually copied the idea of the yellow armbands with the Magen Davids on them from the moslems. The yellow sashes and armbands were of Turkish origin, I believe, with which to better identify and humiliate the Jews into paying the jizya extortion or protection tax.
Christians got blue ones back then.

Adolf then empowered Hajji to form his own corps of moslem elite SS troopers, the Handschar Division, which he then inflicted on the Balkans, where they genocided the Christian Serbs out of their own heartland of Kosovo, and replaced them with thousands of much more nazi compatible moslems from nearby Albania (which had itself had it’s own ethnic population genocided out of existence during the last 500 years by, of course, the Turks).

Hajji is also “credited” with hounding Adolf into speeding up his genocidal oven-building plans for the Jews, directly influencing the creation and implementation of the Final Solution first in Europe, and then, it was planned, for use in ‘Palestine’ itself, back in the Middle East.

Mein Kampf reads remarkably similarly to the Qur’an (except with LESS Jew-hatred)!

Adolf was probably Moe reincarnated.

;-(

The Windsor bit was a dig at Dhimmi Prince Charlie, whose own words and actions defending islam have made many many people speculate that he – as putative head of the Anglican Church – has not-so secretly himself already converted to islam.

Ontario’s Judicial appointments vetted by moslem criminal

April 5, 2013

Just found out the other day that the moslems are actually and officially in charge of appointing the judges in Canada’s largest province, Ontario: the judicial appointments committee – the Judicial Advisory Appointments Committee, or JAAC (as in “They don’t know JAAC”) is chaired by one Hanny HASSAN. Unbelievable – the head of the holy mobster moslem mafia is in charge of vetting all the appointed judges here, too! Whee!

holy mobster now running the judicial asylum

holy mobster now running the judicial asylum

That’s EXACTLY like having the Mafia appoint our Judges, except that the Mafia was never so bold as to try to use

“God told us to commit these crimes! Capisce?!” as it’s official alibi!

The idolatrous group-rights Liberal/Moslem victimology salesmen’s love-affair continues:

Here’s the links:

http://www.canada.com/news/Outgoing+premier+sneaks+appointments/8130555/story.html

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/national/Ontario+Court+appointments+show+former+Ontario+premier/8128692/story.html

AND, most damning (because it proves he isn’t just some non-practising guy who just happens to have been born into a moslem family, but is instead a self-determined taqiyya dawa propagandist, deliberately trying to defraud the Canadian public concerning his international crime-gang’s intent):

http://www.ontariocourts.ca/ocj/jaac/members/

Hanny HASSAN presently serves on the Board of Governors and Senate of the University of Western Ontario. He is a member of the National Executive and Vice Chair of the Ontario Panel of the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council. He is the Past Co-Chair of the National Muslim Christian Liaison Committee. He served as the President of the Ontario Advisory Council on Multiculturalism and Citizenship, from 1991 to 1995. He has been, for many years, a member of the advisory committee of OMNI Television. In December 2010, Mr. Hassan was named a Member of the Order of Canada by the Governor General of Canada for his long-time volunteer work in promoting understanding between cultures and religions.

Now – yippee skippee –  he’s in charge of vetting our judicial appointments. Thanks, again,  outgoing premier Dolton McGuilty!

As for multiculturalism citizenship: moslems have absolutely NO loyalty to any sovereign national governments nor man-made countries, which they regard as temporary false idols, to be eventually destroyed and replaced by the one-world global moslem ummah, to be ruled by their theocratic caliphate government. After all, since Sharia law is based directly on allah’s perfect, immutable Word in the Qur’an, why would anyone need any human governments – even duly elected ones, a la the Arab spring, to make any laws contrary to it? That would be blasphemy!

OH, Canada!!!

;-(

Ottawa Citizen edits ammo shortage story to mislead public

April 5, 2013

Today’s Ottawa Citizen (Friday, April 5, 2013, P.#C5) carried an AP story by Salon contributor Michael Vertanen which was deliberately edited to become unfair and unbalanced, slanting it so it appeared that recent US ammo shortages were only caused by hordes of paranoid “bitter clingers” (right-wing patriots) while lying to the public by ridiculing the truth that the massive hoarding buyouts of the Obama regime was behind it all.

Here’s the full story, with the parts the Citizen chose not to let the public see, in bold:

Laws, rumors have ammo flying off (U.S.) store shelves

— Apr. 5 11:49 AM EDT
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Gun enthusiasts fearful of new weapon controls and alarmed by rumors of government hoarding are buying bullets practically by the bushel, making it hard for stores nationwide to keep shelves stocked and even putting a pinch on some local law enforcement departments.At a 24-hour Walmart in suburban Albany, the ammunition cabinet was three-fourths empty this week; sales clerks said customers must arrive before 9 the morning after a delivery to get what they want. A few miles away, Dick’s Sporting Goods puts up a red rope after ammunition deliveries so buyers can line up early to get a number, averting races up the escalator to the gun counter. Both stores are limiting ammunition purchases to three boxes a day.In mid-January, two days after New York became the first state to toughen laws post-Newtown, hunter and target shooter Mark Smith spent $250 to stockpile ammunition, including $43 for a brick of 500 .22-caliber bullets, commonly used for target shooting and hunting small game.

“I had a feeling there was going to be a huge ammunition shortage,” said Smith, browsing shotgun shells this week at Dick’s. “Especially .22s. It’s probably the most popular round out there.”

Likewise, the .223 ammunition used in popular semi-automatic rifles is hard to find.

At Hunter’s Haven, a strip-mall gun shop in the farming community of Rolesville, N.C., north of Raleigh, clerk Dean Turnage said ammunition is going out “as fast as we can get it in,” even though new gun controls are not on the state’s agenda.

The run started in November with President Barack Obama’s re-election, followed by the mass shooting in December of children in Newtown, Conn., which led the president to launch an effort to strengthen federal gun controls and several states to tighten their laws.

Connecticut on Thursday became the latest to crack down as the governor signed a measure — effective immediately — that adds more than 100 firearms to the state’s assault weapons ban, creates a dangerous weapon offender registry and institutes eligibility rules for ammunition purchases.

Hours before the law took effect, hundreds of customers streamed out of Hoffman’s Gun Center in Newington with guns and boxes of ammunition.

“The bad guys are going to get guns,” said John Power, 56, of Bristol, arguing the new law would not stop a troubled gunman.

The nation’s 100 million firearms owners are driving the market for some 10 billion rounds annually, with demand and gun purchases both increasing the past several months, driven partly by fear that tougher laws will restrict the ability to buy firearms, said Lawrence Keane, whose National Shooting Sports Foundation is based in Newtown.

“There’s a concern by firearms owners that this administration will pursue bans on products, bans on ammunition. … It’s not limited geographically to New York or anywhere else. It is nationwide,” he said.

Some government critics attributed shortages to federal purchases of bullets, accusing officials of trying to hoard a billion rounds and disarm the populace.

“Department of Homeland Security and the federal government itself is buying up ammunition and components at such a rate, it’s causing artificial shortage of supplies for the regular consumer,” said Jesse Alday, a state corrections officer who was buying a couple of boxes of primers at Hunter’s Haven.

“They’re buying it up as fast as they can, for reasons they’re not officially willing to admit or go into. … They’re not willing to come up with any answers as to the reasons behind why they have enough ammunition on the U.S., on our own home soil, to wage a 25-year war,” he said. “That’s kind of strange.”

Keane, whose group includes manufacturers, said the reports of massive federal purchases were not true.

…….

(The Ottawa Citizen srtory ends right there! Here’s the rest of it:)

The government routinely buys products in bulk to reduce costs, and Homeland Security has said the latest purchases are no different.

Last year, the department put out bids for a total of about 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition over the next five years. The rounds are to be used for training, routine weapons qualification exercises and normal duty by various department agencies.

On a smaller scale, some local law enforcement agencies are also having problems getting ammo.

Jennifer Donnals, a spokeswoman for the Tennessee Highway Patrol, said the agency was still waiting on rifle and shotgun ammunition ordered in November.

In Phoenix, the Police Department has stopped providing officers with 100 rounds of ammunition per month for practice. Sgt. Trent Crump said 10 to 15 percent of the department’s 3,000 officers, who are assigned .40-caliber and .45-caliber handguns, had taken advantage of the ammunition for practice shooting.

In January, police chiefs in central Texas said they were having trouble arming their officers because of shortages of assault rifles and ammunition.

The major U.S. manufacturers are running shifts around the clock to try to meet increased demand, Keane said. The foundation projected $1.5 billion from ammunition sales in 2011 and $2.8 billion from gun sales, totals that more than doubled in a decade.

Stockpiling has also been fueled by false online rumors, such as one that purports a coming nickel tax on each bullet, which would triple the cost of a .22-caliber cartridge, said Hans Farnung, president of Beikirch’s Ammunition, a retailer and wholesaler in Rochester, N.Y., that sells in seven states.

“I don’t want to call them doomsdayers, but people get on these blogs on the Internet and they drive people’s fears,” he said. “They do not want to wait around and see.”

The tax rumor was fueled by proposals in Connecticut, California and Illinois that haven’t advanced.

This isn’t the first U.S. run on ammunition. Walmart’s Kory Lundberg said the retail chain previously rationed in 2009, the year Obama entered the White House. However, sportsmen and tradesmen say the current shortages are nationwide, and the worst they’ve seen.

New York’s law will require ammunition sellers to register and buyers to undergo a background check starting Jan. 15, 2014. Richard Aborn, president of the Citizens Crime Commission of New York City, said the run on guns and ammunition isn’t surprising and is fueled by “gross exaggerations,” when reasonable discussion is what’s needed.

“This is legitimate gun owners buying,” he said. “I don’t think criminals are stockpiling.”

Bruce Martindale, a champion marksman from upstate New York who normally uses .22-caliber rimfire ammunition, said it’s now hard for him to get anything, partly because online retailers are reluctant to ship to New York and risk running afoul of its new law.

Like many competitors, he has cut back on practice. “I can’t buy supplies anywhere,” he said.