Archive for December, 2013


December 31, 2013


by William Dorich on December 30, 2013


in Barack Hussein Obama, William Dorich (team member)

From the Internet…

Think about this e-mail and see if there’s anything here you don’t believe!

I hadn’t thought about this – but where are Obama’s past girlfriends Surely he had at least one? No past girl friends popping up anywhere? Strange – strange to the point of being downright weird! Are the rumors that he might be gay true?

OK, this is just plain old common sense, no political agendas for either side. Just common knowledge for citizens of a country, especially American citizens, who know every little tidbit about every other president (and their wives) that even know that Andrew Jackson’s wife smoked a corn cob pipe and was accused of adultery, or that Lincoln never went to school or Kennedy wore a back brace, or Truman played the piano.

We are Americans! Our media vets these things out! We are known for our humanitarian interests and caring for our ‘fellow man.’ We care, but none of us know one single humanizing fact about the history of our own president.

Honestly, and this is a personal thing… But it’s bugged me for years that no one who ever dated him ever showed up. Taken his charisma, which caused the women to be drawn to him so obviously during his campaign, looks like some lady would not have missed the opportunity.

We all know about JFK’s magnetism, McCain was no monk, Palin’s courtship and even her athletic prowess were probed. Biden’s aneurisms are no secret. Look at Cheney and Clinton-we all know about their heart problems. How could I have left out Wild Bill before or during the White House?

Nope… Not one lady has stepped up and said, “He was soooo shy,” or “What a great dancer!” Now look at the rest of what we know… No classmates, not even the recorder for the Columbia class notes ever heard of him.

Who was the best man at his wedding? Start there. Check for groomsmen. Then get the footage of the graduation ceremony.

Has anyone talked to the professors? Isn’t it odd that no one is bragging that they knew him or taught him or lived with him.

When did he meet Michele and how? Are there photos? Every president provides the public with all their photos, etc. For their library. What has he released? Nada – other than what was in this so-called biography! And experts who study writing styles, etc. claim it was not O’s own words or typical of his speech patterns, etc.

Does this make any of you wonder?

Ever wonder why no one ever came forward from Obama’s past, saying they knew him, attended school with him, was his friend, etc? Not one person has ever come forward from his past.

This should really be a cause for great concern. Did you see the movie titled, The Manchurian Candidate?

Let’s face it. As insignificant as we all are.. Someone whom we went to school with remembers our name or face… Someone remembers we were the clown or the dork or the brain or the quiet one or the bully or something about us.

George Stephanopoulos, ABC News said the same thing during the 2008 campaign. Even George questions why no one has acknowledged that the president was in their classroom or ate in the same cafeteria or made impromptu speeches on campus. Stephanopoulos was a classmate of Obama at Columbia-class of 1984. He says he never had a single class with him. Since he is such a great orator, why doesn’t anyone in Obama’s college class remember him? And, why won’t he allow Columbia to release his records? Do you like millions of others, simply assume all this is explainable – even though no one can?


Looking for evidence of Obama’s past, Fox News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period when Obama claims to have been there, but not one remembers him. For example, Wayne Allyn Root was (like Obama) a political science major at Columbia , who graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root says of Obama, “I don’t know a single person at Columbia that knew him, and they all know me. I don’t have a single classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia .. EVER!

Nobody recalls him.

Root adds that he was, “Class of ’83 political science, pre-law” and says, “You don’t get more exact or closer than that.. Never met him in my life, don’t know anyone who ever met him.”

At our 20th class reunion five years ago, who was asked to be the speaker of the class? Me. No one ever heard of Barack! And five years ago, nobody even knew who he was. The guy who writes the class notes, who’s kind of the, as we say in New York , ‘the macha’ who knows everybody, has yet to find a person, a human who ever met him.”

Obama’s photograph does not appear in the school’s yearbook, and Obama consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia , provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates or friends while at Columbia ..

How can this be?

NOTE: Wayne Allyn Root can easily be verified. He graduated valedictorian from his high school, Thornton-Donovan School , then graduated from Columbia University in 1983 as a Political Science major in the same ’83 class in which Barack Hussein Obama states he was.

Some other interesting questions.

Why was Obama’s law license inactivated in 2002?

Why was Michelle’s law license inactivated by court order?

According to the U.S. Census, there is only one Barack Obama – but 27 Social Security numbers and over 80 aliases.


The Social Security number he uses now originated in Connecticut where he is never reported to have lived.

No wonder all his records are sealed!

Please continue sending this out to everyone. Somewhere, someone had to know him in school… before he “reorganized” Chicago and burst upon the scene at the 2004 Democratic Convention and made us swoon with his charm, poise, and speaking pizzazz.


One of the biggest CONS this country has ever seen, and getting away with it. This is scary on many levels.

Are Catholics Really Muslims?

December 27, 2013

Every year at family gatherings, I learn more about the liberal ‘mind’ from my “progressive” relatives … especially from the one who, like the new Pope, is a progressive liberal Catholic himself.


One of their favorite tropes, (and of course backwards, idolatrous alibi-excuses to do nothing) it seems, is that “Since Christianity worked out all its sectarian differences, and the muslims are a few (!!!) centuries behind us, all we have to do is to wait for them to sort themselves out, too! Whee!”

As if islam will become all peaceful (because weren’t Jesus and the early disciples also once all bloodthirsty warlords, too?) on its own, once it has its “protestant” reformation and the Sunnis and Shiites reunite at last (thus presumably leaving them with only all the world’s infidels to concentrate their collective enmity upon)!

At the base of this vapid idiocy is, of course, liberal racism – as if all Arabs are muslims, and vice-versa; as if Arabia were some sort of isolated cultural region in which islam just organically grew as a diversely equal culture all on its own, and, as such, has the inherent right to exist and to in fact overcome and destroy our culture, if it proves to be ‘superior’ to ours (because they can and intend to out-breed us with their multiple wives = multiple warriors every year, strategy, for instance)!

(And at this point in the conversation, my Catholic and gay relatives all high-fived each other in unseemly eager anticipation of the demise of our culture at the bloody hands of the superior islamic one – I kid you not, this actually happened)! I had to remind them that islam was only a crime-gang whose ‘muslim’ members always blamed a version of “god” for their own criminal desires.

So, to sum up: I think he meant that, if the Western Catholics hadn’t had a Protestant movement, then we’d all have regressed to islamic, muslim-like barbarity as some part of our “natural cultural evolution,” too.

Which to my mind, means my Catholic relative’s relativism has equated himself, by means of his circuitous tautological reasoning-avoidance process, aka the slanderously victim-blaming argumentum tu quoque critical thinking logical fallacy [“islam isn’t evil because we (i.e: you) all do it, too! Whee!”] with any given muslim on the planet.

And besides (he continued) since most muslims (especially if they’re non-Arabic muslims, which he can concede might exist) allegedly don’t know about their islamic world-conquest imperative, then it doesn’t really exist at all anyway, so why worry about it? It’s not like he has a duty or intention to defend anyone else, much less even himself or his own children, from others’ only hypothetical threats; that’s what he defers his responsibilities to think for him self by paying all his equally fact-averse, liberally progressive politicians for, isn’t it?!

And yet, back here in objective reality, one might be so rude as to remind the family liberal (who happens to be Catholic himself, in my particular familial case) that Arabia itself was full of Christian and Jewish Arabs (and many “diverse” pagans, of course) who all sorta mostly got along with each other along religious lines, if not on tribal ones, before the advent of Muhammad the bandit-king in the 7th century, who rapidly caused at least half of Arabia to be genocided during both his own conquests and immediately after his own death during the resulting Riddah (apostacy) Wars.

So islam didn’t grow organically as a natural “Arabic cultural choice” at all – it was imposed by brutal, violent force of terror on an unwilling populace by extortionist criminal gangsters!

And the Arabs aren’t reclusive desert nomads, quaintly ignorant of all the historical ins-and-outs of Jewish and Christian reform movements – in fact, the Arabs witnessed most of it before being forced into islam, as they WERE all Jewish and Christians back then!

So the Arab muslims were well-aware of all the tenets of both Judaism and Christianity, and consciously rejected their reforms in favour of barbarism!

They aren’t just innocently benighted savages, stumbling around like amusing children whom we should allow to find out the various but objectively universal truths to be discovered, as part of their own natural evolution on their own. Far be it from us to tell them they’re only criminals! Who are we hateful racists to judge their presumably ‘racially’ inferior cultures, as inferior? Perish the (liberal cultural) thought, along with our hatefully superior, bigoted racist culture, if need be!

And so I must, however forcibly, interject: NO, Dear Catholic (and ‘Gay’) Liberals, it’s NOT the “perfectly natural right” of criminal islam to conquer us, too!

“Whee” indeed.


Measures To Eliminate International Terrorism

December 22, 2013

Measures to eliminate international terrorism


A/RES/68/119, passed by the United Nations General Assembly  December 16, 2013 without a vote.

After reaffirming a slew of prior resolutions and insincere condemnations of terrorism, the last paragraph on page 2 offers an obtuse and opaque hint at the root of the problem, conflicting with those previous resolutions.. [Emphasis added.]


Reaffirming also that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group,

Reaffirming that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group,
Emphasizing that tolerance and dialogue among civilizations and the enhancement of interfaith and intercultural understanding are among the most important elements in promoting cooperation and success in combating terrorism, and welcoming the various initiatives to this end,

That declaration is a prime example of Political Correctness: “A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”[Wikiquote]

Turds do not have clean ends and terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam.

    • civilization
    • religion
  • Dialogue among civilizations and understanding:
    • interfaith
    • intercultural
  • Most important elements in combating terrorism.

When we put the critical elements of the two paragraphs together for comparison, cognitive dissonance is clearly recognizable. If there is no causal relationship between religion and terrorism, how can interfaith understanding combat terrorism?


Allah said that he would “cast terror“. Allah cast terror, plundering Jewish settlements.  Allah told Moe that he terrified
the Jews more than Allah did.  Moe said that he was made victorious by terror.

Allah commanded Muslims to treat defeated victims harshly to terrorize those to be attacked next.  Allah commanded Muslims to maximize their military strength to terrify prospective victims.


Brig. S.K. Malik wrote The Qur’anic Concept of War as a training manual for the army of Pakistan.  His analysis will help you to comprehend their strategy. Terror is both a means and an end.
This paragraph comes from the bottom of page 59. [Emphasis added.]

Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only a means, it is the end in itself. Once

a condition of terror into the opponent’s heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be
achieved. It is the point where the means and the end meet and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

That is what they say when they sacrifice hadi at Eid. It is also what they said when they slit the throats of the flight crews.  Yes, they sacrificed the flight crews to Satan, but there is more, as Mohammed Atta commanded the hijackers in his final instructions.

Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers. God said: ‘Strike above the neck, and strike at all of their extremities.’ Know that the gardens of paradise are waiting for you in all their beauty, and the women of paradise are waiting, calling out, ‘Come hither, friend of God.’ They have dressed in their most beautiful clothing.

He told them to shout the Takbir because it strikes fear. He cited 8.12 in which Allah promised to cast terror. He alluded to the whores of Allah’s celestial bordello which are promised to those who fight in his cause, killing and being killed and the
upgrade available to those who take any step to enrage or injure disbelievers. .

terrorize you

Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and his four co-conspirators had a few things to say about terrorism in their Response To The Nine Accusations.

So, if our act of Jihad and our fighting with you caused fear and terror, then many thanks to God, because it is him that has thrown fear into your hearts, which resulted in your infidelity, paganism, and your statement that God had a son and your trinity beliefs.

Why are those vermin still alive and eating on our dime?

So, our religion is a religion of fear and terror to the enemies of God: the Jews,Christians, and pagans.With God’s wiling, we are terrorists to the bone. So, many thanks toGod.

The Arab poet, Abu-Ubaydah AI-Hadrami, has stated: ((We will terrorize you, as long as we live with swords, fire, and airplanes.))

Why are those vermin not burning in Hell?

We ask to be near to God, we fight you and destroy you and terrorize you. The Jihad in god’s cause is a great duty in our religion. We have news for you, the news is: You will be greatly defeated in Afghanistan and Iraq and that America will fall, politically, militarily, and economically. Your end is verynear and your fall will be just as the fall of the towers on the blessed 9/11 day. We will raise from the ruins, God willing. We will leave this imprisonment with our noses raised high in dignity, as the lion emerges from his den. We shall pass over the blades of the sword into the gates of heaven.

So we ask from God to accept our contributions to the great attack, the great attack on America, and to place our nineteen martyred brethren among the highest peaks in paradise. God is great and pride for God, the prophet, and the believers.

Why are Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan & Saudi Arabia still polluting the face of the earth and infesting the world with vermin?

Why did Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Shrub & Obama mislead the nation, lie to us about the identity and character of the enemy and obfuscate the breadth, depth and intensity of the existential threat it poses to Liberty?

Why does the United Nations commit treason against the human race by obfuscating the source of genocidal, terrorist Jihad?  If they sincerely wanted to combat international terrorism, they would take measures to eradicate Islam from the face of the earth. They would seek means of causing mass apostasy among the Ummah al-Islamiyya.  Instead they seek to shield Islam from exposure; to shield it  by criminalizing all questioning and criticism of its damnable doctrines and practices.

This video illustrates the basics of Jihad, it is a clue for you.

This longer video demonstrates the deceptions of  Blair, Cameron, Obamination & Shrub.

While it conflates hadith with Qur’an, it is conceptually accurate.

Citizens of the USA can use this on line petition to inform their Congressmen and Senators of Islam’s egregious violations
of international human rights conventions and demand their enforcement which requires that Islam be proscribed by law for promoting war and genocide. When you sign it, it will email itself to Congress.

Europeans can not sign the petition, they should email a link to their MP & MEP instead.

Liberalism Is Crime, by definition!

December 21, 2013

These days, “Liberals” are only Fascists – totalitarian conformist extortionist criminals – who, like all the other varieties of tribal leftists, pretend to worship group-might-makes-rights, while all true right wingers still only stand for individual self-reliant responsibility and universal individual human rights.

It’s almost a chicken versus egg philosophical difference – do groups (of individuals) “create” (and so, own) all individuals, as their subordinates, or are individuals only to enjoy the protections of rights, because all groups or extortionist gangs (of individuals) are still really only individuals, who should not be afforded might-made rights?

Obviously, if groups have rights, then all individuals don’t, because all non-members of the mightiest groups are automatically discriminated against and so have less rights.

It’s those very same “Classical liberal” Enlightenment values or self-reliant responsibility and individual human rights, that today’s Conservatives are trying to “conserve,” while the libertine “liberal” criminals revel in their notion of “progressively” looking ever “forward” to having no rules nor laws left at all to constrain only them selves. As with the old feudalist system, today’s liberals engage in group- might-makes-right extortion, claiming – as all criminals always do – to have rights without the corollary responsibilities to earn them; in fact, they want the right to remain irresponsibly wrong, while imposing on everyone else the
responsibility to become right (as in factually correct).

So all lefties (communazis, muslims) are really only total(“itarian”) conformists: extortionist group-might-makes-right collectivists; slanderously victim-blaming gangsters; criminals.

Both muslim and liberal idolaters love having predeterministic excuses to deflect from their own crimes: that there is no real evil, crime, nor criminals, because we’re really all only helpless victims – liberals say, of society, products of our environments, and muslims all claim to be helpless slaves of allah. They collect excuses like clipping coupons, so of course they’re interested in each other. Come to think of it, they are also both forms of infantile delinquency and criminally-negligent masochism, pre-emptively inflicting despair and failure, so as to be able to pretend to “control” it all; i.e: “Screw you – I MEANT TO DO THAT! Whee!”

They’re also both gangs of group-might-makes-right worshipping, “defensively” victim-slandering gangsters!

When they commit a crime, they claim (at most) it was a mistake, but not really “because we (i.e: you) all do it, too!” And when they make a mistake, they themselves usually turn it from mere negligence, into a case of criminal negligence, when they claim they had intended to do it in the first place (thus declaring their own criminal intent from the beginning which, even if it’s a pre-posterous lie, still proves they’re criminals anyway, because lying/fraud is still the most basic form of theft – it’s the theft of the Truth – and all crimes are forms of theft)!

Liberals (and all other criminals) don’t ever really think, situationally – because if they did, they wouldn’t be criminals – they only ever react and attack, because they had long since before now slanderously and “pre-emptively” decided at some point in their lives that everyone was out to get them. So they constructed a simple and ritualistic cookie-cutter like behavioural response pattern to fit all future occasions. And since their message always only amounts to declarations of pure, selfish evil, their pre-programmed, fear-based and almost instinctively reactionary tactics must by necessity always involve messenger-shooting, victim-blaming slander.

Once you’ve been proven factually wrong in public, you can no longer prove yourself right, so there’s only two possible responses left to you: admit it and thank your educator for enlightening you, or evasively try blustering to deflect attention from your mistakes, by distracting people with irrelevant examples of your accuser’s own mistakes, to attempt to “prove” them to be wrong, “too!” i.e: Blame your victims!

This is where people turn mistakes from mere negligence into criminal negligence, more or less by slanderously asserting: “Screw you! I meant to do that, because I knew you were gonna make me do it, so it’s all your fault! Whee!” Then they follow up with “There are no real crimes, because we all do it, too – even you make mistakes!” This is immoral relativism and the false, victim-blaming ’emotion’ of subjective “jealousy!”

Since they automatically pretend that everything’s relative, there is no real right or wrong, that it’s an absolute fact that there are absolutely no absolute facts, and that, since there’s no real cause and effect (or it’s too complex for any of us mere mortals to ever truly fully discover or understand) then all facts are only opinions, so therefore all the liberals’ entirely fact-free opinions are in reality the diversely opposite equals of the “conservatives'” silly objective facts!

They also thus often prefer to focus on WHO said something, rather than on WHAT was actually said.

So, never having any facts which would ever agree with their perpetual irrationality, the left must always resort to the slanderous evasions known collectively as the critical thinking logical fallacies – the deflective ad-hominem personal attacks, the distractive strawman red-herrings, and of course the immoral relativist’s favorite slander, the argumentum tu quoque – i.e: “Crime isn’t crime, and islam isn’t evil, because we all (i.e: you) do it too! Whee!” As if simply comparing many different categories of wrong, somehow made one of them into a right!

Isn’t it funny that people who actually have facts, rarely (if ever) seem to feel the need to indulge in fallacies?.

Main symptoms of ‘liberalism’ (criminality):

adversarial subjectivity and double-standards.

1. Suspend cause & effect, &:
2. argumentum tu quoque: blame others in order to dilute self-responsibility.

(Either there was no cause and effect to be avoided, or it’s your fault/not mine because we all do it, too)!

They want rights without responsibilities for only them selves, which means they must slanderously blame everyone else and assert that only everyone else has responsibilities towards them, and also therefore no rights to defend themselves from the liberals’ slanders; they have no rights at all to self-defense.

So liberals’ actions will always be pre-forgiven by use of the ‘passive voice’ grammatical tense – by removing cause and effect, everything is a tragedy which “just happens;” an act of God, all ascribed to pre-determinism; they are helpless victims of society, products of their environments, and slaves of allah.

Because of their eternally pre-emptively adversarial, ritualistic and idolatrous stance, they are unfit to govern even their own lives, much less others: they will automatically see any and all problems they are faced with, as unavoidable and predetermined forces of nature or acts of God which cannot be avoided, much less conquered – every problem, crime, or perversion presented to them for which they can be held accountable or responsible, they will seek to automatically compromise with and/or Submit to, preferably while blaming others for daring to suggest they had any other choice but to do so.

They are idolaters, always selling symptoms to avoid causes, and slanderously paranoid: always on the lookout for others’ outrages and crimes to defend themselves from or compare themselves to (argumentum tu quoque) to dilute their own even only potential culpability with. Those who are good at making excuses, are seldom good for anything else, as Ben Franklin once noticed. They will always secretly scheme to seek to selfishly, pre-emptively “defend” them selves, rather than ever risk beeing wrong in an effort to collaboratively cooperate with others in a symbiotic effort to come to understand an objective truth and thereby fix a mistake or solve a problem.

They will thus also by default automatically always end up exploiting unsolved problems by leaving them unsolved (thus committing criminal negligence), and act as solutions in search of problems, wanting and agitating to fix what’s not broken. They thus fail upwards and often get promoted for ruining everything. Their motto must be:

“There’s No Money In Solutions!”

Since children do have rights to be supported without responsibilities, liberal criminals will act like contentiously spoiled children in order to emotively induce their opponents into giving them concessions. They are criminally negligent adults, but play the victims, only acting like infantile delinquents in order to get away with committing their crimes.

Liberalism is CRIME, not a mental disease.

Calling it a ‘disease’ only gives those criminals who commit the crime of liberalism (i.e: these libertines who, like all criminals, only ever really want rights – like, to your stuff – without responsibilities – like, for having to earn or otherwise pay for it) an excuse!

Same with any and all ‘mental illness’ excuses – if it’s not some real, physical, and therefore ‘neurological’ (hardware) problems, then it’s the software, and that involves free-will mens-rea (criminal intent) choice.

But saying their crimes are the results of diseases, only gives them the alibi to say:

“I didn’t do it – ONLY my BRAIN did it! Whee!”




PS: From here:


  • Re: “In psychology, projection is just one of many defense mechanisms people unconsciously employ to avoid facing uncomfortable feelings within themselves – by ascribing these unpleasant qualities to another person.” All psycho-paths (a Greek word which means “thought-killers”) choose to experience all emotions – even the “poignantly” pointy ones such as pity and sadness – as pain. So they also choose to experience their own, internally generated helpful fears (of potential damage-causing pains) AS externally inflicted pains themselves, to be ignored, avoided, or even “counter”-attacked. Seeking then to “control” their painful fears BY causing the actual damage-causing mistakes and problems which cause the pains, in order to cancel and avoid the secondary pains of having to think about (fear) those pains, is why all masochists are psychopaths, and vice-versa. Naturally, this natural paranoia is also covered up by victim-blaming, “projective” hypocrisy. And as we all know, all hypocrites are criminals, and all criminals are hypocrites!


  • Seeing one’s temporary, dynamic emotions as static, permanent idols to be feared and worshiped used to be called “idolaltry.” Idols, of course -whether rocks or statues or unreal ideas and lying metaphors – are merely facades behind which criminals hide. Today’s followers of the Left-Hand Path pretend their own emotions are causes, not merely effects, and worship them as morality itself. It’s known to today’s high priest of paganism as “mental illness” (a great “inevitable force” alibi to excuse their own criminal desires and actions: “I didn’t do it! My brain made me do it! And in fact, I didn’t do it at all! Only my brain did it! Whee!”) Paranoia (the idol of permanent fear) Masochism (the idol of permanent greed – self-inflicted damage blamed on others for personal gain) and hypocrisy (the permanently false hope that one’s greed won’t be exposed, by slandering one’s victims) are the most routinely used idols of today’s cowardly gangster leftopaths.


Dhimmi Prince Charlie finally notices islamic evil – sorta

December 19, 2013

Christianity at risk in Middle East, warns Prince Charles

‘Deeply troubled’ by threat fundamentalist Islamist militants pose

by John Bingham

Ottawa Citizen Wednesday, December 18, 2013. P.# A1, A2.

Originally, from here:

Christianity beginning ‘to disappear’ in its birthplace, warns Prince of Wales

Prince of Wales delivers impassioned personal plea for Christians in the Middle East, warning ‘organised persecution’ by Islamist fundamentalists could sever 2,000-year link

By , Religious Affairs Editor

10:00PM GMT 17 Dec 2013

Christianity is beginning “to disappear” in its own birthplace after 2,000 years because of a wave of “organised persecution” across the Middle East, the Prince of Wales has warned (Prince Charles warned Tuesday).

In an impassioned intervention, he said that the world is in danger of losing something “irreplaceably precious” with communities that trace their history back to Jesus’ time now under threat from fundamentalist Islamist militants. (Shouldn’t that be “militantists!”)?

Speaking openly of his own Christian faith, he said he had become “deeply troubled” by the plight of those he described as his “brothers and sisters in Christ”.

Prince Charles accompanied by Prince Ghazi bin Mohammad of Jordan (2nd right) during the visit, celebrating Christian communities from the Middle-East in Britain. Photo: AFP/Getty Images

And the Prince, a long-standing advocate of dialogue between religions, voiced personal dismay at seeing his work over the last 20 years to “build bridges and dispel ignorance” being deliberately destroyed by those attempting to exploit the Arab Spring for their own ends.

He devoted a Christmas reception for religious leaders at Clarence House, his official London residence, to draw attention to the threat Christians have come under in recent months across Egypt, Syria, Iraq and other parts of the region.

In a calculated display of unity, he delivered his comments flanked by Prince Ghazi of Jordan and joined by the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Most Rev Justin Welby, the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Westminster, the Most Rev Vincent Nichols and the Chief Rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis.


It came at the end of a day in which he heard vivid personal testimony from Middle Eastern Christians who have fled to the UK as he visited the London cathedral of the Syriac Orthodox Church and the Coptic Orthodox Church centre in Stevenage, Herts.

Clerics spoke of a new era of “martyrs” as one Syrian man clasped his hands together pleading with the Prince for help. Another showed him mobile phone pictures of the destruction in his own village.

In his address the Prince urged Christians, Muslims and Jews to unite in “outrage” as he warned that the elimination of Christianity in much of the region in which it developed would be a “major blow to peace”.

“I have for some time now been deeply troubled by the growing difficulties faced by Christian communities in various parts of the Middle East,” he said.

“It seems to me that we cannot ignore the fact that Christians in the Middle East are increasingly being deliberately targeted by fundamentalist Islamist militants.”

In a reference to the Christmas story, he added: “Christianity was literally born in the Middle East and we must not forget our Middle Eastern brothers and sisters in Christ.

“Their church communities link us straight back to the early church as I was reminded by hearing Aramaic, our Lord’s own language spoken and sung just a few hours ago.

“Yet today the Middle East and North Africa has the lowest concentration of Christians in the world – just four per cent of the population and it is clear that the Christian population has dropped dramatically over the last century and is falling still further.

“This has an effect on all of us, although of course primarily on those Christians who can no longer continue to live in the Middle East.

“We all lose something immensely and irreplaceably precious when such a rich tradition dating back 2,000 years begins to disappear.”

Speaking personally, he added: “For 20 years I have tried to build bridges between Islam and Christianity and to dispel ignorance and misunderstanding.


“The point though surely is that we have now reached a crisis where the bridges are rapidly being deliberately destroyed by those with a vested interest in doing so.

“This is achieved through intimidation, false accusation and organised persecution including upon Christian communities in the Middle East at the present time.”

Prince Ghazi emphasised the importance of Christianity to the Arab world.

“Christians were present in the Arab world 600 years before Muslims,” he said.

“Indeed, Arabs were perhaps the first non-Hebrew Christians in the world, and became Christians during Jesus Christ’s own lifetime.”


20 February, 2014 update:



Charlie of Arabiya Performs Saudi Sword Dance

by sheikyer mami on February 19, 2014


Prince Charles does the Al-Hokey-Pokey with the Saudi hoi polloi. (Sheik Kaputty?)

Thanks to Vlad Tepes


Charles of Arabia: Crown prince performs Saudi sword dance

65-year-old Prince Charles was in the Saudi Arabian capital Riyadh on Monday as part of his tenth tour of the country since his first visit in 1986. (Charles has never been to Israel.)

article-imgMore here.

A lot of people believe Charlie is a closet Muslim…… who likes to hang out with muselmanic killer zombies:

Muslim leader living in Britain sentenced to death by hanging for war crimes in Bangladesh


    Chowdury Mueen-Uddin, 63, found guilty of murdering nine university professors, three physicians and six journalists – including a BBC reporter

Former director of NHS Muslim Spiritual Care was a member of Islamic militia fighting against Bangladesh’s independence in December 1971

    Judge told court: ‘Justice will not be done without capital punishment’–

Read more:

        Daily Mail

December 7: Then And Now – Rearmament Versus Moral Disarmament

December 9, 2013

From here:

GrassTopsUSA Exclusive Commentary

By Don Feder
December 6, 2013

This will not be your typical Pearl Harbor Day commentary from a conservative – eternal vigilance as the price of liberty, Munich, look where appeasement gets you and all of that.

What’s really remarkable about December 7, 1941 isn’t that we got sucker-punched by the Empire of Japan but how rapidly we recovered and why.

Coming out of the worst depression in our history (in 1940, unemployment was still 17%), we fought a global war on two fronts, against the world’s strongest military powers (fueled by fanaticism and plotting war for almost a decade) and won, becoming the dominant power on the planet in the process. And we did it all in three years and eight month after Pearl Harbor.

It’s all the more remarkable when you consider how far we came in that time. In June of 1940, the U.S. Army Air Corps had 51,000 pilots. The Royal Air Force had 500,000 pilots. The Luftwaffe had a million.

In 1940, the U.S. Army was ranked 18th in the world – not just behind Germany, France, Russia, Britain, Italy and Japan, but also inferior to that of Spain, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland and the Netherlands. We could have beaten Liechtenstein – with one hand tied behind its back.

By the end of World War II, we had 16 million men in arms. Every month, thousands of aircraft, tanks and artillery pieces were rolling off assembly lines, as well as hundreds of thousands of weapons and millions of rounds of ammunition.

What accounts for our incredible recovery after the devastating blow at Pearl Harbor? How did we go on the win the Battle of Midway exactly six months later? Why did Americans rush to enlist? Newspaper headlines the day after the attack spoke of young men “flocking” to recruiting offices and the services “swamped” by applications to enlist.

What did we have then that we don’t have now?

Americans of today had their own Pearl Harbor twelve years ago – with almost the same number of dead (around 3,000). We responded by half-heartedly fighting futile wars which we announced in advance we didn’t intend to win. In 1942, did Douglas MacArthur set a timetable for withdrawal from the Pacific?

We have doggedly refused to identify the enemy (imagine Churchill announcing in 1940 that Nazism was an ideology of brotherhood and tolerance). Under Bush the Younger, we fought a war on terror while embracing its Middle Eastern roots. (Terror is a method anyway, not an ideology.) Even that’s been downgraded. Today we deal with “man-caused disasters” through “overseas contingency operations.”

In the meantime, we twice elected an anti-American who spits on our traditions, tramples the Constitution, apologizes for our greatness and facilitates our enemies’ rise to power. Obama is still smarting about the overthrow of the Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt.

In 1941, Americans were a proud, confident and resilient people. We took responsibility for our actions. We looked out for each other. Church attendance was high. Kids actually learned in school.

In his book, “December 1941: 31 days That Changed America And Saved The World,” Craig Shirley wrote that in the 1940s “a high-school diploma was a hard-earned document and those young Americans who received a diploma had language skills, writing skills, citizenship skills, geology, biology, physics, Latin, Greek and an expansive list of books to read.”

In the early ‘80s John Silber, then president of Boston University, said a high-school diploma signified that someone had been “institutionalized” for 4 years, and nothing more.

Shirley also observed: “Chivalry and good manners reigned in American culture in 1941. Men held doors for ladies. Ladies acted like ladies. Men and women abided by the rules of courtship and life. It was the American way.”

Today, wherever you look, it’s decay. We’ve gone from rearmament in 1941 to moral disarmament as the current order of the day.

In November, a 14-year-old Danvers, Massachusetts student was indicted for the rape and murder of his math teacher, reportedly using a box cutter According to the Department of Education, in the 2009-2010 school-year, there were 1,183,700 violent crimes in America’s citadels of scholarship, including murders, rapes, robberies and aggravated assault (with and without a weapon).

According to one survey, in the 1940s, the top school discipline problems were: talking, chewing gum, making noise, running in the halls, getting out of turn in line (oh no! shocking), wearing improper clothing and not putting paper in wastepaper baskets. By the mid-80s, it was drug and alcohol abuse, suicide, rape, robbery and assault. Today the public-school perp-walk includes gangs, guns, sexting, drugs and all forms of violence.

More than 40% of all births in the land-of-the-free are out-of-the-wedlock. According to a 2010 Time magazine survey, 39% believe marriage is now obsolete. More than a third of Americans think marriage is outdated, but liberalism’s cause celebre is gay marriage.

In a nation that pioneered the protection of human rights, there are one to two abortions every minute. Thanks to a low birthrate – in part fueled by a failure to form families – we won’t have the manpower to fight future wars.

By age 15, 25% of American males and 26% of females have engaged in sexual intercourse. Each year, 19 million new cases of STDs are diagnosed, half among 15 to 26 year-olds. In the United States, pornography is a $12-billion-a-year industry.

Perhaps nothing symbolizes our descent more than the so-called knockout game, where black teens attack innocent bystanders (including the elderly) and try to knock them on the ground with one punch, while one of their cheering friends tapes the assault on a cell phone.

The differences between 1941 and 2013 are best illustrated by comparison:

  • They had John Wayne, Jimmy Stewart and Henry Fonda. We have Matt Damon, Sean Penn and Jane Fonda.
  • They had John Ford and Frank Capra. We have Oliver Stone and Michael Moore.
  • They had Kate Smith singing “God Bless America.” We have Lady Gaga singing “God Bless Transsexuals.”
  • They had swing. We have rap.
  • They had Abbott and Costello and the Marx Brothers. We have Margaret Cho, Louis CK and Larry the Cable Guy.
  • They had “Gone with The Wind,” “The Wizard of Oz,” “How Green Was My Valley” and “Abe Lincoln in Illinois.” We have “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” in 3-D, “Kick-Ass 2,” “The Last Exorcism,” “Nymphomaniac,” and “Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter.”
  • They had books. We have 60-inch plasma TVs, cell phones and social media.
  • They had conversations. We Tweet.
  • They had “Remember Pearl Harbor.” We have “Islam is the religion of peace.”
  • They had “Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition,” “No atheists in the foxholes” and the Four Chaplains. We have the ACLU, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State and “America isn’t a Christian nation.”
  • They had God, family and country. We have sensitivity, multiculturalism and inclusiveness.
  • They had the 4th. of July, Thanksgiving and Christmas. We have Kwanzaa, Ramadan and Cinco de Mayo.
  • They produced tons of consumer goods. We’ve outsourced production, while generating a mountain of debt – much of it owned by our enemies.
  • They had Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig. We have a 312-lb, 6’5′ offensive lineman who quit the Miami Dolphins because he was (poor baby!) harassed by a teammate, or so he says.
  • They had Winston Churchill, FDR, MacArthur, Ike and Patton. We have Obama and his toadies on the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

But some things never change. They had a pathetic man waiving a meaningless piece of paper saying there will be “peace in out time,” with the savages of Germany. We have a pathetic man waiving a meaningless slip of paper telling us that he’s guaranteed the savages of Iran won’t have nuclear weapons – for the next six months, maybe.

Okay, that’s unfair. Whatever his failings, Neville Chamberlain loved his country.

Don Feder is a former Boston Herald writer who is now a political/communications consultant. He also maintains his own website, The following story can be found on the GrassTopsUSA website at Permission to reprint or quote this commentary on the Internet is granted provided you include a byline to Don Feder, attribution to GrassTopsUSA and link back to the article at the URL above.

8230 Catbird Circle 302
Lorton VA 22079
888-239-9306 FAX


An awesome article, and oh so true!

And just yesterday, I stumbled upon the explanation for all this corruption: enemy action!

Here’s a great article on the origins of “Cultural Marxism” in the West.

My only quibbles about that article are that calling ‘Political Correctness’ “Cultural Marxism” is wholly inaccurate and limited in that it pretends lying extortion originated fairly recently with one Karl Marx, Esq. when of course it goes back forever (see also Muhammad’s “islam”).

(by Uncle Vladdi):

Political correctness = factual incorrectness (lying; fraud; crime). We can add slander to that, and extortion, because they pretend if they didn’t lie, then the rest of their group might makes right gang (including the rest of us) would get them for not going along with it.

Morality is very simple: the Golden Rule of law which defines it can be most easily put as “Do Not Attack First.” By agreeing to this, we get trust, progress, and civilization. Everything is thus forbidden, except for that which is specifically allowed by mutual consent.

Our only real right is to not be attacked first, and our only responsibility is to not attack (thereby innocent) others first.

Liberals, like their moslem brethren, hold the exact opposite: That all is allowed unless very specifically legislated against, so they can maintain their false right to remain irresponsibly wrong. And obviously and predictably, from this they get distrust, stagnation, and barbarism.

Liberals are all about false “ethics” – which is only the endless list of who, what, when, where, why and how to excuse yourself once you’ve decided to break that one and only first Golden Rule of Law and morality; ethics are for people without morality.


Beyond that, the moral corruptioon of the world is an inherent problem which, in order to actually (and easily) solve it, must first be faced, defined, explained and then SOLVED!