Archive for the ‘U.N.’ Category

Libs, UN angry at Harper’s anti-Muslim Syrian refugee bias

December 24, 2014

Holy crap! I didn’t think Harper had it in him! Kudos! Does that mean he’s the only sane Western leader left? (Remember: Geert Wilders hasn’t been elected PM – yet)!

From here:

Government faces questions about anti-Muslim bias over Syrian refugees

Lee Berthiaume Ottawa Citizen
Published on: December 12, 2014
DoItForTheMuslimChildrenLibsCry

Displaced Syrian children sit on a tarp after heavy rains in the Bab Al-Salama camp for people fleeing the violence in Syria on December 11, 2014, on the border with Turkey. Aid workers fear a major humanitarian crisis for millions of Syrian refugees in the Middle East after funding gaps forced the United Nations to cut food assistance for 1.7 million people.

Displaced Syrian children sit on a tarp after heavy rains in the Bab Al-Salama camp for people fleeing the violence in Syria on December 11, 2014, on the border with Turkey. Aid workers fear a major humanitarian crisis for millions of Syrian refugees in the Middle East after funding gaps forced the United Nations to cut food assistance for 1.7 million people.

The Conservative government is facing renewed questions about an alleged anti-Muslim bias following revelations it wants to cherry-pick which Syrian refugees will be accepted into Canada.

Sources say the government wants to prioritize religious minorities as a condition for resettling thousands more Syrian refugees in Canada over the next two years.

But the United Nations has resisted Canada’s request, as its policy is to help the most vulnerable, no matter their religious background. This includes families led by women, torture victims and those with serious medical conditions.

The disagreement is reportedly why Canada remained silent at a major UN conference in Geneva this week as other countries promised to help the world body resettle 100,000 Syrian refugees by 2017.

Canada previously agreed to accept 1,300 Syrians by the end of this year, though fewer than 500 had arrived by mid-November.

About 3 million Syrians have fled into neighbouring Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey and Iraq since fierce fighting between Syrian government and rebel forces erupted in 2011. The situation has worsened with the rise of the Islamic State (ISIL) and other extremist groups.

Costas Menegakis, who serves as parliamentary secretary to Immigration Minister Chris Alexander, defended the Conservative government’s focus on religious minorities in the House of Commons Friday.

“We have seen countless examples in recent years of people being persecuted for their religious beliefs,” he said. “We will prioritize persecuted ethnic and religious minorities, those at demonstrated risk, and we will make no apologies for that.”

Menegakis added that any suggestion the government was interested in helping only one group of people was “categorically false.”

The UN High Commission for Refugees’ representative in Canada, Furio de Angelis, was not available for comment Friday.

The desire to accept only religious minorities has sparked fresh concerns the Conservative government’s refusal to do more in response to the Syrian refugee crisis is because the majority of those affected are Muslim.

Sunni Muslims account for nearly three-quarters of all Syrians, according to the CIA Factbook, while other Muslim groups such as Shias, Alawis and Ismailis represent another 16 per cent of the population. Christians and a small number of Jews represent the remaining 10 per cent.

“Obviously that continues to linger as the concern here,” said Amnesty International Canada secretary-general Alex Neve. “That this in some way, shape or form is about the fact that the majority of refugees fleeing Syria are Muslim.”

Amnesty International is just one of many groups, including refugee organizations and the Syrian-Canadian community, as well as opposition parties, that have been pressing the government to open the doors to another 10,000 Syrian refugees.

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL JUST CROSSED THE FINAL LINE INTO DANGEROUS CRIMINAL IRRELEVANCE

Syrian Canadian Council spokesman Faisal Alazem said religious minorities make up an important and vibrant part of Syria’s culture, “and no one is suggesting that non-Muslims should not be protected.”

MORE TAQIYYA, ANYONE?

“But you treat people based on the need and on the vulnerability,” he said. “If the government is looking at the Middle East or Syria from only a sectarian angle, that would be a huge disappointment.”

MUSLIMS ARE SUCH VICTIMS OF ANTI-JUDEO-CHRISTIAN MUSLIM VIOLENCE, AREN’T THEY?

NDP foreign affairs critic Paul Dewar accused the government of breaking from the international community as well as Canada’s own tradition of accepting those most in need of protection, no matter their backgrounds.

WELL OF COURSE THE COMMUNISTS ARE UPSET BY THE OTHER POOR CRIMINALS’ PLIGHT.

TerroristsLivesMatter

“It’s unprecedented and going in a terrible direction,” agreed Liberal immigration critic John McCallum. “I find this shocking. To impose a religious filter is just not right.”

The head of one of Canada’s largest Muslim organizations, the National Council of Canadian Muslims, issued a statement Friday saying he was “deeply troubled” and calling on the government to come clean on its intentions.

“It is inconceivable that our government would suggest implementing a policy that creates a two-tier refugee system in which vulnerable people are assessed based on their personal religious beliefs rather than on their needs,” NCCM executive director Ihsaan Gardee said.

UNLIKE ISLAM, WHICH DOESN’T CREATE A TWO-TIER SYSTEM OF OPPRESSION IN THE DAR-AL-HARB?

Citizenship and Immigration Canada officials told Immigration Minister Chris Alexander earlier this year that Canada could accept 3,000 more government-assisted refugees in 2015, 2,700 in 2016 and 4,700 in 2017.

I SURE HOPE THEY’RE ALL CHRISTIANS (AND YEZIDIS; HELL, ANYTHING NON-MUSLIM IS OK BY ME)!

AND THE COMMENTS OVER AT THE CITIZEN SITE ARE AWESOME! PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP!

😉

Muslims: 1400 Years of In-Breeding

December 13, 2014

From here:

According to a Obstetrician at Westmead Hospital more than 60% of children born with intellectual handicap in Sydney are Muslims from the Middle East.

In breeding in the Muslim world – not suprising.

This apparently came from a Lockheed pilot who has had 3 assignments to Saudi Arabia .

During the pilot transition program with the KV-107 and C-130 with Lockheed, we found that most Saudi pilot trainees had very limited night vision, even on the brightest of moon lit nights. Their training retention rate was minimal including maintenance personnel.

Some had dim memories and had to be constantly reminded of things that were told to them the day before. Needless to say, an American, British or any other western instructor gets burned out pretty quick. It actually took Muslim C-130 pilots years before they could fly in the dark safely and then would be reluctant to leave the lights of a city. Ask any Marine, Air Force or Army guy who’s been trying to train Iraqis, and especially Afghans. They will say, “Yep, dumber than homemade dodo”.

Islam is not only a religion, it’s a way of life all the way around. Yet another set of revealing facts about Muslim beliefs and traditions and ways of life. -1400 years of inbreeding.

I found this to be interesting. Didn’t know whether to believe it or not. To research I went to Wikipedia, “Cousin Marriage”, and far down in the article “Genetics”, it seems there is a lot of truth here.

A huge Muslim problem: Inbreeding

Nikolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into a little-known problem in the Muslim world: the disastrous results of Muslim inbreeding brought about by the marriage of first-cousins.

This practice, which has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses, was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world.

This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world, since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.

The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health.

According to Sennels, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. In Pakistan , the numbers approach 70%. Even in England, more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and in Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.

The numbers are equally devastating in other important Muslim countries:
67% in Saudi Arabia , 64% in Jordan , and Kuwait , 63% in Sudan , 60% in Iraq , and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar .

According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders. While Pakistanis are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK, they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects.

The risks of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher.

Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the risk of still births and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor.  Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns.

According to Sennels, research shows that children of consanguineous marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as “retarded,” increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages. (Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.)

In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army.  Sennels says that “the ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world.” He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does.  In the last 1,200 years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year.

Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book.

Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. “A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies.”  Only nine Muslims have ever won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the “Peace Prize.” According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10 percent of the world average when it comes to scientific research measured by articles per million inhabitants.

In Denmark, Sennels’ native country, Muslim children are grossly over represented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background. Learning ability is severely affected as well.

Studies indicated that 64% of school children with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.

Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness. The increased risk of insanity may explain why more than 40% of patients in Denmark ’s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant background.

The U.S. is not immune.

According to Sennels, “One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.”

But I’m sure liberals will chalk this up to white racism!

Sennels concludes: There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims. Because Muslims’ religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. This has produced overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences.

Bottom line: Islam is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to the Judeo-Christian tradition. As Sennels points out, the first and biggest victims of Islam are Muslims.

Simple Judeo-Christian compassion for Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization from the ravages of Islam dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and dangerous religion.

These stark realities must be taken into account when we establish public polices dealing with immigration from Muslim countries and the building of mosques in the U.S. but are currently ignored!

The Good Muslim Terrorist

November 22, 2014

ReligionOfTerror

From here:

_79093089_79093088There are no Palestinians. There are no moderate Syrian rebels. There is only Islam.

The axe that fell on the head of a Rabbi in Jerusalem was held by the same hand that beheaded Yazidi men in the new Islamic State. It is the same hand that held the steering wheel of the car that ran over two Canadian soldiers in Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Quebec and the same hand that smashed a hatchet down on the skull of a rookie New York City cop in Queens all in a matter of months.

Their victims were of different races and spoke different languages. They had nothing in common except that they were non-Muslims. This is the terrible commonality that unites the victims of Islamic terror.

Either they are not Muslim. Or they are not Muslim enough for their killers.

The media shows us the trees. It does not show us the forest. It fragments every story into a thousand local narratives. In Jerusalem the killers were angry because of Jews praying on the Temple Mount. In Queens and Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, they were outraged because we were bombing the Islamic State.

And in the Islamic State they were killing Christians and Yazidis because America hadn’t bombed them yet.

Our leaders and our experts, the wise men of our multicultural tribes, who huddle in their shiny suits around heavy tables, believe in the good Muslim terrorist the way that the Muslim believes in Allah. The good Muslim terrorist who is willing to make peace for the right price is their only hope of salvation. The good Muslim terrorist willing to settle for Palestine or Syria at 50 percent off is their way out of a war.

And so like Chamberlain at Munich and FDR at Yalta, like a thousand tawdry betrayals before, they make themselves believe it. And then they make us believe it.

A thousand foreign policy experts are dug out, suited up and marched into studios to explain what specific set of un-Islamic Muslim grievances caused this latest beheading and how the surviving non-Muslims need to appease their future killers. And then another tree falls. And another head rolls.

The appeasement never works. No non-Muslim country has ever reliably made peace with Muslim terrorists inside its own borders. Even the Muslim countries have a shaky track record. Most have settled for either massacring them, like Algeria and Jordan, or secretly allying with them, like just about every Muslim country from Pakistan to Saudi Arabia.

And yet Nigeria is expected to cut a deal with the Boko Haram rapists of its little girls, Israel is expected to negotiate with the mass murderers of its Rabbis, Hindus in India are expected to negotiate with the Jihadists who burn them alive and somehow arrive at a peaceful settlement. And if the peace doesn’t come, then it won’t be the fault of the rapists, the axe-wielders and arsonists, but of their victims.

It is never the Muslim terrorists who are at fault for not being appeased by any compromise and any concession. It is the fault of their victims for not appeasing them hard enough.

Compromise with Muslim terrorists is impossible because the issue is not really about Jerusalem, oil revenues in Nigeria, Kashmir or Syria. It’s always about Islam. The territorial claims are unlimited and uncompromisable because they are backed by Islam. No concession can ever suffice because Islam promises its followers not merely some land in Syria, Israel or India… but the entire world.

The forest is Islam. The trees are theirs because the forest belongs to them. Jerusalem and Kashmir are not any different than New York or Sydney. Muslim historical claims are mythologies invented to give weight to their religious violence.

After losing a few wars the Arab Muslims who had been fighting for a Greater Syria decided that they would fall back to claiming to be “Palestinians” while demanding a state on the territories that the Jordanians and Egyptians had ethnically cleansed Jews from in 1948 before losing a war to those same Jews in 1967. But that was never anything other than a down payment on the rest of Israel.

Meanwhile the Islamic State is recreating Greater Syria under a Caliphate.

Turkey’s president, who sponsors the Islamic State and dreams of reviving the Ottoman Empire, recently announced that America was originally Muslim. It’s absurd, but so is claiming that Israel never existed and that its Arab Muslim conquerors are really some sort of ancient “Palestinian” people who were there first. When even the most ridiculous lie is told often enough, it becomes mistaken for a fact.

The good Muslim terrorist is born out of this false history. Unlike the bad Muslim terrorist who wants Caliphates and harems of frightened little girls, who wants Islamic law and beheadings on every corner, the good Muslim terrorist is misunderstood, lacks economic opportunities, is traumatized by war and unaware of the benefits of peace. What he really wants is his own McDonald’s franchise in Jerusalem. He wants microfinance in Kashmir. He wants to build solar panels with 3D printers to fight climate change in Nigeria.

These are the lies that the modern Chamberlains tell themselves and then us. These are the lullabies that the newscasters hum audiences to sleep with just before the bombs go off and the heads roll.

There are no good Muslim terrorists. There are no moderate Jihadists. There is only Islam.

There were no friendly Islamic militias in Benghazi. There are no moderate Taliban. No one is looking to cut a deal for peaceful nuclear energy in Tehran. They are looking to cut our throats.

The moderate and the extremist, the good and bad Muslim terrorists, are no different than our own police game of good cop and bad cop. President Abbas of the Palestinian Authority said that his policies are no different than those of Hamas. The Free Syrian Army and the Al Qaeda aligned militias in Syria fight together. They are both out to create an Islamic state.

The only difference is that the FSA and the Palestinian Authority get their money and weapons from us. Hamas and Al Qaeda get them from our allies in Turkey and Qatar. And they often get them from us.

Behind every bad scowling Muslim terrorist whom we hunt with drones is one of our good Muslim terrorists or one of our good Muslim allies. There would be no Taliban or Bin Laden without Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.

There would be no ISIS without Qatar. And there would be no Qatar without our protection. Even while we bomb ISIS with our planes, our air power protects Qatar. Even while we condemn the latest Muslim terrorist attack in Jerusalem, we fund the payments that will be given as a reward to the families of the killers.

There are no good Muslim terrorists. There is no territorial compromise that will sweep away a thousand years of brutal ideology and replace it with our idea of the good life. Moderates who just want an extra mile on a map don’t chop down old men at prayer, don’t rape little girls or burn families to death.

Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the good Muslim terrorist are all stories that we tell ourselves. It’s time to start telling ourselves the truth.

OF COURSE, SINCE ALL MUSLIMS ARE TERRORISTS, DITTO FOR THE MYTH OF THE GOOD MUSLIM!

😉

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and LIKE it on Facebook.

AND:

IslamistTerror

Criminal masochists fear fear more than pain itself, which is why they tend to always try to “control” their fears BY causing the very pains they fear most!

None of which pathologically irrational emotional reactions ever get around to fixing the mistakes or solving the problems which cause the pains in the first place!

No problem was ever solved by ignoring it, but gosh darn it, criminally negligent liberal frauds can always be counted on to just keep on trying anyway!

Besides, the banksters who own all the corporations which own all the political parties always finance BOTH sides of EVERY conflict, because then the winners still owe them AND so do the losers; THEY never lose, and the only frontiers left are the destruction and “reconstruction” of all existing countries!

America didn’t fare so well under its own “reconstruction” costs, so why should we inflict same on anyone – much less on everyone – else, too?!

And the banksters just got caught funding muslim terrorists (quel surprise):

https://vladdi.wordpress.com/2014/11/21/lawsuit-accuses-banks-of-financing-terror-attacks/

The Qur’an clearly and specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims:

Sura (Chapter) 47:1-4 of the Qur’an:

1: non-muslims are bad, because they insult allah by dividing his nature;
2: muslims are good, because to them allah is the cause of everything;
3: Allah made them both like that;
4: So muslims should chop off the non-muslims’ heads.
(Allah could have done it himself, but he wants you muslims to do it for him).”

It’s all right there, in context: islamic violence is entirely general doctrine-driven, and not at all specific grievance-driven.

(And chapter 47 isn’t by any stretch even remotely the worst, most violent chapter; that honor goes to either chapter 8 or 9).

So, if and when you consider islam to be a religion, you must agree with it’s main tenet: that God is a violent murderer who wants his muslim tribe to violently conquer the world by extorting, enslaving, and murdering all the non-muslim humans, right?

Bottom line: If you decide to believe in “allah,” you have declared yourself a criminal, and so must be arrested, indicted, tried and convicted. Your confession of “faith” in your crime-god will help us to do so.

Free Ebola: Obama Demands End to State Ebola Quarantines

October 28, 2014

I just posted the PROOF OF OBAMA’S PLANS TO USE EBOLA TO GENOCIDE AMERICA, from Tom Fitton’s JUDICIAL WATCH, here, and now this additional proof of wilful criminal negligence, from here:

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century.

Obama-Hazmat-suit-small

It’s bad enough that Obama rejects an Ebola travel ban because he thinks we need more Ebola,  but he’s attacking Democrats and Republicans who are doing the responsible thing by enacting quarantines.

The Obama administration has been pushing the governors of New York and New Jersey to reverse their decision ordering all medical workers returning from West Africa who had contact with Ebola patients to be quarantined, an administration official said on Sunday.

But both governors, Andrew M. Cuomo of New York and Chris Christie of New Jersey, stood by their decision, saying that the federal guidelines did not go far enough.

“It’s too serious a situation to leave it to the honor system of compliance,” Cuomo said of the decision.

Ever since Mr. Cuomo, a Democrat, and Mr. Christie, a Republican, announced the plan at a hastily called news conference on Friday evening, top administration officials have been speaking with Mr. Cuomo daily and have also been in touch with Mr. Christie, trying to get them to rescind the order.

But in that time, two more states – Illinois and Florida – announced that they were instituting similar policies.

A senior administration official, who did not want to be identified in order to discuss private conversations with state officials on the issue, called the decision by the governors “uncoordinated, very hurried, an immediate reaction to the New York City case that doesn’t comport with science.”

What exactly is that anonymous official’s background in science? Same as Joe Biden’s Chief of Staff/Obama’s Ebola Czar?

Quarantining people who are potentially infected doesn’t comport with science? Please tell me more, Guy Who Got This Job Because He’s the Brother in Law of a Campaign Donor.

The decision to institute a mandatory quarantine came after a New York doctor, Craig Spencer, received a diagnosis of Ebola on Thursday, having contracted the virus while working in Guinea for Doctors Without Borders. He is being treated at Bellevue Hospital Center, where his condition has worsened, an expected development as the virus replicates and spreads through his body.

But it wouldn’t be a media pile on without the usual idiot showing up to fight a travel ban.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Disease, said it was vital not to do anything that might interfere with the flow of health workers to West Africa.

“The harm is that it is totally disruptive of their life. We want them to go because they are helping us to protect America to be over there,” Dr. Fauci said on CNN.

No they’re not. They’re helping Africa. And that may be a noble thing, but it’s endangering America.

Obama doesn’t prioritize America over Africa. American leaders should.

HAMAS BY THE NUMBERS

October 26, 2014

The racist UN gives over HALF of their (our!) entire global fund for refugees EVERYWHERE on earth, to the so-called “palestinians” (Arab squatters occupying JUDEA, HEBRON and Samaria).

“Follow the money.”  This video maps it for us. I do not trust Mossab, but what he says here is 100% true. The translations of sermons and speeches are accurate. The images are authentic. 

Only one fact is missing: HAMAS = ISLAM.  Google “Charter of HAMAS” and read it all, with special attention to Art. 9.  Read the following linked Qur’an verses and ahadith. While Bukhari 52 is open, read the entire book. Then read Book 53, only then will it all make sense. 
3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220 

Please share this vital information, make it go viral.

-Al Dajjal-

Bilderberger Group Plotting

October 15, 2014

PlottingBilderbergers

Here’s the truth of it fully exposed – I hope it leads to people wanting to at least try to change things!

BANKSTERS SELL MONEY. (Over time, on the installment plan, ‘renting’ it out.) Obviously, this instantly devalues the money itself, as well as the goods it buys and the labor earning it. So, we are – literally – all living on borrowed time now.

Oh, and they’re also total FRAUDS, because they have bribed all governments to “legally” allow them to literally write checks their reserves can’t cash, under their “fractional reserves” doctrine… to the tune of up to FIFTY TIMES what they actually have (‘in reserve’)!

This means that they can lend out $50. for every real $1. they actually have, and, even if they only charge 2% interest on it, they double their actual money each and every year.

That means, if I’m a bankster’s kid, and I ‘invest’ only $1,000 in dad’ s bank when I’m 20, then by the time I’m 30 that $1,000 has become a million; by age 40, a billion, and by the time I feel like ‘retiring’ at age 50, I have a trillion un-earned fraud-based dollars to call my own!

First year my money doubles, etc:

Year:

1, 2, 3,   4,  5,   6,    7,     8,      9,       10

My money becomes “worth:”

2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1,024

So, since the bankster Families have been at this for over 200 years, YES by now THEY REALLY DO OWN THE WORLD.

And they will always back both sides in every war and conflict, because then both the winners owe them AND the losers do, and they will both have to pay the banksters for their reconstruction efforts, too!

So: It’s always WIN/WIN for them, and LOSE/LOSE for all the rest of us!

How Hamas Deliberately Created a Humanitarian Crisis in Gaza

August 11, 2014

Re-posted from here:

There has been a lot of talk lately about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. What has gone curiously unmentioned by all the great humanitarians from the UN and “human rights” groups, however, is the degree to which this crisis was deliberately fomented by Hamas: Aside from starting the war to begin with, Hamas has done its level best to deprive Gazans of everything from food to medical care to housing, despite Israel’s best efforts to provide them.

Take, for instance, the widely reported shortages of medicines and various other essentials. Many of these products are imported, and since Egypt has largely closed its border, Gaza has only one conduit for these vital imports: the Kerem Shalom crossing into Israel. Thus if Gaza’s Hamas government had any concern whatsoever for its citizens, ensuring that this crossing was kept open and could function at maximum efficiency would be a top priority.

Instead, Hamas and other terrorist groups subjected Kerem Shalom to relentless rocket and mortar fire throughout the 29-day conflict, thereby ensuring that the job of getting cargo through was constantly interrupted as crossing workers raced for cover. Hamas also launched at least three tunnel attacks near Kerem Shalom, each of which shut the crossing down for hours.

Despite this, Israeli staffers risked their lives to keep the crossing open and managed to send through 1,491 truckloads of food, 220 truckloads of other humanitarian supplies, and 106 truckloads of medical supplies. But the numbers would certainly have been higher had the nonstop attacks not kept disrupting operations. On August 1, for instance, a shipment comprising 91 truckloads of aid had to be aborted on when Hamas violated a humanitarian cease-fire by launching a massive attack near Kerem Shalom.

Then there’s the shortage of medical care, as Gaza’s hospitals were reportedly overwhelmed by the influx of Palestinian casualties. To relieve this pressure, Israel allowed some Palestinians into Israel for treatment and also set up a field hospital on the Gaza border. But throughout the war, the field hospital stood almost empty–which Israel says is because Hamas deliberately kept Palestinians from using it.

Many pundits dismiss this claim, insisting there were simply no Palestinians who wanted to go there. That, however, is highly implausible. Gazans routinely seek treatment in Israel because it offers better medical care than Gaza does; as one Gazan said in 2012, “It is obvious that people come to Israel for medical treatment, regardless of the political conflict.” Even Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh sends his family to Israel for treatment; over the past two years, Israel has treated both his granddaughter and his sister’s husband. So while some Palestinians undoubtedly objected to accepting help from the enemy, it’s hard to believe there weren’t also Palestinians who simply wanted the best possible care for their loved ones, and would gladly have accepted it from Israel had they not feared retaliation from a group with no qualms about shooting dissenters.

It’s also worth noting that “humanitarian” organizations in Gaza actively contributed to this particular problem. UNRWA and the Red Cross did refer a few patients to the Israeli field hospital. But you have to wonder why they opted to refer most patients to Gaza’s Shifa Hospital and then make videos about how difficult conditions there were instead of easing the burden on Shifa by referring more patients to the Israeli hospital.

Then, of course, there’s the dire electricity shortage–also courtesy in part of Hamas, which destroyed two power lines carrying electricity from Israel to Gaza and subsequently prevented their repair by shelling the area nonstop.

Finally, there’s the massive destruction of houses in Gaza, which has left thousands of families homeless. That, too, was largely courtesy of Hamas: It booby-trapped houses and other civilian buildings, like a UNRWA clinic, on a massive scale and also used such buildings to store rockets and explosives.

Sometimes, it blew up these buildings itself in an effort to kill Israeli soldiers. Other times, the buildings blew up when relatively light Israeli ammunition like mortar shells–which aren’t powerful enough to destroy a building on their own–caused the booby traps or stored rockets to detonate. As Prof. Gregory Rose aptly noted, Hamas effectively turned all of Gaza into one big suicide bomb. In one neighborhood, for instance, 19 out of 28 houses were either booby-trapped, storing rockets, or concealing a tunnel entrance, thereby ensuring their destruction.

Now, the organization is gleefully watching the world blame Israel for the humanitarian crisis Hamas itself created. And that gives it every incentive to repeat these tactics in the future.

UPDATE: (from here🙂

WorldMediaOnGaza2

Hamas’ Phony Statistics on Civilian Deaths

It’s a mystery why so many in the media accept as gospel Hamas-supplied figures on the number of civilians killed in the recent war. Hamas claims that of the more than 1800 Palestinians killed close to 90% were civilians. Israel, on the other hand, says that close to half of them were combatants. The objective facts support a number much closer to Israel’s than to Hamas’.

Even human rights groups antagonistic to Israel acknowledge, according to a New York Times report, that Hamas probably counts among the “civilians killed by Israel” the following groups: Palestinians killed by Hamas as collaborators; Palestinians killed through domestic violence; Palestinians killed by errant Hamas rockets or mortars; and Palestinians who died naturally during the conflict. I wonder if Hamas also included the reported 162 children who died while performing child slave labor in building their terror tunnels. Hamas also defines combatants to include only armed fighters who were killed while fighting Israelis. They exclude Hamas supporters who build tunnels, who allow their homes to be used to store and fire rockets, Hamas policemen, members of the Hamas political wing and others who work hand in hand with the armed terrorists.

Several years ago I came up with a concept which I call, the “continuum of civilianality”—an inelegant phrase that is intended to convey the reality that who is a civilian and who is a combatant is often a matter of degree. Clearly every child below the age in which he or she is capable of assisting Hamas is a civilian. Clearly every Hamas fighter who fires rockets, bears arms, or operates in the tunnels is a combatant. Between these extremes lie a wide range of people, some of whom are closer to the civilian end, many of whom who are closer to the combatant end. The law of war has not established a clear line between combatants and civilians, especially in the context of urban warfare where people carry guns at night and bake bread during the day, or fire rockets during the day and go back home to sleep with their families at night. (Interestingly the Israeli Supreme Court has tried to devise a functional definition of combatants in the murky context of urban guerrilla warfare.)

Data published by the New York Times strongly suggest that a very large number—perhaps a majority—of those killed are closer to the combatant end of the continuum than to the civilian end. First of all, the vast majority of those killed have been male rather than female. In an Islamic society, males are far more likely to be combatants than females. Second, most of those killed are within the age range (15-40) that are likely to be combatants. The vast majority of these are male as well. The number of people over 60 who have been killed is infinitesimal. The number of children below the age of 15 is also relatively small, although their pictures have been shown more frequently than others. In other words, the genders and ages of those killed are not representative of the general population of Gaza. It is far more representative of the genders and ages of combatants. These data strongly suggest that a very large percentage of Palestinians killed are on the combatant side of the continuum.

They also prove, as if any proof were necessary to unbiased eyes, that Israel did not target civilians randomly. If it had, the dead would be representative of the Gaza population in general, rather than of the subgroups most closely identified with combatants.

The media should immediately stop using Hamas-approved statistics, which in the past have proved to be extremely unreliable. Instead, they should try to document, independently, the nature of each person killed and describe their age, gender, occupation, affiliation with Hamas and other objective factors relevant to their status as a combatant, non-combatant or someone in the middle. It is lazy and dangerous for the media to rely on Hamas-approved propaganda figures. In fact, when the infamous Goldstone Report falsely stated that the vast majority of people killed in Operation Cast Lead were civilians and not Hamas fighters, many in Gaza complained to Hamas. They accused Hamas of cowardice for allowing so many civilians to be killed while protecting their own fighters. As a result of these complaints, Hamas was forced to tell the truth: namely that many more of those killed were actually Hamas fighters or armed policemen. It is likely that Hamas will make a similar “correction” with regard to this conflict. But that correction will not be covered by the media, as the prior correction was not.

The headline—”Most of those killed by Israel were children, women and the elderly”—will continue to be the conventional wisdom, despite its factual falsity. Unless it is corrected, Hamas will continue with its “dead baby strategy” and more people on both sides will die.

Reprinted with author’s permission from the Gatestone Institute
Read more at http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/19784/hamas-phony-statistics-civilian-deaths/#IpmkucohdiSPu2HM.99

 

Part II: Childish Fantasy Could Become Reality

July 9, 2014

From Brandon Smith, here:

Childish Fantasy Could Become Reality

 

This is the second half of a two-part commentary. The first part, Understanding The Globalist Strategy, was published July 1.

Phony Environmentalism And Resource ‘Depletion’

In their 1991 book The First Global Revolution, Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider wrote:

In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common thread which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.

Is our environment under threat? Absolutely. But not in the ways we are often told through mainstream propaganda. The most pervasive swindle perpetrated against the masses today is the lie that the spread of humanity must be regulated due to “resource scarcity” as well as “carbon pollution.”

Globalists saw great opportunity in the rise of the environmentalist movement and have co-opted legitimate concerns with fraudulent puppet causes. When dealing with hundreds of global warming advocates over the years, I have always asked one question that none of them has been able to answer: Where is the source data to prove your theories are valid?

They never had an answer because major climate research organizations have always refused to release their source data to the public. Today, we now know that they wouldn’t release such data because all of their models were deliberately manipulated to show the Earth was warming, when in fact, it has actually been cooling for the past century.

Peak oil, yet another scam, has not produced a single piece of hard data proving that oil production is diminishing, that oil production is becoming more expensive due to more difficult drilling or that demand for oil anywhere in the world is not being met due to lack of supply. No source data means the entire argument for peak oil is based on faith in organizations like The Energy Trap, a peak oil propaganda machine funded by the New American Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation; both are globalist institutions.

The solution to these made-up environment and resource problems is, of course, to do what the globalists have always wanted to do: reduce world population, restrict resource usage, control the average citizen’s means of self-sustainment and force the remaining populace into tightly focused communities where energy, food and shelter are rationed.

Interdependency

In Between Two Ages, Zbigniew K. Brzezinski wrote:

… Marxism represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man’s universal vision. Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief…

Marxism and socialism are simply philosophical reworkings of the collectivist ideology. Collectivism places the “needs” of the group or society over the freedoms and prosperity of the individual. Globalists often proclaim a benevolent desire to “save humanity from itself” through the use of collectivist concepts such as interdependency. Interdependency is the process of removing the self-reliance of individual people, sovereign communities or sovereign nations and making them subservient to the machinations of a complex supply chain dominated by a central authority.

The argument is that through this centralized supply chain, “equality” can be achieved and suffering can be removed. But historic examples of centralization show this to be an absurd notion. Every fascist or communist regime, when selling itself to the public, has offered grand visions of floating cities in the clouds, where resources are infinite and no one will have to exert effort to gain success. A person’s success is “guaranteed” by the establishment, which has the “wisdom” to manage all resources in a magical way using the almighty power of technology. Obviously, no collectivist system has ever followed through on this promise, and I dare say no collectivist system ever will.

Globalists argue violently against the concept of the free market because a true free market is the antithesis to the collectivist con that centralization brings prosperity. If individuals can bring prosperity to themselves and others without the oligarchy, then why have an oligarchy at all?

When left to operate freely, supply and demand tend to gravitate toward the simplest and most efficient systems. However, we have not lived under a free market system for at least 100 years. Instead, we have existed under the encroachment of growing socialism and globalization, which have destroyed our Nation’s capacity for fiscal flexibility and redundancy.

Interdependency serves no practical purpose in the progress of mankind; its only logical purpose is to trap the masses in a manipulated supply and demand cycle which, in the end, creates a “zero growth” world. This is what globalists mean when they talk about “economic harmonization.” They are building an economic framework that prohibits progress and prosperity for the sake of some arbitrary equality, an equality that only serves their desire to micromanage the life of every human being.

The Scattergun Effect

In 2008, Barack Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, commented on the economic downturn, telling a Wall Street Journal conference of top corporate chief executives: “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.Things that we had postponed for too long, that were long-term, are now immediate and must be dealt with. This crisis provides the opportunity for us to do things that you could not do before.”

There is no single unwavering plan that globalists adhere to in pursuit of their new world order; there are only the unwavering goals. A primary goal is to induce chaos and then establish a form of order that most benefits them, but the forms of chaos used may vary. I call this the “scattergun effect.”

As the globalist establishment moves closer to its end game, it will invariably unleash a frenetic storm of distractions and catastrophes. In the past two years alone, events in the Mideast, Ukraine and the South Pacific have set the stage for any number of conflicts between the East and West; and this is completely by design. Some of these triggers will prove unsuccessful, and other will prove effective. I expect multiple “terrorist attacks” (false flag events) in the near term, along with plummeting economic conditions. The purpose is to bewilder the general public to the point that no rational insight can be attained, and fear sets in.

In other words, the citizenry must be adequately tenderized before seasoning.

From Villains To Heroes

In his 1940 book The New World Order, H.G. Wells wrote:

… when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people… will hate the new world order… and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to estimate its promise we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.

Recently, the Bank of International Settlements released a report citing “concerns” over the health of the global economy along with warnings that equities markets have become detached from fundamental realities. The report goes on to insinuate that the easy money policies of central banks have actually been contributing to a disjointed bubble economy, and the BIS warns that this could develop into volatile financial disruption (market crash).

Some in the liberty movement find it rather odd that the BIS, the central bank of central banks, would come out with a report containing warnings that we alternative analysts have been asserting for years. I’m not surprised at all. In fact, I have stated for quite some time that it will be the International Monetary Fund and the BIS that rise from the ashes of the coming collapse of the U.S. dollar and the chaos of a global system in peril to save the day. The BIS is setting the stage today as a prognosticator of a calamity it helped create, so that it can swoop in after the pyre to say: “We told you so, and now we have a plan for your future.”

In the meantime, mainstream media outlets like Reuters have begun publishing articles that warn that there is, in fact, the threat of a new world war between the East and the West, despite economic ties. That’s right; the same people who used to admonish us as “doom mongers” for suggesting that the East would ever oppose the West economically or militarily are now suddenly comparing our current geopolitical situation to the lead up of World War I.

And what has caused it all according to globalist mouthpiece Reuters? National sovereignty and resource division, of course.

The ending to this story is clearly written, at least in the eyes of the elite. Collapse and conflagration will result in a violent state of social misery, which the globalists will allow to swelter until they deem it timely to introduce themselves as saviors. Their solution, predictably, will include the end of self-governing nations, communities and individuals, along with the centralized administration of all vital resources in the name of the “greater good,” the definition of which they will have predetermined. Personal freedoms will fall by the wayside, as survivors of the Third World nightmare will be happy just to live meagerly on the scraps off the table of the oligarchs. It sounds like a childish fantasy, the ambition of a psychotic with visions of deification; however, as long as the common man refuses to accept that such psychotics have the fortitude to organize and conspire, this vision could indeed become a reality.

–Brandon Smith

=============

My REPLY TO BRANDON:

Re: “as long as the common man refuses to accept that such psychotics have the fortitude to organize and conspire, this vision could indeed become a reality.”

Since the education system, like the enemedia, has been deliberately engineered or designed to ask only all the wrong questions all the time, the outcome seems certain.

What’s a “conspiracy theory” again?

Oh, right – it’s a speculative observation about an ORGANIZED CRIME.

SO, if anyone wants to pretend that, by default, all “conspiracy theories” are wrong, then they might as well also say that NO ORGANIZED CRIMINALS EXIST, and THERE HAVE NEVER BEEN ANY ORGANIZED CRIMES, either.

But in fact, since by definition ALL crimes must be “organized” (there must be mens res – “guilty mind” – criminal INTENT behind them,) then EVERY criminal has ALWAYS “conspired” with at least them selves, simply by planning their crimes in advance, in order to commit them!

Besides which: even paranoids can have real enemies, of course, and, if you aren’t paranoid yet, then you simply haven’t been paying enough attention!

Western people won’t educate them *selves* about crime because our own gangster culture encourages us all to idolatrously defer all individual thinking to those “authorities” we PAY to do our thinking and research for us!

And they secretly know full-well that the salesmen in charge will always sell us all out!

The treasonous enemedia presstitutes should be the first to go, for selling out our children’s futures in order to save only their own worthless cowardly skins.

And when they lie, presenting their fact-free opinions AS FACT, any and all so-called ‘politicians’ are committing the crime of fraud to enable all these corporazi murders other crimes as well!

Obviously, there is no crime or perversion a liberal won’t automatically try to Submit to, or at least compromise with. It’s because they are all hopeless masochists, intent on causing the worst-case scenarios they can imagine, so they can pretend to be able to “control the inevitable.” Their ‘solutions’ are always the same, too: to always try to ‘pre-emptively defensively’ form bigger and bigger group-might-makes-right gangs – which instinctive cowardly reaction also explains this phenomena of “globalization.”

…….

Since globalization destroys all sovereign national governments, it’s treason.

And fomenting it is sedition.

And it’s always all about the money, and the illusion of control over others it brings.

Banksters are criminal frauds. And one doesn’t have to be Jewish to be a bankster. They “own” all the deeds and debts of all the other false idolatrous entities OFFICIALLY called “the legal fictions of the corporate persons.” Not only do these vile sales-masters sell money (which obviously instantly devalues not only that money, but the labour and goods it re-presents as well) but they have also “allowed” them selves, through the last two centuries of bribing their political sales-puppets, the luxurious indulgence in outright FRAUD called “fractional reserves,” whereby their mouths literally write checks their pockets can’t cash; they literally print money out of thin air; up to 50 times (5,000%) what they actually have in their reserves. Repeat endlessly, compounding this crime, year after year, and century after century. And, unlike real-world, cause-and-effect investments, they charge idolatrous interest regardless of real economic activity; interest IS inflation. Fraud IS theft, and, so far as I know, theft is still a crime. In fact, all crimes are forms of theft. And the fact that they’ve bought off everybody else, is no excuse (it’s a critical thinking logical fallacy to claim “Evil isn’t evil because we all do it too! Whee!”)

Many wrongs won’t make any of them into rights. Why this globalization and “amnesty” scheme now? Cui bono?

Actually and factually: The USA still has one of the LOWEST corporate tax rates on the planet.

And even if corporate taxes were set to ZERO, since their own corporate-made law says they are only beholden to their bottom lines, they would STILL try to cut costs by downsizing and outsourcing our jobs here to their 3rd-world slave-pens over there (and by bringing their 3rd-world slaves over here, too)!

No jobs here = no taxes here = no government here (which is why it keeps buying China’s money) = no country here = welcome to the globalized plutocracy – treason to all national sovereignties!

Why do you think you keep seeing all these multi-cultural advertising billboards everywhere?!

Who do you think keeps pushing the multi-culti agenda? Who keeps insisting that it’s our duty not to be meanies by importing tons of primitive, non-White moslem savages, because somehow they’re all poor oppressed People Of Color refugees? Who keeps pretending they’re a “minority,” when in fact, worldwide, Blacks and Whites are on par?!

It’s the corporations that do it to us, as they order their pet sales-puppet ‘politicians’ to sell us all out by selling off our countries to the lowest bidders (usually to our declared enemies) by buying (over time, on the installment plan; “borrowing”) their money in our names!

It’s the banksters at the top of that corporate heap, and the oil-barons beneath them who hold all the other corporate gangs hostage to their ‘products!’ Besides, some oilmen own banks, and some banks own oil companies.

They always hate having to pay any taxes to anyone anywhere, ever! So they’re in league with the global communists who want free movement and “equalized” lowest common denominator wages for their own labour slaves, and with the moslems who also hate all nationally sovereign countries, seeing them all as merely temporary, man-made false idols, intending to replace them all with the global moslem umma, ruled by their theocratic caliphate!

And only these enemies of humanity control both the binary behavioural modification sticks (fears of they or their own families being personally firebombed of beheaded by the jihad) and carrots (greed for the oil-money bribes)!

And against this triumverate of evil, what have we got, except the Truth?!

So ask yourself this: What do the communazis, moslems and corporazis all have in common?

They are all idolatrous group-rights-excuse promoting totalitarian Conformists! Extortionist gangster criminals! Corporate welfare = corporate communism!

;-(

Atheislam is nothing more than a giant Argumentum Tu Quoque theodicy crime-excuse!

May 31, 2014

“Allah’s” officially stated cause is to make Islam superior over all other religions:

9:33. It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it).

http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//48.49630.html
http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//2.3156.html
http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.9075.html

http://www.muslimphilosophy.com/ik/Muqaddimah/Chapter3/Ch_3_31.htm

Islam is not even a “religion,” (at all, much less one “of peace,”) much less a “superior” one.

Here’s islam’s “holy Message from god” as exemplified by the collective words and deeds of it’s Founder:

“I will save humanity by lying to, extorting, torturing, robbing, burning out of their homes, kidnapping and ransoming, enslaving, raping and murdering everyone who even only verbally disagrees with me – and you can, too!”

-Muhammad-

Muhammad was really only a con-man and bandit-king, an arch-criminal who always blamed “god” for his own penchant for committing crimes. If Moe got away with committing a crime (and he tried them all, enthusiastically, more than once, but instead of ever showing contrition, bragged about how much fun it was to commit them, and advised everyone else to join in the fun, too), then it was held to be “obvious” that “god” wanted him to get away with having committed those crimes!

Islam itself is only a gigantic, convoluted, victim-blaming slanderous example of an Argumentum Tu Quoque theodicy!

“Muhammad isn’t an evil criminal because we all (i.e: you, ALLAH) do it, too! Whee!”

Just look up all the “In the Way of Allah” references: what do they have in common? As also described explicitly in the Qur’ime manual, “allah” is both unknown, and unknowable – he’s just evil random violence and sudden death! Chaos!

The whole chapter / sura about Moses, shows how “allah” kills off innocent people who “would have” otherwise become “evil,” and replaces them with “better” people. And the whole “moral” of the story is: YOU do not know; only “allah” knows, and he only tells Gebril to tell Muhammad to tell you about any of it!

Sura 4:77: Those who whined “Hold back your hands (from attacking)” were corrected:
“War is compulsory for us – the good and bad both come from allah!”

Allah’s supposed “oneness” with his creation is thus crucial to Muhammad’s eternal theodicy alibi-excuse for his many crimes, and it’s also blatantly, inherently ANTI-God, because when one’s “God” is generally ‘EVERYTHING!’ then it’s also implicitly, specifically ‘NOTHING!’ Existentialism IS Nihilism!

Islam IS Atheism!

The ‘theological’ notion of Allah’s “oneness” is CRUCIAL to their main criminal, might-makes-right alibi, that “we aren’t responsible, and no one is ever really a criminal anyway, because we’re really all only victims:

“The Allah Made Me Do It!”
“In fact, I didn’t do it at all – only the allah did it! Whee!”

[8.17] So you did not slay them, but it was Allah Who slew them, and you did not smite when you smote (the enemy), but it was Allah Who smote, and that He might confer upon the believers a good gift from Himself; surely Allah is All-Hearing, Knowing.

“Fight them; Allah will punish them by your hands and will disgrace them and give you victory over them” – 9:14-15

And, more,

Islam has sentenced all the world’s non-muslims to

“Death By Muslim” for our crime of not being muslims.*

Obviously, the muslims have no “faith” in even their god’s own power nor desire to enforce even it’s own basic us-versus-them and might-makes-right principles, because while, at worst, all real religions only say:

“Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods’) will get you!”

ONLY islam says:

“Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

Obviously, a forced “Faith!” isn’t any kind of a “Faith!” whatsoever – islam isn’t a religion at all, it’s only extortion!

And extortion is ALWAYS a CRIME!

*Of course, for all you selfish subjectively-oriented libertine “liberals” out there, this sad fate can be easily avoided by mumbling some magic words called “the shahada” in Arabic, and by adopting proper attire, but there’s still an unfortunate degree of risk involved, in that you will then also have thereby personally become part of that “death by muslim” function yourself, as they fit you out for your very own shiny new suicide vest with its integral explosive belt. Be proud of your new fashion-statement accessory; you’ve certainly earned it.

😉

Christianity, on the other hand, represents free-will conscience and so potential guilt for not doing one’s best; so since liberals, being criminals, hate all notions of personal, self-reliant responsibility, and in stead choose to favor pre-deterministic alibi excuses to pretend they had no choice but to commit their crimes, must hate Christianity and its symbols, whether or not it’s true. Same for muslims, who are also morally delinquent atheists, because their idolatrous version of a god doesn’t give them free-will responsibility, but only enslaves them and forces them to do both good and bad things! Idolatry is immorality because it’s only an alibi-excuse for one to avoid all self-reliant free-will responsibility.

False East/West Paradigm Hides The Rise Of Global Currency

May 10, 2014

May 6, 2014 by

False East/West Paradigm Hides The Rise Of Global Currency

THINKSTOCK

Despite popular belief, very few things in our world are exactly what they seem. That which is painted as righteous is often evil. That which is painted as kind is often malicious. That which is painted as simple is often complex. That which is painted as complex often ends up being disturbingly two dimensional. Regardless, if a person is willing to look only at the immediate surface of a thing, he will never understand the content of the thing.

This fact is nowhere more evident than in the growing “tensions” between the elites of the West and the elites of the East over the crisis in Ukraine.

I am continually astonished at the refusal of many otherwise intelligent people to consider the evidence or even the possibility that there is, in reality, no fundamental political or philosophical conflict between the power brokers of the East and the West. As I outlined in great detail in Russia Is Dominated By Global Banks, Too, the truth is they are both working toward the same goal; and both ultimately benefit from an engineered and theatrical display of international brinksmanship.

Russia, like the United States, is utterly beholden to globalist financiers through organizations like the International Monetary Fund and the Bank for International Settlements. Russia’s global economic adviser in matters ranging from investment image to privatization is none other than Goldman Sachs.

Goldman Sachs has also worked closely with the Ukrainian government since 2011, and it started its advisory work with Ukraine for free. (Whenever Goldman Sachs does something for free, one should take special note.)

Russia has continued to borrow billions of dollars from Western banks, including Deutsche Bank and Credit Suisse, year after year.

Russian President Vladimir Putin meets with Mr. New-World-Order himself, Henry Kissinger, on a regular basis; and according to Putin’s press secretary, they are “old friends.” Putin’s meetings with Kissinger began almost immediately after he first took power in 2000.

Putin’s relationship with Kissinger has been so pronounced that the Russian Foreign Ministry gave Kissinger an honorary doctorate in diplomacy, and Putin placed Kissinger at the head of a bilateral “working group” — along with former KGB head and multilateralist (globalist) Gen. Yevgeny Primakov — dealing with foreign policy.

In more recent news, I would also remind pro-Putin cheerleaders that Putin and the Kremlin first pushed for the IMF to take control of the Ukrainian economy, and the IMF is now demanding that Ukraine fight Russia in exchange for financial support. This might seem like irony to more foolhardy observers; but to those who are aware of the false East/West paradigm, it is all the part of a greater plan for consolidation of power.

Clearly, Putin and Russia are just two more puppet pieces on the globalist chessboard, pitted against other puppets in the West in a grand theater designed to distract and divide the masses through chaos. As Kissinger points out, in crisis there is opportunity.

What is the goal? They’ve already told us, openly, on numerous occasions.

The first great prizes of the New World Order are a global currency and centralized economic control. Heads of state from around the world, including Putin, as well as international bankers and IMF representatives have all publicly called for the IMF to take charge of the global economic system through its Special Drawing Rights currency program.

However, for the SDR to become a dominant currency, several issues must be resolved. Here’s a short list.

The U.S. Dollar Must Fall

The dollar must lose its world reserve status, and most likely collapse in relative value, before the SDR can be elevated. This is where mainstream pundits lose track of the facts. For them, the dollar is an invincible monetary element, a currency product as infinite as time. Their normalcy bias prevents them from ever acknowledging the many weaknesses of the Federal Reserve note, including our country’s inability to ever service its more than $200 trillion debt. Others believe the dollar is the NWO currency, and that the globalists are somehow U.S.-centric. The evidence posted above suggests otherwise. Globalists have no loyalty to any nation or culture. Their only loyalty is to the progression of their own power. If sacrificing the dollar or the U.S. as a whole furthers that power, then they will have no problem cutting us loose like a rotting appendage.

A Liquidity Replacement Must Be Introduced

As my regular readers know, I have been covering China’s progression toward a decoupling from the U.S. economy for years. China, in my view, has always been the key to the elitist shift into a truly global currency mechanism. The primary argument in the mainstream against the idea of a dollar collapse is that there is no other currency with ample liquidity to take the dollar’s place. Well, in the past couple of years, this has changed.

China and the banks it controls have issued approximately $25 trillion in debt instruments and monetization. This is often referred to as a “debt bubble” created through panic and a weakness in China’s economy and a response to quantitative easing in the United States. I would take a slightly different position. I would say that China’s monetization has been carefully and deliberately engineered in order to lay the foundation for a massive liquidity spike in the Yuan. The argument that China’s incredible debt generation is a sign of impending collapse may be misguided. U.S. debt, including unfunded liabilities, absolutely dwarfs China’s $25 trillion. If any economy is on the verge of implosion, it is that of the United States, not of China.

The Chinese need exponential Yuan circulation. They do not want it to replace the dollar; they are preparing it for induction into the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights basket.

When might this occur?

The IMF holds an international conference and policy meeting on the SDR every five years. During these meetings, the IMF decides if it will absorb a new currency into the basket and if it will expand the creation or circulation of SDRs around the world. Interestingly, the next IMF conference on the SDR just happens to be scheduled for the end of 2014 to the beginning of 2015.

Another strange coincidence: The U.S. Congress was supposed to vote on legislation for further capital allocations to the IMF by April. The vote never came. The new allocations were to fund an expansion of IMF programs and help with the greater inclusion of BRIC nations in governing decisions. If the U.S. government does not pass this legislation, Russia and other nations have demanded that the IMF move forward without the United States on reforms. At the very least, the U.S. would lose its veto power over IMF decisions. I believe that the timing of this is deliberate, that the U.S. is meant to lose its veto power and that the simultaneous SDR conference will announce the inclusion of the Chinese Yuan, setting the stage for the replacement of the dollar as world reserve.

The SDR will not immediately be issued as a commonly traded currency itself. Rather, the IMF will take over management of included currencies and denominate those currencies using SDR valuations. For example, $1 U.S. is worth only .64 SDR today. In the near future, I expect that the dollar will plummet in relation to the SDR’s value. We will still have our greenbacks when the IMF begins administrating our currency system, but the international and domestic worth of those greenbacks will fall to pennies. In turn, other currencies with stronger economic positions will rise in worth relative to the SDR.

I believe one of the primary determinations in a currency’s value compared to the SDR will be a country’s stockpile of gold. This is why Russia and China in particular have been purchasing precious metals at an unheard-of rate (and why U.S. gold reserves have never been audited). The IMF itself is one of the world’s largest holders of physical gold, with nearly 3,000 metric tons (officially). With the crash of the dollar system and investors clamoring for a reliable hedge to protect whatever savings they have left, gold could conceivably skyrocket into the $5,000 to $10,000 per-ounce range. Governments holding the metal will be favorably placed during an implementation of the SDR as the new reserve standard.

A Cover Event Must Be Created

The centralization of power is best achieved during moments of bewildering calamity. The conjuring of crises is one of the oldest methods of elitist dominance. Not only can they confuse and frighten the masses into malleability, but they can also ride to the public’s rescue as heroes and saviors later on. The Hegelian dialectic is the mainstay of tyrants.

The destruction of the dollar and the institution of a global economic bureaucracy are not actions that can be executed openly by international financiers. These events will coincide with extreme catastrophe, likely worse than the Great Depression era, with millions upon millions of people losing the ability to financially support themselves and their families. Crime, death and public discontent will surely follow. People will be looking for someone to blame. This is where the false East/West paradigm comes in.

I have warned for quite some time that the development of East/West tensions would be used as a cover for a collapse of the dollar system. I have warned that among the American media this collapse would be blamed on an Eastern dump of foreign exchange reserves and treasuries, resulting in a global domino-effect ending U.S. world reserve status. In turn, the international community would be conditioned to see this as the mere bumbling of a spoiled America gone power-mad, rather than the result of a covert program of economic destabilization. This might lead to all-out war or a fiscal firestorm that leaves much of the world crippled and desperate for aid.

In either case, the elitist plan is to use scapegoats and false enemies to draw our attention away from the real culprits: the international banks themselves. Make no mistake: This fight is not about President Barack Obama, it is not about Putin and it is not even about the Federal Reserve. These men are tools, errand boys, public mascots. Do not be fooled by the global stage play being perpetrated. Whatever happens in Ukraine and whatever happens between Russia, China and the West, there are only two real sides to this battle: the elitist establishment and those who are smart enough to recognize their poison.

–Brandon Smith