Here’s the predictably obvious differences between raising tabula-rasa human children in an indoctrinating culture of “THOU SHALT KILL!” as opposed to one of “THOU SHALT NOT KILL!”
Holy mobster Moslems only hate “infidels” because the Qur’an says “god” orders them to – Period.
Islam is a threat to everyone because IT says it is.
ALL moslems are criminals because, by their own rules, they must endorse in public every word in the Qur’an.
And the Qur’an tells them that they are so “superior” to all non-moslem humans, that it’s not only their right, but also their holy duty to their god, to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-moslems in the world, simply for the “crime” of not being moslems.
So the Qur’an is a clearly-written, us-versus-them hate-crime book, endorsing a permanent might-makes-right death-threat.
And all threats are psychological attacks (aka: coercion, duress, extortion, “terrorism”) and all non-defensive attacks are already classified as crimes.
After all, when you attack the Others first, then, by definition, you are the predatory criminal aggressor, and they are your innocent victims – there’s no two ways about it!
(Attacking second, or counter-attacking, in defense of one’s self and/or of innocent others, is always OK, and in fact such retaliation is the most basic and crucial, mandatory requirement for having any sort of deterring justice in the world at all, ever)!
In fact, one doesn’t need a god to agree to the basic principle embodied in the Golden Rule of Law which simply defines all sitational morality as:
Do Not Attack First.
Attacking second (Retaliatory counter-attacking to deter evil) is mandatory for justice.
And Threats – intimidation; coercion; duress; harrassment; activist agitation; extortion; terrorism – are (psychological) attacks.
We only have on real right – to not be attacked first – and one real responsibility – to not attack innocent others first. And that’s it; the entire social contract of Civilization.
In reality, it’s all about human reason and an ongoing, dynamic agreement to become situationally right (as in factually correct) as opposed to whining that one should be entitled to the static, idolatrous and victim-blaming right to remain irresponsibly wrong:
We in the West self-reliantly CHOOSE to agree to the Golden Rule of Law, which, by simply defining all situational morality as: “Do Not Attack First!” enables trust, progress, and Civilization.
(See all “Western” countries)!
Even the “Ten” Commandments are really only a bunch of listed symptoms, illustrating this simple binary; the first five are all cautions to “Fear and Obey!” while the second five are all admonishments not to steal! Thus, they, too, can be summed up as “Greed NOT; Be Fearful!” (or, as The Golden Rule of Law which defines all situational morality as: Don’t Attack First)!
But they in the East force everyone to obey the brazen rule of chaos, which embodies immorality as: “Our god says we always have to attack all ‘The Others’ first!” and so inflicts distrust, stagnation, and Barbarism.
(See all ‘moslem’ countries)!
So anyone who engages in the puerile, critical thinking logical fallacy of the Argumentum Tu Quoque, by falsely and slanderously asserting that “All Religions Are The Same!”
… is really only a coward who already knows, fears, and so Submits to islamic extortion; i.e:
“ISLAM ISN’T EVIL BECAUSE WE ALL DO IT TOO! Whee!”
…as if merely by listing and comparing two or more incidental cases of wrongs, would somehow magically turn one of them into a right!
Tags: Ten Commandments