0bama’s crimes continue

Is there no limit to the crimes Barak Hussein is willing to commit in public?!

A few days ago, after an innocent man was found to be entirely not guilty, and so was aquitted and exonerated of all the charges against him (of racial profiling, second degree murder, and even manslaughter) by a jury of women, 0bama again opened his big mouth to fraudulently slander the man in public. And, when such slander comes not only from a public official, but from the putative president of the United States himself, the damages are obvious: George Zimmerman’s  life will always be in danger for his “crime” of defending himself against a protected minority! “Officials” can bully citizens with impunity!

You don't know the power of the Black Side!

You don’t know the power of the Black Side!

Despite that witnesses saw his gangsta assailant, Trayvon Martin, pounding George Zimmerman’s head into the concrete, and even despite Martin’s own girlfriend, Rachel Jeantel’s, admission that Trayvon was laying a “whoop-ass” beating at the time George managed to shoot him dead in self-defense, despite the facts that Trayvon was high on drugs, had been expelled from school for drugs and violence, and had recently been arrested for burglary in the area, the Hussein continues to insist that Zimmerman was in the wrong to defend himself, and that ‘young Trayvon’ was a victim of racial profiling and an unwarranted attack. In reality, George Zimmerman was an 0bama-voting registered Democrat, who has black grandparents himself, attended a local black church, and was the only one in the neighborhood to protest the unprovoked beating of a homeless black man who had been beaten to death by a local police official’s son the year before, no doubt sacrificing his career ambitions at the same time, since George had always desperately wanted to become a member of that same Police Department. In their racist race to blame ‘whitey,’ 0bama and Holder threw one of their own under the media bus, ignoring Zimmerman’s own “protected minority” status.

And, even after all that evidence came out in public during the trial, 0bama keeps on fraudulently slandering Zimmerman, as he hopes to incite mob violence across the nation.

In televised comments Monday, Attorney General Eric Holder confirmed the Department of Justice continues to investigate whether it can still nab Zimmerman on civil rights charges.

ImageGeorge Zimmerman was obviously assaulted first by Trayvon Martin.

To socialist extortionists, every crisis is an opportunity to exploit and divide the citizens:

“We must not, as we have too often in the past, let this opportunity pass,” Holder said. “We are resolved, as you are, to combat violence involving or directed at young people to prevent future tragedies and to deal with the underlying attitudes, mistaken beliefs and stereotypes that serve as the basis for these too common incidents.”

Notice how he wants to combat “violence involving or directed at young people” but not specifically violence commited by young people. And why only “young” (black) people, Holder? Shouldn’t you be concerned by violence committed against all American citizens?

“And we will never stop working to ensure that in every case, in every circumstance and in every community,” he concluded, “justice must be done.”

SAYING “JUSTICE MUST (YET) BE DONE” AFTER A TRIAL VERDICT, IS A FORM OF PUBLIC SLANDER, OBVIOUSLY IMPLYING THAT HE BELIEVES JUSTICE WASN’T DONE!

Holder stopped short of arguing Zimmerman was actually guilty, but his comments reaffirmed a statement from the Department of Justice Sunday that the investigation continues.

“The Department of Justice’s Criminal Section of the Civil Rights Division, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida and the Federal Bureau of Investigation continue to evaluate the evidence generated during the federal investigation, as well as the evidence and testimony from the state trial,” the statement said. “Experienced federal prosecutors will [now] determine whether the evidence reveals a prosecutable violation of any of the limited federal criminal civil rights statutes within our jurisdiction, and whether federal prosecution is appropriate in accordance with the Department’s policy governing successive federal prosecution following a state trial.”

Let’s not forget that Holder’s DOJ actually illegally paid it’s people your tax dollars to bus in protesters and foment riots in the case, too. I’m sure campaigning to influence the outcome of any given criminal trial, not to mention to incite discord and violence, is against all laws.

And now they’ve even blatantly set up a tax-paid hotline to solicit more fraudulent slander:

0bama’s Department of Justice wants Americans’ tips on Trayvon Martin’s civil rights to build its federal case against George Zimmerman, the man acquitted of second-degree murder charges Saturday.

The DOJ is asking that all tips be sent to Sanford.florida@usdoj.gov

Isn’t asking the public to help slander a man the court just officially found innocent, with illegal fraud – not to mention directly and deliberately promoting your own racist hate-crime propaganda, a CRIME?!

Here’s my tip to Holder’s hotline:

“Dear UberSturmFuhrer Erich Von HOlder: Your only civil right is to not be attacked first, and your only civil responsibility is to not attack (therefore innocent) other people first.

Rights only come with responsibilities, so when you renege on your responsibiity to this social contract by attacking someone else first, you automatically give up your right not to be counter-attacked.

Since George Zimmerman was deemed to have been attacked first by Trayvon Martin, it was also deemed that it was Trayvon who gave up his only civil right to not be counter-attacked in defense by Mr. Zimmerman; it was Trayvon’s own choice to breach his only civil responsibility which deprived him of his only civil right – CAPISCE?

Secondly, “civil” rights and “civil” law aren’t some magical second chance venue where you can endlessly dispute “contentious” criminal-court decisions; in fact, it’s most often the case where a civil suit can only proceed once all the facts have been thoroughly vetted in the much more rigorously, evidentially restrictive, criminal court venue first.

Criminal guilt must be proven “beyond any reasonable doubt,” while merely civil matters must only be proven “on a balance of probabilities;” i.e: 51 to 49%.

So mostly, if you lose the initial criminal case, you pretty-much by definition haven’t a hope of winning any subsequent lesser civil suits.

Besides, isn’t it illegal (“double jeopardy”) to charge a person twice for the same alleged crime? Even if you decide to re-classify the crime under a different name, using the exact same circumstances? That’s what the prosecutors are for: to choose in advance which crimes one is most likely to be successfully indicted for, in order to be charged with. And the ‘judge’ in this case, even broke the law herself, and lied to the jury when she said that if they couldn’t find Zimmerman guilty of even second-degree murder, then they could always charge him with the even lesser crime of manslaughter. Or maybe jaywalking.

;-)

Despite reality, in a surprise appearance in the White House briefing room, 0bama spoke at length Friday about the impact of the George Zimmerman trial and the death of black teenager Trayvon Martin, talking of his own personal experiences with racism, saying it would be “useful” to review “stand your ground” laws and to renew efforts aimed at boosting the self-esteem of black boys.

SEEMS TO ME TRAYVON HAD WAY TOO MUCH SELF-ESTEEM; HE WAS A BLACK BELT.

After a week of reporters questioning why 0bama hadn’t spoken on television about the case, he appeared in the White House press briefing room unannounced and discussed his reaction to the verdict and observing that Trayvon Martin “could have been me 35 years ago.”

0bama, pretending to speak off the cuff, while still using his teleprompter, said he is still “bouncing around” ideas with his staff, but he proposed several approaches, including a study of “stand your ground” laws that allow people to use deadly force when they feel threatened.

“It’d be useful for us to examine some state and local laws to see if they are designed in such a way that they may encourage the kinds of altercations and confrontations and tragedies like we saw in the Florida case,” 0bama said.

He also said Americans need to examine whether racial bias was a factor in the episode.

AND YET THAT WAS ALREADY OFFICIALLY EXAMINED IN DEPTH DURING THE TRIAL!

If Trayvon Martin was of age and armed, could he have stood his ground on that sidewalk?” Mr. Obama asked. “And do we actually think that he would have been justified in shootingMr. Zimmerman?

Well, let’s see, Barry: Trayvon was more than standing his ground: his own phone records and his girlfriend’s testimony indicate he was initiating a deadly physical assault on George, while sitting atop his chest. Trayvon made sure George was grounded and so couldn’t stand up at all, much less escape him by running away, even if he’d wanted to.

A Florida jury on Saturday found Mr. Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer, not guilty of second-degree murder in the February 2012 shooting of the teen. The Justice Department is reviewing whether the teenager’s civil rights were violated.

Because an assailant’s civil rights to live and continue to assault you, somehow might trump your right to defend yourself from his assaults by killing him for it?

He spoke in personal terms about Trayvon Martin’s death and the experiences of blacks such as himself who have been profiled because of their skin color. He said black Americans bring a special history and set of circumstances in judging the Florida trial and its verdict.

EXCEPT ALL THE OFFICIAL TRIAL EVIDENCE ALREADY PROVED IT NOT THE CASE.

This kinda sounds like:

“You are not entitled to resist extortion! You have no right to self-defense, especially if your attacker is a protected minority! And, since blacks are in the minority, they have the right to murder ten whites each.”

-Eric Holder-

When Trayvon Martin was first shot, I said that this could have been my son,0bama said.Another way of saying that is Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago. And when you think about why, in the African- American community at least, there’s a lot of pain around what happened here, I think it’s important to recognize that the African- American community is looking at this issue through a set of experiences and a history that — that doesn’t go away.”

0bama added, “There are very few African-American men in this country who haven’t had the experience of being followed when they were shopping in a department store. That includes me.” MAYBE THERE’S A REAL REASON FOR THAT, ZERO!

And there are very few African-American men who haven’t had the experience of walking across the street and hearing the locks click on the doors of car,” he said. “That happens to me, at least before I was a senator. There are very few African-Americans who haven’t had the experience of getting on an elevator and a woman clutching her purse nervously and holding her breath until she had a chance to get off. That happens often.”

0bama said he didn’t want to “exaggerate” those feelings of black citizens, while doing so.

But those sets of experiences inform how the African-American community interprets what happened one night in Florida. And it’s inescapable for people to bring those experiences to bear,” he said.

SO THEIR RIGHT TO NOT BE OFFENDED AND HAVE THEIR FEELINGS HURT, TRUMPS THE OFFICIAL, COURT-VETTED EVIDENTIARY FACTS THAT ZIMMERMAN IS INNOCENT?

Immediately after the Feb. 2012 shooting, 0bama spoke out about the case, saying if he had a son, the boy might have looked like Travyon Martin. On Friday, he said communities should do more to help black boys in their upbringing to ensure they succeed.

Pure Idolatrous victim-blaming excuse-making; i.e:

“Trayvon didn’t do it – ONLY The COMMUNITY did it! Whee!”

He said the country needs to think about “how do we bolster and reinforce our African-American boys?”

There are a lot of kids out there who need help, who are getting a lot of negative reinforcement,” 0bama said, adding that America needs to give them “a sense that their country cares about them.”

Mr. Obama said black Americans “are not naive” about the difficulties they face.

“Folks understand the challenges that exist for African-American boys,” he said. “But they get frustrated if they feel there’s no context for it, and context is being denied.”

0bama said Americans should respect the jury’s verdict, but said white Americans should also understand that African Americans are anguished by the acquittal and still face racial discrimination. He said Americans should do “soul-searching,” but expressed skepticism that a “national conversation” on face would do much good if led by politicians.

THEY ARE ANGUISHED BY THE ACQUITTAL? SO WHAT? DOES THAT MEAN HE INSISTS THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO REMAIN IRRESPONSIBLY WRONG, DESPITE ALL THE FACTS?!

“On the other hand, in families and churches and workplaces, there’s the possibility that people are a little bit more honest, and at least you ask yourself your own questions about, am I wringing as much bias out of myself as I can?” 0bama said. NO SHIT SHERLOCK.

These actions of Holder’s and 0bama’s are CRIMES, people. It’s against the law to slander anyone, because slander is pre-judice and fraud: it’s making accusations to incite hate without even a shred of evidence as proof of the veracity of one’s claims.

It’s no longer as if 0bama is free to speculate and comment on matters which have not yet been officially investigated and the evidence tried in a court of law – all the facts have come out, and all the witnesses, both for the prosecution, and for the defense, have unanimously agreed: it was Trayvon Martin’s own decision to give up his right to not be counter-attacked in defense, by reneging on his own responsibility to not attack innocent others first, which deprived him SELF of his civil rights to life and freedom.

Why would 0bama and holder find “stand your ground” laws to be suspicious?

Maybe because they’d like to pretend we have a duty to Submit to other types of criminal extortion – to islam, for instance?

I mean, really; what sort of insane “law” pretends one has to accede to the criminals’ timetables and plans?!

“If the criminal stops attacking (for whatever reason, known only to them) then you have to immediately stop defending yourself, too!”

Say a criminal attacks you, but runs out of bullets before managing to finish you off. They then run away, intending to re-load and then return to finish the job.

Obviously, you don’t know why they stopped, nor what they’ll do next (but the balance of probabilities says that, since they’ve already chosen to attack you first, there’s no reason to imagine they suddenly became enlightened saints) so why shouldn’t you follow them to make sure?!

They retain all their free-will rights to commit further crimes, while you are limited to their whims and timetables, like some robotic imbecile – the “law” pretends you are limited to immediate defense only, and aren’t allowed to counter-attack at all!

And yet all crimes are routinely counter-attacked well after the facts, sometimes even years later, in the courts of law: by the time any criminal gets to trial, they aren’t immediately then endangering anyone, their crimes are all, by definition, in the past! So why punish them at all (as liberals might argue)?!

Because they must pay for their past crimes!

This is both how and why revenge IS justice!

But what we have now, is “liberal” criminal oriented, victim-blaming “laws” which seem to ask:

“Mr. Smith, while the gangsters were busy raping your wife and beating your daughter with chains and clubs, why on earth did you decide to commit the “crime” of defensively counter-attacking them, in stead of choosing “the only legal,” rational, and sane action of simply running away like you should have (and like we all most certainly would have) done?!”

The Douche-in-Chief is really only slandering all non-black Americans as racists here.

People used to shoot cowards in wartime because most cowards are also traitors.

0bama imagines he might have been Trayvon Martin, 35 years ago?

IF ONLY he had been, and if only he’d met up with the George Zimmerman of the time!

ImageRace-baiting lies are CRIMES of fraud and slander.

Advertisements

Tags: , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: